Literature DB >> 20678599

Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: compliance among perioperative nurses.

Kay Ball1.   

Abstract

More than 500,000 health care workers are exposed to surgical smoke every year. Toxic gases create an offensive odor, small particulate matter causes respiratory complications, and pathogens may be transmitted in the surgical smoke to the surgical team. Previous research notes that perioperative nurses do not consistently follow smoke evacuation recommendations. The purpose of this study was to determine key indicators that are associated with compliance with smoke evacuation recommendations. Data from a web-based survey completed by 777 nurse members of AORN were analyzed to examine the relationship between the key indicators and compliance with smoke evacuation recommendations. Major findings were that specific key indicators influencing compliance include increased knowledge and training, positive perceptions about the complexity of the recommendations, and increased specialization, interconnectedness, and leadership support in larger facilities. Education programs can be developed that directly address these key predictors so that a surgical environment free from surgical smoke is promoted. 2010 AORN, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20678599     DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2009.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AORN J        ISSN: 0001-2092            Impact factor:   0.676


  14 in total

Review 1.  Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.

Authors:  Kae Okoshi; Katsutoshi Kobayashi; Koichi Kinoshita; Yasuko Tomizawa; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Workplace safety equals patient safety.

Authors:  Deborah Spratt; Charles E Cowles; Ramon Berguer; Vangie Dennis; Thomas R Waters; Margaret Rodriguez; Cynthia Spry; Linda Groah
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.676

3.  Optimizing the language and format of guidelines to improve guideline uptake.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Navjot Rai; Onil Bhattacharrya; Alice Y Y Cheng; Kim A Connelly; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Alan Kaplan; Melissa C Brouwers; Monika Kastner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Secondhand smoke in the operating room? Precautionary practices lacking for surgical smoke.

Authors:  Andrea L Steege; James M Boiano; Marie H Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  A simple way to improve the safety of the surgical field.

Authors:  G F Guarneri; E R Cordaro; Gloria Semprini; F Cattin; P C Parodi
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01

7.  Scalpel can achieve better clinical outcomes compared with electric cautery in primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison study.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Yike Dai; Jinghui Niu; Guangmin Yang; Ming Li; Fei Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  It is time for a more cautious approach to surgical diathermy, especially in COVID-19 outbreak: A schematic review.

Authors:  Raju Karuppal; Sibin Surendran; Gopinathan Patinharayil; V V Muhammed Fazil; Anwar Marthya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-16

9.  Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wendy A Gifford; Janet E Squires; Douglas E Angus; Lisa A Ashley; Lucie Brosseau; Janet M Craik; Marie-Cécile Domecq; Mary Egan; Paul Holyoke; Linda Juergensen; Lars Wallin; Liquaa Wazni; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Surgical Smoke-Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms.

Authors:  Martina Michaelis; Felix Martin Hofmann; Albert Nienhaus; Udo Eickmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.