Literature DB >> 20673947

Loading of fecal indicator bacteria in North Carolina tidal creek headwaters: hydrographic patterns and terrestrial runoff relationships.

Curtis H Stumpf1, Michael F Piehler, Suzanne Thompson, Rachel T Noble.   

Abstract

In the New River Estuary (NRE) in eastern North Carolina (NC), fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) levels exceed water quality standards, leading to closure of estuarine waters for shellfishing and classification of parts of the estuary as "impaired" per the Clean Water Act section 303(d) list. As a means to investigate fecal contamination and loading of FIB to the NRE, a continuous automated sampler (ISCO) outfitted with flow modules and water quality probes was placed in four first-order tidal creek headwaters. Total storm discharge and bacterial load for Escherichia coli (EC) and Enterococcus spp. (ENT) were calculated using graphical volumetric flow calculations and interpolation of FIB measurements over each storm's duration for 10 storms. Mean total load of 10(9)-10(12) EC and ENT cells (MPN) occurred over the course of each storm. Total storm loading, averaged across all storms, was as much as 30 and 37 times greater than equivalent duration of baseflow loading for EC and ENT, respectively. Within the first 30% of creek storm volume for all storms and all creeks combined, a mean cumulative load of only 37% and 44% of the total EC and ENT cells, respectively, was discharged, indicating these creeks are not demonstrating a 'first flush' scenario for FIB. The median storm Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs) were 6.37 × 10(2) and 2.03 × 10(2) MPN/100 mL, for EC and ENT, respectively, compared with median baseflow concentrations of 1.48 × 10(2) and 4.84 × 10(1) for EC and ENT, respectively, and were significantly different between base and storm flow events. FIB was correlated with TSS (weak), flow rate (strong), and different stages (base, rising, peak, and falling) of the hydrograph (strong). Pollutographs indicate large intra-storm variability of FIB, and the need for more intensive sampling throughout a storm in order to attain accurate FIB contaminant estimates. Instream sediment concentrations ranged from 5 to 478 (MPN/g) and 13 to 776 (MPN/g) for EC and ENT, respectively, indicating sediment as a source, but a minor reservoir. This overall approach for calculating loading in headwater tidal creeks is detailed. Accurate loading characterization of FIB during storms and dry weather conditions, and understanding intra-storm FIB concentrations, is imperative for understanding patterns of water quality impairment, establishing management planning, and developing appropriate mitigation strategies.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20673947     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  10 in total

1.  Elucidation of the tidal influence on bacterial populations in a monsoon influenced estuary through simultaneous observations.

Authors:  Lidita Khandeparker; Ranjith Eswaran; Laxman Gardade; Nishanth Kuchi; Kaushal Mapari; Sneha D Naik; Arga Chandrashekar Anil
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Restructuring of the Aquatic Bacterial Community by Hydric Dynamics Associated with Superstorm Sandy.

Authors:  Nikea Ulrich; Abigail Rosenberger; Colin Brislawn; Justin Wright; Collin Kessler; David Toole; Caroline Solomon; Steven Strutt; Erin McClure; Regina Lamendella
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Limited Influence of Urban Stormwater Runoff on Salt Marsh Platform and Marsh Creek Oxygen Dynamics in Coastal Georgia.

Authors:  William B Savidge; Jonathan Brink; Jackson O Blanton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Use of fallout radionuclides ((7)Be, (210)Pb) to estimate resuspension of Escherichia coli from streambed sediments during floods in a tropical montane catchment.

Authors:  Olivier Ribolzi; Olivier Evrard; Sylvain Huon; Emma Rochelle-Newall; Thierry Henri-des-Tureaux; Norbert Silvera; Chanthamousone Thammahacksac; Oloth Sengtaheuanghoung
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  SNP diversity of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in a South East Queensland waterway, Australia, and associated antibiotic resistance gene profiles.

Authors:  Irani Rathnayake; Megan Hargreaves; Flavia Huygens
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 6.  Abundance and Distribution of Enteric Bacteria and Viruses in Coastal and Estuarine Sediments-a Review.

Authors:  Francis Hassard; Ceri L Gwyther; Kata Farkas; Anthony Andrews; Vera Jones; Brian Cox; Howard Brett; Davey L Jones; James E McDonald; Shelagh K Malham
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Genetic relatedness of faecal coliforms and enterococci bacteria isolated from water and sediments of the Apies River, Gauteng, South Africa.

Authors:  Mutshiene Deogratias Ekwanzala; Akebe Luther King Abia; Eunice Ubomba-Jaswa; Jitendra Keshri; Ndombo Benteke Maggy Momba
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 8.  A review on microbial contaminants in stormwater runoff and outfalls: Potential health risks and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Warish Ahmed; Kerry Hamilton; Simon Toze; Stephen Cook; Declan Page
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 9.  A short review of fecal indicator bacteria in tropical aquatic ecosystems: knowledge gaps and future directions.

Authors:  Emma Rochelle-Newall; Thi Mai Huong Nguyen; Thi Phuong Quynh Le; Oloth Sengtaheuanghoung; Olivier Ribolzi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 6.064

10.  High levels of sewage contamination released from urban areas after storm events: A quantitative survey with sewage specific bacterial indicators.

Authors:  Hayley T Olds; Steven R Corsi; Deborah K Dila; Katherine M Halmo; Melinda J Bootsma; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.