Literature DB >> 20675547

The mechanical power output of the pectoralis muscle of cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus): the in vivo muscle length trajectory and activity patterns and their implications for power modulation.

Charlotte R Morris1, Graham N Askew.   

Abstract

In order to meet the varying demands of flight, pectoralis muscle power output must be modulated. In birds with pectoralis muscles with a homogeneous fibre type composition, power output can be modulated at the level of the motor unit (via changes in muscle length trajectory and the pattern of activation), at the level of the muscle (via changes in the number of motor units recruited), and at the level of the whole animal (through the use of intermittent flight). Pectoralis muscle length trajectory and activity patterns were measured in vivo in the cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus) at a range of flight speeds (0-16 m s(-1)) using sonomicrometry and electromyography. The work loop technique was used to measure the mechanical power output of a bundle of fascicles isolated from the pectoralis muscle during simulated in vivo length change and activity patterns. The mechanical power-speed relationship was U-shaped, with a 2.97-fold variation in power output (40-120 W kg(-1)). In this species, modulation of neuromuscular activation is the primary strategy utilised to modulate pectoralis muscle power output. Maximum in vivo power output was 22% of the maximum isotonic power output (533 W kg(-1)) and was generated at a lower relative shortening velocity (0.28 V(max)) than the maximum power output during isotonic contractions (0.34 V(max)). It seems probable that the large pectoralis muscle strains result in a shift in the optimal relative shortening velocity in comparison with the optimum during isotonic contractions as a result of length-force effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675547     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.035691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  The effect of activation level on muscle function during locomotion: are optimal lengths and velocities always used?

Authors:  N C Holt; E Azizi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Muscle function in avian flight: achieving power and control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Can Strain Dependent Inhibition of Cross-Bridge Binding Explain Shifts in Optimum Muscle Length?

Authors:  N C Holt; C D Williams
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Appendicular Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics in Crocodylus niloticus.

Authors:  Krijn B Michel; Tim G West; Monica A Daley; Vivian R Allen; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-11-05

Review 6.  The role of wingbeat frequency and amplitude in flight power.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Krishnan; Baptiste Garde; Ashley Bennison; Nik C Cole; Emma-L Cole; Jamie Darby; Kyle H Elliott; Adam Fell; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Sophie de Grissac; Mark Jessopp; Emmanouil Lempidakis; Yuichi Mizutani; Aurélien Prudor; Michael Quetting; Flavio Quintana; Hermina Robotka; Alexandre Roulin; Peter G Ryan; Kim Schalcher; Stefan Schoombie; Vikash Tatayah; Fred Tremblay; Henri Weimerskirch; Shannon Whelan; Martin Wikelski; Ken Yoda; Anders Hedenström; Emily L C Shepard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.293

7.  Intra-specific variation in wing morphology and its impact on take-off performance in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) during escape flights.

Authors:  Laura McFarlane; John D Altringham; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.