Literature DB >> 20673569

Role of action observation and action in sequence learning and coding.

Arnaud Boutin1, Udo Fries, Stefan Panzer, Charles H Shea, Yannick Blandin.   

Abstract

A complex sequence learning task was used to determine if the type of coding acquired through physical practice (PP), observation of the stimulus (Obs-S), or observation of stimulus and action (Obs-SA) differs between conditions and whether the type of observation influences subsequent learning of the task when physical practice was permitted. Participants in the Obs-S group were permitted to watch the sequentially illuminated stimuli on the screen. In the Obs-SA group participants could see both flexion-extension movements of the model's arm performing the sequence and the sequentially illuminated stimuli on the screen. Participants in the PP group actually performed the 16-element sequence with their dominant right arm. Delayed retention tests and two inter-manual transfer tests were completed following each of two acquisition sessions. First, the data indicated that learning the sequence structure, as revealed by response time per element, occurred similarly irrespective of the initial practice condition. Secondly, the movement sequence appeared to be coded in abstract visual-spatial coordinates resulting in effector-independent performance. Finally, observing the model's action and sequential stimuli allows participants to transfer the perceived aspects of the movement sequence into efficient coordination patterns when additional physical practice is permitted.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20673569     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  17 in total

1.  Specialization in the vicarious learning of novel arbitrary sequences in humans but not orangutans.

Authors:  Elizabeth Renner; Eric M Patterson; Francys Subiaul
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

4.  Fluid intelligence and working memory support dissociable aspects of learning by physical but not observational practice.

Authors:  Dace Apšvalka; Emily S Cross; Richard Ramsey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-05-14

5.  Practice makes transfer of motor skills imperfect.

Authors:  Arnaud Boutin; Arnaud Badets; Robin N Salesse; Udo Fries; Stefan Panzer; Yannick Blandin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-14

6.  A safety mechanism for observational learning.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Arnaud Boutin; Thomas Michelet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

7.  Dissociable contributions of motor-execution and action-observation to intramanual transfer.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Digby Elliott; Matthew Andrew; James W Roberts; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of the model's handedness and observer's viewpoint on observational learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Activity in superior parietal cortex during training by observation predicts asymmetric learning levels across hands.

Authors:  Ori Ossmy; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The coding and inter-manual transfer of movement sequences.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Attila J Kovacs; Stefan Panzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.