Literature DB >> 20675811

Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks.

Matthias Gondan1, Christina Götze, Mark W Greenlee.   

Abstract

In divided-attention tasks with two classes of target stimuli, participants typically respond more quickly if both targets are presented simultaneously, as compared with single-target presentation (redundant-signals effect). Different explanations exist for this effect, including serial, parallel, and coactivation models of information processing. In two experiments, we investigated redundancy gains in simple and go/no-go responses to auditory-visual stimuli presented with an onset asynchrony. In Experiment 1, go/no-go discrimination was performed for near-threshold and suprathreshold stimuli. Response times in both the simple and go/no-go responses were well explained by a common coactivation model assuming linear superposition of modality-specific activation. In Experiment 2, the go/no-go task was made more difficult. Participants had to respond to high-frequency tones or right-tilted Gabor patches and to withhold their response for low tones and left-tilted Gabors. Redundancy gains were consistent with coactivation models; however, channel-specific buildup of evidence seems to occur at different speeds in the two tasks. Response times of 1 participant support a serial self-terminating model of modality-specific information processing. Supplemental materials for this article may be downloaded from http://app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675811     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

1.  On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.

Authors:  Benjamin Bodmer; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Audiovisual detection at different intensities and delays.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Steven P Blurton; Matthias Gondan
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Can the use of multiple stop signals reduce the disinhibiting effects of alcohol?

Authors:  Melissa A Miller; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Multisensory Stop Signals Can Reduce the Disinhibiting Effects of Alcohol in Adults.

Authors:  Walter Roberts; Ramey G Monem; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Redundant visual signals reduce the intensity of alcohol impairment.

Authors:  Alexandra R D'Agostino; Jaime Brown; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Monkeys and humans share a common computation for face/voice integration.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Luis Lemus; Andrea Trubanova; Matthias Gondan; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Crowdsourced Measurement of Reaction Times to Audiovisual Stimuli With Various Degrees of Asynchrony.

Authors:  Pavlo Bazilinskyy; Joost de Winter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Passive perceptual learning modulates motor inhibitory control in superior frontal regions.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.