| Literature DB >> 20680170 |
Justin Cy Wu1, Eric Tc Ziea, Lixing Lao, Emma Fc Lam, Catherine Sm Chan, Angela Yq Liang, Sunny Lh Chu, David Tw Yew, Brian M Berman, Joseph Jy Sung.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: While it is well established that acupuncture relieves somatic pain, its therapeutic effect on visceral pain such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is unclear. We evaluated the effect of acupuncture in treating visceral hyperalgesia in an animal model.Entities:
Keywords: Brain-gut axis; Electroacupuncture; Fos; Hyperalgesia; Serotonin
Year: 2010 PMID: 20680170 PMCID: PMC2912124 DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2010.16.3.306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil ISSN: 2093-0879 Impact factor: 4.924
Figure 1Effect of electroacupuncture on pain threshold and visceromotor response. (A) Rats in electro acupuncture (EA) group and non-handled control (NH) group had significantly higher pain threshold pressures in response to colorectal balloon distension than those in sham acupuncture (SA) group. (B) Rats in SA group had significantly higher mean area under curve values compared to those in EA and NH group at all distension pressures. MS, maternal separation. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. Two-tailed p-values were determined by one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 for post hoc comparisons of SA to EA and NH group. ***p < 0.05 for post hoc comparisons between EA and NH group using Bonferroni correction.
Figure 2Comparison of serotonin (5-HT) expression between electroacupuncture (EA) and sham acupuncture (SA) groups. Immunohistochemistry showed significantly lower 5-HT expression (arrowed) in the dorsal raphe nucleus of the brain (A, EA; B, SA; ×40) and laminae I & II of superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord (C, EA; D, SA; ×40) in rats treated with EA compared to those treated with SA. There was no difference in 5-HT expression at colonic mucosa between the 2 groups (E, EA; F, SA; ×40).
Comparison of Median Threshold Area Percentages of 5-HT Expression at Dorsal Raphe Nucleus of Brainstem, Superficial Dorsal Horn of Spinal Cord and Colonic Mucosa among Rats of Electroacupuncture, Sham Acupuncture and Non-handled Control Groups
EA, electroacupuncture; SA, sham acupuncture; NH, non-handled control; DRN, dorsal raphe nucleus; SDH, superficial dorsal horn.
Median values (range) were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Comparisons between EA and SA group (ap = 0.02) and between SA and NH group (bp = 0.006) at DRN of brainstem, comparisons between EA and SA group (cp = 0.001) and between SA and NH group (dp < 0.001) at SDH of spinal cord, comparisons between EA and SA group (ep = 0.14) and between SA and NH group (fp = 0.01) at colonic mucosa.
Figure 3Comparison of Fos expression between electroacupuncture (EA) and sham acupuncture (SA) groups. Immunohistochemistry showed significantly lower Fos expression (arrowed) in the dorsal raphe nucleus of the brain (A, EA; B, SA; ×40), laminae I and II of superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord (C, EA; D, SA; ×40) and colonic mucosa (E, EA; F, SA; ×40) in rats treated with EA compared to those treated with SA. Fos positive cells were highly abundant on colonic epithelium among SA rats compared to EA rats.
Comparison of Median Threshold Area Percentages of Fos Expression at Dorsal Raphe Nucleus of Brainstem, Superficial Dorsal Horn of Spinal Cord and Colonic Mucosa among Rats of Electroacupuncture, Sham Acupuncture and Non-handled Control Groups
EA, electroacupuncture; SA, sham acupuncture; NH, non-handled control; DRN, dorsal raphe nucleus; SDH, superficial dorsal horn.
Median values (range) were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Comparisons between EA and SA group (ap = 0.01) and between SA and NH group (bp = 0.02) at DRN of brainstem, Comparisons between EA and SA group (cp < 0.001) and between SA and NH group (dp < 0.001) at SDH of spinal cord, comparisons between EA and SA group (ep = 0.005) and between SA and NH group (fp = 0.01) at colonic mucosa.