Literature DB >> 20677259

Can MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection provide appropriate arterial phase images with reducing artifacts on gadoxetic acid-DTPA (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced hepatic MR imaging?

Hiroki Haradome1, Luigi Grazioli, Mika Tsunoo, Rita Tinti, Barbara Frittoli, Sebastiana Gambarini, Mario Morone, Utaroh Motosugi, Stefano Colagrande.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether using MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection improves the quality of arterial phase images in gadoxetic acid-DTPA-enhanced (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MR imaging because of proper acquisition timing and reduction of artifacts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixteen patients undergoing examination for liver diseases were retrospectively reviewed. All MR images were obtained with two Gd-EOB-DTPA injection protocols: (i) a combination protocol, in which the MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection (1 mL/s) were used; and for comparison, (ii) a conventional protocol, in which adjusted fixed scan delay and ordinary rate injection (2 mL/s) were adopted. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of aorta, portal vein, and liver parenchyma on arterial phase images were calculated. Two blinded readers independently evaluated the obtained arterial phase images in terms of acquisition timing and degree of artifacts.
RESULTS: The SNRs of aorta and portal vein on arterial phase images were significantly higher in the combination protocol group (aorta/portal: 221.9 +/- 91.9/197.1 +/- 89.8) than that in the conventional protocol group (aorta/portal: 169.8 +/- 97.4/92.7 +/- 48.5) (P < 0.05). The acquisition timing for arterial phase images with the combination protocol was significantly better than that with the conventional protocol (P < 0.01). The image quality of the combination protocol was significantly higher than that of the conventional protocol (P < 0.01). The occurrence rate of moderate or severe degree of artifacts in the conventional protocol (38.0%) was more prominent than that in the combination protocol (18.5%).
CONCLUSION: The combination of the MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection provides proper arterial phase images and reduces the artifacts in Gd-EOB-DTPA MR imaging. 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20677259     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  30 in total

1.  Respiratory motion artefacts in dynamic liver MRI: a comparison using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Julian A Luetkens; Patrick A Kupczyk; Jonas Doerner; Rolf Fimmers; Winfried A Willinek; Hans H Schild; Guido M Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The challenges of novel contrast agents for the imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Carmen Ayuso; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver in the era of gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Francesco Agnello; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Dario Picone; Federica Vernuccio; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Lydia Giannitrapani; Adele Taibbi; Antonino Agrusa; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Massimo Galia; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri; Giuseppe Brancatelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Radial volumetric imaging breath-hold examination (VIBE) with k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for dynamic gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI of the liver: advantages over Cartesian VIBE in the arterial phase.

Authors:  Yasunari Fujinaga; Ayumi Ohya; Hirokazu Tokoro; Akira Yamada; Kazuhiko Ueda; Hitoshi Ueda; Yoshihiro Kitou; Yasuo Adachi; Aya Shiobara; Naomichi Tamaru; Marcel D Nickel; Katsuya Maruyama; Masumi Kadoya
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Insight into hepatocellular carcinoma biology with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Alexander Kagen; Kathryn Fowler; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20

6.  An Investigation of Transient Severe Motion Related to Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Peter Bannas; Candice A Bookwalter; Katsuhiro Sano; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker for tumour differentiation, staging and long-term clinical outcomes in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Tae Wook Kang; Dong Ik Cha; Seong Hyun Kim; Kyung Sook Shin; Jeong Eun Lee; Kee-Taek Jang; Soo Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Magnetic Resonanance Imaging of the Liver (Including Biliary Contrast Agents)-Part 2: Protocols for Liver Magnetic Resonanance Imaging and Characterization of Common Focal Liver Lesions.

Authors:  Andrea Agostini; Moritz F Kircher; Richard K G Do; Alessandra Borgheresi; Serena Monti; Andrea Giovagnoni; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 0.800

9.  Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MR imaging of cholangiolocellular carcinoma of the liver: imaging characteristics and histopathological correlations.

Authors:  Hiroki Haradome; Toshiyuki Unno; Hiroyuki Morisaka; Yusuke Toda; Thomas C Kwee; Hiroshi Kondo; Keiji Sano; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Fukuo Kondo; Masahiko Sugitani; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetic acid for local tumour progression after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kang; Hyunchul Rhim; Jisun Lee; Kyoung Doo Song; Min Woo Lee; Young-Sun Kim; Hyo Keun Lim; Kyung Mi Jang; Seong Hyun Kim; Geum-Youn Gwak; Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.