| Literature DB >> 29930662 |
Natacha Angélica da Fonseca Miranda1, Cássia da Luz Goulart1, Audrey Borghi E Silva2, Dannuey Machado Cardoso3, Dulciane Nunes Paiva1, Renata Trimer2, Andréa Lúcia Gonçalves da Silva1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is complex and understanding of it has been changing in recent years, with regard to its multisystemic manifestations, especially peripheral dysfunction and its influence on intolerance to exercise.Entities:
Keywords: COPD; exercise test; exercise tolerance; peripheral arterial disease
Year: 2017 PMID: 29930662 PMCID: PMC5944305 DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.004417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vasc Bras ISSN: 1677-5449
COPD patients’ clinical characteristics and performance in tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, male n (%) | 13 (68.40) | 8 (50.00) | 0.26 |
| Age (years) | 62.84±5.69 | 65.69±8.70 | 0.25 |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Caucasian n (%) | 16 (84.20) | 15 (93.80) | 0.37 |
| Non-caucasian n (%) | 3 (15.80) | 1 (6.30) | 0.37 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.1±6.52 | 26.79±6.64 | 0.47 |
| BMI classification | |||
| Underweight n (%) | 2 (10.50) | 3 (18.80) | 0.41 |
| Normal weight n (%) | 6 (31.60) | 6 (37.50) | 0.49 |
| Obesity n (%) | 11 (57.90) | 7 (43.80) | 0.31 |
| FEV1 (L/s) | 1.15±0.49 | 0.88±0.38 | 0.08 |
| FEV1% predicted | 42.12±16.94 | 37.64±13.77 | 0.40 |
| FEV1/FVC % predicted | 65.14±18.11 | 62.06±19.10 | 0.63 |
| GOLD Classification* | |||
| II n (%) | 5 (26.30) | 3 (18.80) | 0.45 |
| III n (%) | 8 (42.10) | 9 (56.20) | 0.31 |
| IV n (%) | 6 (31.60) | 4 (25.00) | 0.48 |
| Smoking Status | |||
| Current n (%) | 4 (21.1) | 2 (12.4) | 0.41 |
| Former n (%) | 15 (78.9) | 14 (87.6) | 0.70 |
| Smoking cigarettes/Years | 6838.9±3248.3 | 7710.6±2831.7 | 0.41 |
| Claudication Presence | |||
| Yes n (%) | 5 (26.30) | 3 (18.80) | 0.59 |
| Perceived Exertion-Borg Scale | 11.47±2.89 | 12.31±2.72 | 0.38 |
| Modified-Borg Scale Dyspnea Index | 3 (1-7) | 3 (0-8) | 0.81 |
| ABI | 1.02±0.06 | 0.82±0.09 | ≤0.01 |
| HandGrip (kgf) | 33.00 (16.00-52.66) | 26.66 (11.66-32.33) | 0.02 |
| HandGrip. % predicted | 101.76 (49.47-172.53) | 86.46 (41.06-140.15) | 0.09 |
| dISWT (meters) | 297.32±74.62 | 219.41±117.18 | 0.02 |
| dISWT % predicted | 41.98±13.55 | 33.76±16.36 | 0.11 |
| 1RM | |||
| Knee flexion (kg) | 4.08 (1.27-9.24) | 2.40 (1.13-12.70) | 0.39 |
| Knee extension (kg) | 7.92 (1.23-10.20) | 2.72 (1.23-13.60) | 0.44 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (minimum and maximum).
n (%), number sample (frequency); ABI: ankle-brachial index; BMI: body mass index; dISWT: distance incremental shuttle walking test; FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FEV1/FVC: forced expiratory volume in the first second and forced vital capacity; GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Lung Disease1; PAOD: peripheral arterial disease. The Student’s t-test was used when data were normally distributed; otherwise, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used.
Figure 1Relationship between airway obstruction and functional capacity. (A) Correlation between HandGrip and FEV1. •COPD with coexisting PAOD (n = 16). FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second. (B) Correlation between dISWT and FEV1. dISWT: distance in incremental shuttle walking test; The association between the variables was analyzed using Spearman´s correlation test.
Figure 2Relationship between peripheral muscle strength and functional capacity. (A) Correlation between HandGrip and dISWT. •COPD with coexisting PAOD (n = 16). dISWT, distance in incremental shuttle walking test. (B) Correlation between HandGrip and 1 RM/Knee extension. •COPD with coexisting PAOD (n = 9). RM: Repetition maximum. (C) Correlation between dISWT and 1 RM/ Knee extension. •COPD with coexisting PAOD (n = 9). (D) Correlation between dISWT and 1 RM/ Knee flexion. •COPD with coexisting PAOD (n = 9). dISWT, distance in incremental shuttle walking test; RM, repetition maximum. The association between the variables was analyzed using Spearman´s correlation test.
Simple linear regression analysis to predict ABI from distance-ISWT.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 0.783 | < 0.001 | 0.651-0.916 |
| Diswt | 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.000-0.001 |
95%CI: 95% confidence interval; ABI: ankle–brachial index; dISWT: distance in incremental shuttle walking test.
R2 adjusted = 0.153; F = 7.15 (p = 0,012). Predictive equation for ABI: (0.783+0.001x dISTW).