BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Fast track surgery (FTS) is a systematical method to accelerate the recovery of surgical patients by reducing the physical and mental trauma stress of them. The research is to investigate the feasibility of FTS application in lung cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 80 cases of lung cancer patients with single leaf lobotomy resection were randomized into two groups. While the experimental group was treated with the conception of FTS, and the control group was treated with the traditional methods. The incident rate of post-operation pain degrees, telecasts, pleural effusion, the post-operation time stay in hospital time and the total cost during hospitalization in two groups were compared respectively. RESULTS: In FTS group: the VAS score of post-operation pain at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h all significantly decreased compared to the traditional therapy group. The incidence rate of telecast was 10.53%. The incidence rate of pleural effusion was 26.31%. The length of stay after operation was (4 +/- 1) d and the total cost was RMB 15 600 +/- 7 600. In the control group, the above values were 77.78%, 33.33%, 22.22%, (9 +/- 1) d, RMB 23 600 +/- 5 400, respectively. The post operation pain (VAS method) of FTS group was remarkablely below the control group. There has significant difference of the incident rate of telecasts, stay time in hospital and the total cast in two groups (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the incident rate ofpleural effusion. CONCLUSION: The new methods of FTS can apparently accelerates recovery after lung cancer resection, reduces complications, shorten timestay in hospital and cut down the total cost.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fast track surgery (FTS) is a systematical method to accelerate the recovery of surgical patients by reducing the physical and mental trauma stress of them. The research is to investigate the feasibility of FTS application in lung cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 80 cases of lung cancerpatients with single leaf lobotomy resection were randomized into two groups. While the experimental group was treated with the conception of FTS, and the control group was treated with the traditional methods. The incident rate of post-operation pain degrees, telecasts, pleural effusion, the post-operation time stay in hospital time and the total cost during hospitalization in two groups were compared respectively. RESULTS: In FTS group: the VAS score of post-operation pain at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h all significantly decreased compared to the traditional therapy group. The incidence rate of telecast was 10.53%. The incidence rate of pleural effusion was 26.31%. The length of stay after operation was (4 +/- 1) d and the total cost was RMB 15 600 +/- 7 600. In the control group, the above values were 77.78%, 33.33%, 22.22%, (9 +/- 1) d, RMB 23 600 +/- 5 400, respectively. The post operation pain (VAS method) of FTS group was remarkablely below the control group. There has significant difference of the incident rate of telecasts, stay time in hospital and the total cast in two groups (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the incident rate ofpleural effusion. CONCLUSION: The new methods of FTS can apparently accelerates recovery after lung cancer resection, reduces complications, shorten timestay in hospital and cut down the total cost.
Pain degree comparisons of Fast track surgery group and Traditional therapy group
Groups
1 h
6 h
12 h
24 h
48 h
Fast track surgery group (n=38)
1.80±1.13
1.91±0.98
1.73±0.95
1.68±0.65
1.69±0.90
Traditional therapy group (n=36)
7.00±1.56
7.41±0.93
6.82±1.12
6. 65±0.76
6.34±0.88
P
0.002
0.005
0.010
0.023
0.031
3
快速康复外科治疗组和传统治疗组肺不张、胸腔积液发生情况、住院时间经及住院总费用的比较
Comparisons of telecasts, pleural effusion, total cast stay in hospital of Fast track surgery group and Traditional therapy group
Items
Fast track surgery group (n=38)
Traditional therapy group (n=36)
P
Telecasts (n)
4
12
0.035
Pleural effusion (n)
10
8
0.223
Time stay in hospital (d)
4±1
9±1
0.021
Total cost stay in hospital (RMB)
15 600 ±7 600
23 600 ±5 400
0.024
快速康复外科治疗组和传统治疗组术后疼痛VAS评分比较Pain degree comparisons of Fast track surgery group and Traditional therapy group快速康复外科治疗组和传统治疗组肺不张、胸腔积液发生情况、住院时间经及住院总费用的比较Comparisons of telecasts, pleural effusion, total cast stay in hospital of Fast track surgery group and Traditional therapy groupFTS组肺不张发生率为10.53%, 低于传统治疗组(33.33%), 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);而FTS组胸腔积液发生率为26.31%, 与传统治疗组(22.22%)相比差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);FTS组术后住院时间[(4±1)d], 住院总费用[(1.56 ±0.76)万元]均低于传统治疗组, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
Authors: E Søreide; L I Eriksson; G Hirlekar; H Eriksson; S W Henneberg; R Sandin; J Raeder Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: Dileep N Lobo; Kate A Bostock; Keith R Neal; Alan C Perkins; Brian J Rowlands; Simon P Allison Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-05-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Fernando C Abrão; Sabrina Araujo de França; Igor R L B de Abreu; João Carlos das Neves Pereira; Emílio C Del Massa; Andréa Oliver; Maria Gabriela C Cavalcante Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 2.895