Literature DB >> 20673971

Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes.

Zhiqing Liang1, Yong Chen, Huicheng Xu, Yuyan Li, Dan Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe our laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) technique and to assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure, as well as its impact on voiding function. We introduce a fascia space dissection technique in order to preserve the pelvic splanchnic nerve, the hypogastric nerve and the bladder branch of the inferior hypogastric plexus under magnification (×10.5) during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) with pelvic lymphadenectomy.
METHODS: From October 2006 to November 2009, 163 consecutive patients with cervical cancer underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy, with 82 women undergoing LNSRH with fascia space dissection technique (LNSRH group) and 81 undergoing LRH (LRH group). Data from 163 patients were prospectively collected and compared. Post-operative assessment of bladder function included the following: the time to recover the ability to void spontaneously and to achieve a post-void residual urine (PVR) volume of less than 50 ml, with urination function graded.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy procedure was completed successfully and was conducted safely in all of the patients. There were no conversions to open surgery in the two groups. The median operative duration in the LNSRH and the LRH groups were 163.52±34.47 min and 132.13±31.42 min, respectively. Blood loss was 142.12±62.38 ml and 187.69±68.63 ml, respectively. The time taken to obtain a post-void residual urine volume of less than 50 ml after removal of the urethral catheter was 7.42±2.35 d (5-18 d) in LNSRH group and was 16.75±7.73 d (5-35 d) in LRH group (P<0.05). The bladder void function recovery to Grades 0-I was 76 (92.7%) for the LNSRH group and 59 (72.8%) for the LRH group. A mean follow-up of 22.3 (5-42) months was adhered to, and no patient had a recurrence or metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique described in this preliminary study appears to be safe, feasible, and easy in our population, with satisfactory recovery of voiding function.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20673971     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

Review 1.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Perioperative betamethasone treatment reduces signs of bladder dysfunction in a rat model for neurapraxia in female urogenital surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Castiglione; Alice Bergamini; Arianna Bettiga; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Fabio Benigni; Frank Strittmatter; Giorgio Gandaglia; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Petter Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Benefit of robot-assisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice Narducci; Pierre Collinet; Benjamin Merlot; Eric Lambaudie; Loic Boulanger; Daniele Lefebvre-Kuntz; Philippe Nickers; Sophie Taieb; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Eric Leblanc
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Urodynamic study of bladder function following nerve sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Maneschi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hee Seung Kim; Keewon Kim; Seung Bum Ryoo; Joung Hwa Seo; Sang Youn Kim; Ji Won Park; Min A Kim; Kyoung Sup Hong; Chang Wook Jeong; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies and their effects on bladder function.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Kazuko Fujiwara; Keiko Ebisawa; Tomonori Hada; Yoshiaki Ota; Masaaki Andou
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  An improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique for cervical cancer using the paravesico-vaginal space as a new surgical landmark.

Authors:  Yuqin Zhang; Tingyan Shi; Sheng Yin; Sining Ma; Di Shi; Jun Guan; Libing Xiang; Yang Liu; Yulan Ren; Deyan Tan; Rongyu Zang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-05

9.  A practical method of using the anatomical space of the vesicouterine ligament for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Lulu Sun; Ting Ni; Yong Huang; Lihua Wang; Jiangjing Yuan; Qiong Fan; Yuhong Li; Yudong Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Long; De-Sheng Yao; Xin-Wei Pan; Ting-Yu Ou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.