Literature DB >> 20674300

Computed tomography-magnetic resonance image registration in radiotherapy treatment planning.

J N H Brunt1.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being increasingly used in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). MRI has the potential to provide improved localisation of target volumes, leading to better tumour control rates and reduced normal tissue complications, due to capabilities including excellent soft-tissue discrimination and the ability to provide scans in which the image contrast is weighted according to different tissue properties. When computed tomography (CT)-MRI image registration is deployed, MR's advantages are combined with CT's geometrical security and its ability to provide electron density information. The quality of CT-MRI image registration can be favourably influenced by aspects of scan acquisition, including patient positioning/immobilisation and scan protocols. Appropriate protocols can ameliorate the possible presence of MR spatial distortions and other artefacts, but quality assurance of scanning remains essential. Here, the methods and quality assurance of CT-MR image registration are discussed. Developments in MRI scanner technology are progressively offering advantages for RTP, in terms of the possibility of better matching of patient positioning versus CT in a greater range of anatomical regions, while allowing thinner slices for better image quality in reformatted orthogonal planes. Copyright 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674300     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  6 in total

1.  Validation of the CT-MRI image registration with a dedicated phantom.

Authors:  Sofia Spampinato; Anna Maria Gueli; Luigi Raffaele; Concetta Stancampiano; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy in prostate cancer patients with metallic hip prostheses in a UK centre.

Authors:  Wee Loon Ng; John Brunt; Simon Temple; Mohammed Saipillai; Anoop Haridass; Helen Wong; Zafar Malik; Chinnamani Eswar
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-04-14

3.  Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Nathan S White; Gwe-Ya Kim; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Roshan Karunamuni; Deborah Marshall; Dominic Holland; Parag Sanghvi; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; Anders M Dale; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

4.  Commissioning of a new wide-bore MRI scanner for radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G P Liney; S C Owen; A K E Beaumont; V R Lazar; D J Manton; A W Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Practice patterns for the radical treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer by head and neck oncologists in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Imran Petkar; Shreerang Bhide; Kate Newbold; Kevin Harrington; Chris Nutting
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Imposing implicit feasibility constraints on deformable image registration using a statistical generative model.

Authors:  Yudi Sang; Xianglei Xing; Yingnian Wu; Dan Ruan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-12-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.