Literature DB >> 20676978

Random mutagenesis by error-prone PCR.

Elizabeth O McCullum1, Berea A R Williams, Jinglei Zhang, John C Chaput.   

Abstract

In vitro selection coupled with directed evolution represents a powerful method for generating nucleic acids and proteins with desired functional properties. Creating high-quality libraries of random sequences is an important step in this process as it allows variants of individual molecules to be generated from a single-parent sequence. These libraries are then screened for individual molecules with interesting, and sometimes very rare, phenotypes. Here, we describe a general method to introduce random nucleotide mutations into a parent sequence that takes advantage of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This protocol reduces mutational bias often associated with error-prone PCR methods and allows the experimenter to control the degree of mutagenesis by controlling the number of gene-doubling events that occur in the PCR reaction. The error-prone PCR method described here was used to optimize a de novo evolved protein for improved folding stability, solubility, and ligand-binding affinity.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676978     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-652-8_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  44 in total

1.  Molecular insights revealing interaction of Tim23 and channel subunits of presequence translocase.

Authors:  Gautam Pareek; Vivekanandhan Krishnamoorthy; Patrick D'Silva
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Cadmium and Secondary Structure-dependent Function of a Degron in the Pca1p Cadmium Exporter.

Authors:  Nathan Smith; Wenzhong Wei; Miaoyun Zhao; Xiaojuan Qin; Javier Seravalli; Heejeong Kim; Jaekwon Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Recent advances in the applications of promoter engineering for the optimization of metabolite biosynthesis.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Liang Wei; Jun Liu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Pareto Optimization of Combinatorial Mutagenesis Libraries.

Authors:  Deeptak Verma; Gevorg Grigoryan; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  US132 Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase Engineering by Random Mutagenesis for an Anti-Staling Purpose.

Authors:  Sonia Jemli; Mouna Jaoua; Samir Bejar
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Evolving the naturally compromised chorismate mutase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis to top performance.

Authors:  Jūratė Fahrig-Kamarauskaitė; Kathrin Würth-Roderer; Helen V Thorbjørnsrud; Susanne Mailand; Ute Krengel; Peter Kast
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Basic leucine zipper transcription factor Hac1 binds DNA in two distinct modes as revealed by microfluidic analyses.

Authors:  Polly M Fordyce; David Pincus; Philipp Kimmig; Christopher S Nelson; Hana El-Samad; Peter Walter; Joseph L DeRisi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Massively parallel single-nucleotide mutagenesis using reversibly terminated inosine.

Authors:  Gabe Haller; David Alvarado; Kevin McCall; Robi D Mitra; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  DR4 specific TRAIL variants are more efficacious than wild-type TRAIL in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Rui Yu; Stella Maris Albarenque; Robbert H Cool; Wim J Quax; Andrea Mohr; Ralf M Zwacka
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 10.  Protein engineering for metabolic engineering: current and next-generation tools.

Authors:  Ryan J Marcheschi; Luisa S Gronenberg; James C Liao
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.