PURPOSE:Sentinel lymph node resection (SNR) may reduce morbidity while providing the same clinical utility as conventional axillary dissection (AD). National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 is a randomized phase III trial comparing SNR immediately followed by AD (SNAD) to SNR and subsequent AD if SN is positive. We report the definitive patient-reported outcomes (PRO) comparisons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had clinically node-negative, operable invasive breast cancer. The PRO substudy included all SN-negative participants enrolled May 2001 to February 2004 at community institutions in the United States (n = 749; 78% age > or = 50; 87% clinical tumor size < or = 2.0 cm; 84% lumpectomy; 87% white). They completed questionnaires presurgery, 1 and 2 to 3 weeks postoperatively, and every 6 months through year 3. Arm symptoms, arm use avoidance, activity limitations, and quality of life (QOL) were compared with intent-to-treat two-sample t-tests and repeated measures analyses. RESULTS: Arm symptoms were significantly more bothersome for SNAD compared with SNR patients at 6 months (mean, 4.8 v 3.0; P < .001) and at 12 months (3.6 v 2.5; P = .006). Longitudinally, SNAD patients were more likely to experience ipsilateral arm and breast symptoms, restricted work and social activity, and impaired QOL (P < or = .002 all items). From 12 to 36 months, fewer than 15% of either SNAD or SNR patients reported moderate or greater severity of any given symptom or activity limitation. CONCLUSION:Arm morbidity was greater with SNAD than with SNR. Despite considerable fears about complications from AD for breast cancer, this study demonstrates that initial problems with either surgery resolve over time.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node resection (SNR) may reduce morbidity while providing the same clinical utility as conventional axillary dissection (AD). National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 is a randomized phase III trial comparing SNR immediately followed by AD (SNAD) to SNR and subsequent AD if SN is positive. We report the definitive patient-reported outcomes (PRO) comparisons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had clinically node-negative, operable invasive breast cancer. The PRO substudy included all SN-negative participants enrolled May 2001 to February 2004 at community institutions in the United States (n = 749; 78% age > or = 50; 87% clinical tumor size < or = 2.0 cm; 84% lumpectomy; 87% white). They completed questionnaires presurgery, 1 and 2 to 3 weeks postoperatively, and every 6 months through year 3. Arm symptoms, arm use avoidance, activity limitations, and quality of life (QOL) were compared with intent-to-treat two-sample t-tests and repeated measures analyses. RESULTS: Arm symptoms were significantly more bothersome for SNAD compared with SNR patients at 6 months (mean, 4.8 v 3.0; P < .001) and at 12 months (3.6 v 2.5; P = .006). Longitudinally, SNAD patients were more likely to experience ipsilateral arm and breast symptoms, restricted work and social activity, and impaired QOL (P < or = .002 all items). From 12 to 36 months, fewer than 15% of either SNAD or SNR patients reported moderate or greater severity of any given symptom or activity limitation. CONCLUSION: Arm morbidity was greater with SNAD than with SNR. Despite considerable fears about complications from AD for breast cancer, this study demonstrates that initial problems with either surgery resolve over time.
Authors: Roberta H Baron; Jane V Fey; Patrick I Borgen; Michelle M Stempel; Kathleen R Hardick; Kimberly J Van Zee Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-02-13 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Gilles Berclaz; Ossi R Koechli; Gabriel Schaer; Mathias K Fehr; Thomas Hess; Daniel Oertli; Lucio Bronz; Beate Schnarwyler; Edward Wight; Urs Uehlinger; Eduard Infanger; Daniel Burger; Markus Zuber Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jacek A Kopec; Greg Yothers; Patricia A Ganz; Stephanie R Land; Reena S Cecchini; H Samuel Wieand; Barry C Lembersky; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giovanna Gatti; Giovanni Mazzarol; Concetta De Cicco; Gianfranco Manfredi; Julia Rodríguez Fernández Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Stephanie R Land; Marcie W Ritter; Joseph P Costantino; Thomas B Julian; Walter M Cronin; Sarah R Haile; Norman Wolmark; Patricia A Ganz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David N Krag; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Ann M Brown; Seth P Harlow; Takamaru Ashikaga; Donald L Weaver; Barbara J Miller; Lynne M Jalovec; Thomas G Frazier; R Dirk Noyes; André Robidoux; Hugh M C Scarth; Denise M Mammolito; David R McCready; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Richard J Bleicher; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; John M Daly; Marcia Boraas; Penny R Anderson; Brian L Egleston Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Joan M Neuner; Nathan Zokoe; Emily L McGinley; Liliana E Pezzin; Tina W F Yen; Marilyn M Schapira; Ann B Nattinger Journal: Breast Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Judith O Hopkins; Jake Allred; Arti Hurria; Aminah Jatoi; Jacqueline M Lafky; Harvey Cohen; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Ann Partridge; Lisa Carey; Hyman B Muss Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-08-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: A Gabriella Wernicke; Michael Shamis; Kulbir K Sidhu; Bruce C Turner; Yevgenyia Goltser; Imraan Khan; Paul J Christos; Lydia T Komarnicky-Kocher Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: David N Krag; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Ann M Brown; Seth P Harlow; Joseph P Costantino; Takamaru Ashikaga; Donald L Weaver; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Lynne M Jalovec; Thomas G Frazier; R Dirk Noyes; André Robidoux; Hugh Mc Scarth; Norman Wolmark Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Mila Donker; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Marieke E Straver; Philip Meijnen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Robert E Mansel; Luigi Cataliotti; A Helen Westenberg; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Lorenzo Orzalesi; Willem H Bouma; Huub C J van der Mijle; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Sanne C Veltkamp; Leen Slaets; Nicole J Duez; Peter W de Graaf; Thijs van Dalen; Andreas Marinelli; Herman Rijna; Marko Snoj; Nigel J Bundred; Jos W S Merkus; Yazid Belkacemi; Patrick Petignat; Dominic A X Schinagl; Corneel Coens; Carlo G M Messina; Jan Bogaerts; Emiel J T Rutgers Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Natalia S Tucker; Amy E Cyr; Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Adel Tabchy; Krystl George; Piyush K Sharma; Linda X Jin; Souzan Sanati; Rebecca Aft; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler; William E Gillanders Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 12.969