OBJECTIVE: The incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) is a valuable tool for assessing changes in patients' functional capacity during cardiac rehabilitation. However, studies have only assessed its test-retest reliability in the short term. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term test-retest reliability of the ISWT in clinically stable cardiac patients. DESIGN: Test-retest reliability assessment. SETTING: Continuous, community-based phase IV cardiac rehabilitation centre. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with cardiovascular disease (15 males, 15 females; age 55 to 80 years) volunteered to participate in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Participants undertook two ISWTs, a minimum of 8 weeks apart. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ISWT performance in metres. RESULTS: Overall, the mean distance walked in the pre-test was 502+/-161m and this did not differ from test to retest. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80, indicating good test-retest reliability. Using the Bland and Altman method, there was a small mean test-retest difference (-7m). The 95% limits of agreement were large, ranging from -203m to 189m. CONCLUSIONS: Over long test-retest durations, there appears to be no learning effect in the ISWT, negating the need for a practice walk. The long-term random variation in the ISWT test is larger than in previous studies, probably due to greater physiological and psychological variation in the participants over 8 weeks compared with that seen in day-to-day testing. Factors influencing long-term test-retest reliability of the ISWT require further elucidation. Copyright 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: The incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) is a valuable tool for assessing changes in patients' functional capacity during cardiac rehabilitation. However, studies have only assessed its test-retest reliability in the short term. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term test-retest reliability of the ISWT in clinically stable cardiac patients. DESIGN: Test-retest reliability assessment. SETTING: Continuous, community-based phase IV cardiac rehabilitation centre. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with cardiovascular disease (15 males, 15 females; age 55 to 80 years) volunteered to participate in the study. INTERVENTIONS:Participants undertook two ISWTs, a minimum of 8 weeks apart. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ISWT performance in metres. RESULTS: Overall, the mean distance walked in the pre-test was 502+/-161m and this did not differ from test to retest. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80, indicating good test-retest reliability. Using the Bland and Altman method, there was a small mean test-retest difference (-7m). The 95% limits of agreement were large, ranging from -203m to 189m. CONCLUSIONS: Over long test-retest durations, there appears to be no learning effect in the ISWT, negating the need for a practice walk. The long-term random variation in the ISWT test is larger than in previous studies, probably due to greater physiological and psychological variation in the participants over 8 weeks compared with that seen in day-to-day testing. Factors influencing long-term test-retest reliability of the ISWT require further elucidation. Copyright 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. All rights reserved.