Literature DB >> 20679121

Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications.

Rob Procter1, Robin Williams, James Stewart, Meik Poschen, Helene Snee, Alex Voss, Marzieh Asgari-Targhi.   

Abstract

Sharing research resources of different kinds, in new ways, and on an increasing scale, is a central element of the unfolding e-Research vision. Web 2.0 is seen as providing the technical platform to enable these new forms of scholarly communications. We report findings from a study of the use of Web 2.0 services by UK researchers and their use in novel forms of scholarly communication. We document the contours of adoption, the barriers and enablers, and the dynamics of innovation in Web services and scholarly practices. We conclude by considering the steps that different stakeholders might take to encourage greater experimentation and uptake.

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679121     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  6 in total

1.  The scientific social network.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Jonathan M Dugan; Daniel Graziotin; Damien C Jacques; François Waldner; Daniel Mietchen; Yehia Elkhatib; Lauren B Collister; Christina K Pikas; Tom Crick; Paola Masuzzo; Anthony Caravaggi; Devin R Berg; Kyle E Niemeyer; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Sara Mannheimer; Lillian Rigling; Daniel S Katz; Bastian Greshake Tzovaras; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Nazeefa Fatima; Marta Poblet; Marios Isaakidis; Dasapta Erwin Irawan; Sébastien Renaut; Christopher R Madan; Lisa Matthias; Jesper Nørgaard Kjær; Daniel Paul O'Donnell; Cameron Neylon; Sarah Kearns; Manojkumar Selvaraju; Julien Colomb
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars' work.

Authors:  Orsolya Vásárhelyi; Igor Zakhlebin; Staša Milojević; Emőke-Ágnes Horvát
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice.

Authors:  Yimei Zhu
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Web 2.0 applications in medicine: trends and topics in the literature.

Authors:  Christophe Boudry
Journal:  Med 2 0       Date:  2015-04-01

6.  To Crowdfund Research, Scientists Must Build an Audience for Their Work.

Authors:  Jarrett E K Byrnes; Jai Ranganathan; Barbara L E Walker; Zen Faulkes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.