Literature DB >> 20679959

Intraoperative neural response telemetry as a predictor of performance.

Maura K Cosetti1, William H Shapiro, Janet E Green, Benjamin R Roman, Anil K Lalwani, Stacey H Gunn, John Thomas Roland, Susan B Waltzman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraoperative neural response telemetry (tNRT) is predictive of postoperative speech perception. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Children (n = 24) aged between 5 and 17 years and adults 18 years and older (n = 73) with severe-to-profound hearing loss and implanted with the Nucleus Freedom device between 2005 and 2008 and observed at least 1 year were included. INTERVENTION: Intraoperative neural response telemetry after insertion of the electrode array. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Measures included 1) intraoperative tNRT measurements and 2) preoperative and 1-year postoperative open-set word recognition scores using age-appropriate open-set tests for children and adults. Intraoperative neural response telemetry levels for electrodes E20, E15, E10, and E5 in each patient were correlated to performance at the 1-year evaluation interval.
RESULTS: No correlation existed between tNRT responses and open-set speech performance at the 1-year evaluation. Several patients had absent tNRT in the OR but developed speech recognition abilities, whereas the remaining patients had intraoperative responses with levels of postoperative performance ranging from 0% to 100%.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there is no significant correlation between intraoperative tNRT and speech perception performance at 1 year. At the time of surgery, tNRT provides valuable information regarding the electrical output of the implant and the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation and preliminary device programming data; however, it is not a valuable predictor of postoperative performance. Furthermore, the absence of tNRT does not necessarily indicate a lack of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679959     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ec1b8c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Cochlear implant electrode misplacement: incidence, evaluation, and management.

Authors:  Yu-Lan Mary Ying; Jerry W Lin; John S Oghalai; Robert A Williamson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Round window electrocochleography just before cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults.

Authors:  Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Adam P Campbell; Adam T Campbell; Baishakhi Choudhury; Margaret T Dillon; Margaret P Dillon; Mathieu Forgues; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  A Retrospective Study of Cochlear Re-Implantations - Experience from a Large Centre in India.

Authors:  Abha Kumari; Sunil Goyal; Senthil Vadivu Arumugam; Viswanathan Vasumathi; Neha Chauhan; Mohan Kameswaran
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Brittney L Carter; William J Riggs; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Matthew Robert Bartindale; Kent Sean Tadokoro; Matthew Lowell Kircher
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-08

6.  Effect of inner ear malformations on intraoperative ECAP thresholds and postoperative auditory performance.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Sung Hwa Hong; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-15

7.  Modeling of Auditory Neuron Response Thresholds with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Frederic Venail; Thibault Mura; Mohamed Akkari; Caroline Mathiolon; Sophie Menjot de Champfleur; Jean Pierre Piron; Marielle Sicard; Françoise Sterkers-Artieres; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Polarity Sensitivity in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Automated remote intraoperative cochlear implant device testing (CR220). Is it clinically efficient?

Authors:  Eman A Hajr; Fida A Almuhawas
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.484

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.