Literature DB >> 20675649

Kinematic impact of anteromedial and posterolateral bundle graft fixation angles on double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Colin J Anderson1, Benjamin D Westerhaus, Sean D Pietrini, Connor G Ziegler, Coen A Wijdicks, Steinar Johansen, Lars Engebretsen, Robert F Laprade.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, the range of knee flexion angles that surgeons use for anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle graft fixation spans from 0 degrees to 90 degrees for both bundle grafts. Despite the recent popularity of this procedure, no consensus exists on an optimal set of AM and PL graft fixation angles. HYPOTHESIS: Graft fixation angles that simulate the native tensioning relationship of the AM and PL bundles will produce kinematic results similar to the intact knee, while graft fixation angles that do not simulate this relationship will under- or overconstrain the knee. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Twelve cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested in the intact state, ACL-sectioned state, and a randomized order of 7 double-bundle ACL reconstructed states at multiple graft fixation angle combinations. For each test state, data were collected for 88 N anterior tibial loads, 10 N.m valgus torques, 5 N.m internal rotation torques, and 2 simulated pivot shift loads consisting of a 5 N.m internal rotation torque coupled with either a 10 N.m valgus torque or an 88 N anterior tibial load at 0 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of knee flexion.
RESULTS: The AM and PL graft fixation angle combinations of 0 degrees /0 degrees (AM graft fixation angle/PL graft fixation angle), 60 degrees /0 degrees, 45 degrees /15 degrees, and 75 degrees /15 degrees restored normal laxity to the reconstructed knee in all of the biomechanical tests. The 30 degrees /30 degrees, 60 degrees /60 degrees, and 90 degrees /90 degrees graft fixation angle combinations significantly restricted knee laxity compared with the intact state in various biomechanical tests.
CONCLUSION: We found that as long as the PL bundle graft was fixed between 0 degrees and 15 degrees , the AM graft could be fixed up to 75 degrees without restricting knee laxity. However, fixation of the PL graft at 30 degrees of knee flexion and above significantly overconstrained the knee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides a range of angles that can be used in double-bundle ACL reconstructions to restore normal knee stability without causing overconstraint.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675649     DOI: 10.1177/0363546510364841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of a simulated pivot shift test: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen; Coen A Wijdicks; Colin J Anderson; Benjamin Westerhaus; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Samuel G Moulton; Marco Nitri; Werner Mueller; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Quantifying the pivot shift test: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Basic biomechanic principles of knee instability.

Authors:  Jason P Zlotnicki; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Gerald A Ferrer; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

6.  ACL graft compression: a method to allow reduced tunnel sizes in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Breck R Lord; Henry B Colaco; Chinmay M Gupte; Adrian J Wilson; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Prediction and Validation of Load-Dependent Behavior of the Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Joints During Movement.

Authors:  Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Colin R Smith; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Impact of Partial and complete rupture of anterior cruciate ligament on medial meniscus: A cadavaric study.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Shu-Guang Gao; Kang-Hua Li; Ling Luo; Yu-Sheng Li; Wei Luo; Guang-Hua Lei
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Clinical results of technique for double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hybrid femoral fixation and Retroscrew.

Authors:  Doo-Sup Kim; Chang-Ho Yi; Hoi-Jung Chung; Yeu-Seung Yoon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.