BACKGROUND: The HIV-1 subtype B epidemic in Brazil is peculiar because of the high frequency of isolates having the GWGR tetramer at V3 loop region. It has been suggested that GWGR is a distinct variant and less pathogenic than other subtype B isolates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ninety-four percent of the HIV-1 subtype B worldwide sequences (7689/8131) obtained from the Los Alamos HIV database contain proline at the tetramer of the V3 loop of the env gene (GPGR) and only 0.74% (60/8131) have tryptophan (GWGR). By contrast, 48.4% (161/333) of subtype B isolates from Brazil have proline, 30.6% (102/333) contain tryptophan and 10.5% (35/333) have phenylalanine (F) at the second position of the V3 loop tip. The proportion of tryptophan and phenylalanine in Brazilian isolates is much higher than in worldwide subtype B sequences (chi-square test, p = 0.0001). The combined proportion of proline, tryptophan and phenylalanine (GPGR+GWGR+GFGR) of Brazilian isolates corresponds to 89% of all amino acids in the V3 loop. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that almost all subtype B isolates in Brazil have a common origin regardless of their motif (GWGR, GPGR, GGGR, etc.) at the V3 tetramer. This shared ancestral origin was also observed in CRF28_BF and CRF29_BF in a genome region (free of recombination) derived from parental subtype B. These results imply that tryptophan substitution (e.g., GWGR-to-GxGR), which was previously associated with the change in the coreceptor usage within the host, also occurs at the population level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the current findings and previous study showing that tryptophan and phenylalanine in the V3 loop are related with coreceptor usage, we propose that tryptophan and phenylalanine in subtype B isolates in Brazil are kept by selective mechanisms due to the distinct coreceptor preferences in target cells of GWGR, GFGR and GFGR viruses.
BACKGROUND: The HIV-1 subtype B epidemic in Brazil is peculiar because of the high frequency of isolates having the GWGR tetramer at V3 loop region. It has been suggested that GWGR is a distinct variant and less pathogenic than other subtype B isolates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ninety-four percent of the HIV-1 subtype B worldwide sequences (7689/8131) obtained from the Los Alamos HIV database contain proline at the tetramer of the V3 loop of the env gene (GPGR) and only 0.74% (60/8131) have tryptophan (GWGR). By contrast, 48.4% (161/333) of subtype B isolates from Brazil have proline, 30.6% (102/333) contain tryptophan and 10.5% (35/333) have phenylalanine (F) at the second position of the V3 loop tip. The proportion of tryptophan and phenylalanine in Brazilian isolates is much higher than in worldwide subtype B sequences (chi-square test, p = 0.0001). The combined proportion of proline, tryptophan and phenylalanine (GPGR+GWGR+GFGR) of Brazilian isolates corresponds to 89% of all amino acids in the V3 loop. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that almost all subtype B isolates in Brazil have a common origin regardless of their motif (GWGR, GPGR, GGGR, etc.) at the V3 tetramer. This shared ancestral origin was also observed in CRF28_BF and CRF29_BF in a genome region (free of recombination) derived from parental subtype B. These results imply that tryptophan substitution (e.g., GWGR-to-GxGR), which was previously associated with the change in the coreceptor usage within the host, also occurs at the population level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the current findings and previous study showing that tryptophan and phenylalanine in the V3 loop are related with coreceptor usage, we propose that tryptophan and phenylalanine in subtype B isolates in Brazil are kept by selective mechanisms due to the distinct coreceptor preferences in target cells of GWGR, GFGR and GFGR viruses.
Authors: Gang Meng; Xiping Wei; Xiaoyun Wu; Marty T Sellers; Julie M Decker; Zina Moldoveanu; Jan M Orenstein; Martin F Graham; John C Kappes; Jiri Mestecky; George M Shaw; Phillip D Smith Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: H Blaak; A B van't Wout; M Brouwer; B Hooibrink; E Hovenkamp; H Schuitemaker Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-02-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Miles P Davenport; John J Zaunders; Mette D Hazenberg; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Ronald P van Rij Journal: Trends Microbiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 17.079
Authors: R Shankarappa; J B Margolick; S J Gange; A G Rodrigo; D Upchurch; H Farzadegan; P Gupta; C R Rinaldo; G H Learn; X He; X L Huang; J I Mullins Journal: J Virol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: G Santoro-Lopes; L H Harrison; M D Tavares; A Xexéo; A C Dos Santos; M Schechter Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2000-07-01 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Fernando Lucas Melo; Leda Fátima Jamal; Paolo Marinho de Andrade Zanotto Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Francesco Saladini; Brian T Foley; Andrea Rosi; Ilaria Vicenti; Giulio Nannetti; Genny Meini; Francesca Razzolini; Maurizio Zazzi Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Dennis Maletich Junqueira; Rúbia Marília de Medeiros; Maria Cristina Cotta Matte; Leonardo Augusto Luvison Araújo; Jose Artur Bogo Chies; Patricia Ashton-Prolla; Sabrina Esteves de Matos Almeida Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240