Literature DB >> 20671983

Task effects on BOLD signal correlates of implicit syntactic processing.

David Caplan1.   

Abstract

BOLD signal was measured in sixteen participants who made timed font change detection judgments in visually presented sentences that varied in syntactic structure and the order of animate and inanimate nouns. Behavioral data indicated that sentences were processed to the level of syntactic structure. BOLD signal increased in visual association areas bilaterally and left supramarginal gyrus in the contrast of sentences with object- and subject-extracted relative clauses without font changes in which the animacy order of the nouns biased against the syntactically determined meaning of the sentence. This result differs from the findings in a non-word detection task (Caplan et al, 2008a), in which the same contrast led to increased BOLD signal in the left inferior frontal gyrus. The difference in areas of activation indicates that the sentences were processed differently in the two tasks. These differences were further explored in an eye tracking study using the materials in the two tasks. Issues pertaining to how parsing and interpretive operations are affected by a task that is being performed, and how this might affect BOLD signal correlates of syntactic contrasts, are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20671983      PMCID: PMC2909766          DOI: 10.1080/01690961003672447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  55 in total

1.  The neural bases of strategy and skill in sentence-picture verification.

Authors:  E D Reichle; P A Carpenter; M A Just
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: insights from ERPs and fMRI.

Authors:  C J Fiebach; M Schlesewsky; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

3.  The neural reality of syntactic transformations: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Talma Hendler; Itamar Kahn; Dafna Ben-Bashat; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

4.  An FMRI study of syntactic adaptation.

Authors:  U Noppeney; C J Price
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Determinants of bold signal correlates of processing object-extracted relative clauses.

Authors:  Evan Chen; W Caroline West; Gloria Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

7.  Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  D Caplan; N Alpert; G Waters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Working memory and syntax interact in Broca's area.

Authors:  Andrea Santi; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A functional neuroimaging investigation of the roles of structural complexity and task-demand during auditory sentence processing.

Authors:  Tracy Love; Frank Haist; Janet Nicol; David Swinney
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Effects of tasks on BOLD signal responses to sentence contrasts: Review and commentary.

Authors:  David Caplan; David Gow
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski; Eduardo Europa; David Caplan; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Flexible composition: MEG evidence for the deployment of basic combinatorial linguistic mechanisms in response to task demands.

Authors:  Douglas K Bemis; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neural correlates of processing passive sentences.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; Elena Barbieri; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2013-08-02

5.  Task-dependency and structure-dependency in number interference effects in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Julie Franck; Saveria Colonna; Luigi Rizzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.