Literature DB >> 20680319

Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold.

Monica Yadava1, Graham J Roberts, Victoria S Lucas.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20680319     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  8 in total

1.  Age estimation of living people undergoing criminal proceedings.

Authors:  A Schmeling; A Olze; W Reisinger; G Geserick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Dental age assessment (DAA): a simple method for children and emerging adults.

Authors:  G J Roberts; S Parekh; A Petrie; V S Lucas
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: the accuracy and precision of three methods.

Authors:  U Hägg; L Matsson
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Analysis of 1202 orthopantograms to evaluate the potential of forensic age determination based on third molar developmental stages.

Authors:  B Willershausen; N Löffler; R Schulze
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age.

Authors:  H H Mincer; E F Harris; H E Berryman
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.832

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth.

Authors:  M Maber; H M Liversidge; M P Hector
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 2.395

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Estimation of fetal age at death from the basilar part of the occipital bone.

Authors:  Tomohito Nagaoka; Yoshinori Kawakubo; Kazuaki Hirata
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Dental age assessment on panoramic radiographs in a Swiss population: a validation study of two prediction models.

Authors:  Flavia A Birchler; Stavros Kiliaridis; Christophe Combescure; Lydia Vazquez
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  In our opinion.

Authors:  G Roberts; V S Lucas; F McDonald; S Camilleri; J Jayaraman; D Davies; K Moze
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Dental age estimation: periodontal ligament visibility (PLV)-pattern recognition of a conclusive mandibular maturity marker related to the lower left third molar at the 18-year threshold.

Authors:  Victoria S Lucas; Fraser McDonald; Manoharan Andiappan; Graham Roberts
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Assessment of dental age of children aged 3.5 to 16.9 years using Demirjian's method: a meta-analysis based on 26 studies.

Authors:  Jin Yan; Xintian Lou; Liming Xie; Dedong Yu; Guofang Shen; Yilin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.