BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis are characterized by different risk factors, thus control strategies for each also differ. In contrast, risk factors for Mycoplasma genitalium have not been well characterized. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2006, 1090 women ages 14 to 45 attending the Public Health-Seattle & King County Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic in Seattle, WA, underwent clinical examination and computer-assisted survey interview. M. genitalium was detected by transcription mediated amplification from self-obtained vaginal swab specimens. C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were detected by culture from cervical swab specimens. RESULTS: Prevalent M. genitalium infection was detected in 84 women (7.7%), C. trachomatis in 63 (5.8%), and N. gonorrhoeae in 26 (2.4%). Age <20 and nonwhite race were associated with increased risk for all 3 organisms. In addition, risk for M. genitalium was higher for women with a black partner (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.83-6.29), those never married (AOR: 2.6; 1.08-6.25), using Depo-Provera (AOR: 2.3; 1.19-4.46), and smoking (AOR: 1.7; 1.03-2.83). Drug use, history of STI in the past year, ≤high school education, meeting and having intercourse the same day, anal sex, douching, and hormonal contraception were associated with N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis, but not with M. genitalium. Number of partners was not associated with any of the 3 organisms. CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of risk factors for prevalent infection common to all 3 pathogens suggests that M. genitalium may circulate in different sexual networks than N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis. The predominance of sociodemographic risk factors for M. genitalium, rather than high-risk sexual behaviors, suggests broad-based testing may be the most effective control strategy.
BACKGROUND:Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis are characterized by different risk factors, thus control strategies for each also differ. In contrast, risk factors for Mycoplasma genitalium have not been well characterized. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2006, 1090 women ages 14 to 45 attending the Public Health-Seattle & King County Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic in Seattle, WA, underwent clinical examination and computer-assisted survey interview. M. genitalium was detected by transcription mediated amplification from self-obtained vaginal swab specimens. C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were detected by culture from cervical swab specimens. RESULTS: Prevalent M. genitaliuminfection was detected in 84 women (7.7%), C. trachomatis in 63 (5.8%), and N. gonorrhoeae in 26 (2.4%). Age <20 and nonwhite race were associated with increased risk for all 3 organisms. In addition, risk for M. genitalium was higher for women with a black partner (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.83-6.29), those never married (AOR: 2.6; 1.08-6.25), using Depo-Provera (AOR: 2.3; 1.19-4.46), and smoking (AOR: 1.7; 1.03-2.83). Drug use, history of STI in the past year, ≤high school education, meeting and having intercourse the same day, anal sex, douching, and hormonal contraception were associated with N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis, but not with M. genitalium. Number of partners was not associated with any of the 3 organisms. CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of risk factors for prevalent infection common to all 3 pathogens suggests that M. genitalium may circulate in different sexual networks than N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis. The predominance of sociodemographic risk factors for M. genitalium, rather than high-risk sexual behaviors, suggests broad-based testing may be the most effective control strategy.
Authors: L J Elliott; J F Blanchard; C M Beaudoin; C G Green; D L Nowicki; P Matusko; S Moses Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Kara S Riehman; Wendee M Wechsberg; Shelley A Francis; Melvin Moore; Antonio Morgan-Lopez Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Chavonne D Lenoir; Nancy E Adler; Dina L G Borzekowski; Jeanne M Tschann; Jonathan M Ellen Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: S O Aral; J P Hughes; B Stoner; W Whittington; H H Handsfield; R M Anderson; K K Holmes Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Aneesh K Tosh; Barbara Van Der Pol; J Dennis Fortenberry; James A Williams; Barry P Katz; Byron E Batteiger; Donald P Orr Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Jennifer E Balkus; Lisa E Manhart; Jørgen S Jensen; Omu Anzala; Joshua Kimani; Jane Schwebke; Juma Shafi; Charles Rivers; Emanuel Kabare; R Scott McClelland Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jocelyn Ronda; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jamie Perin; Lisa Tabacco; Jenell S Coleman; Maria Trent Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Katherine G Michel; Richard P H Huijbregts; Jonathan L Gleason; Holly E Richter; Zdenek Hel Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Andrea Swartzendruber; Jonathan M Zenilman; Linda M Niccolai; Trace S Kershaw; Jennifer L Brown; Ralph J Diclemente; Jessica M Sales Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Victoria L Mobley; Marcia M Hobbs; Karen Lau; Barbara S Weinbaum; Damon K Getman; Arlene C Seña Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Richard P H Huijbregts; E Scott Helton; Katherine G Michel; Steffanie Sabbaj; Holly E Richter; Paul A Goepfert; Zdenek Hel Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.736