Literature DB >> 20669781

Research at the auction block: Problems for the fair benefits approach to international research.

Alex John London, Kevin J S Zollman.   

Abstract

The "fair benefits" approach to international research is designed to produce results that all can agree are fair without taking a stand on divisive questions of justice. But its appealing veneer of collaboration masks ambiguities at both a conceptual and an operational level. An attempt to put it into practice would look a lot like an auction, leaving little reason to think the outcomes will satisfy even minimal conditions of fairness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20669781     DOI: 10.1353/hcr.0.0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  17 in total

1.  Involving Communities in Deciding What Benefits They Receive in Multinational Research.

Authors:  David Wendler; Seema Shah
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 2.  What Do the Various Principles of Justice Mean Within the Concept of Benefit Sharing?

Authors:  Bege Dauda; Yvonne Denier; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Nonconsensual clinical trials: a foreseeable risk of offshoring under global corporatism.

Authors:  Bethany Spielman
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Sharing the benefits of research fairly: two approaches.

Authors:  Joseph Millum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Defining and Negotiating the Social Value of Research in Public Health Facilities: Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Research-Active Province of South Africa.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lutge; Catherine Slack; Douglas Wassenaar
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 6.  [Globalization in medical research].

Authors:  H-J Ehni; U Wiesing
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Philosophical Foundations of Human Research Ethics.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 0.941

8.  Ancillary care in South African HIV vaccine trials: addressing needs, drafting protocols, and engaging community.

Authors:  Catherine M Slack
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Benefits and payments for research participants: experiences and views from a research centre on the Kenyan coast.

Authors:  Sassy Molyneux; Stephen Mulupi; Lairumbi Mbaabu; Vicki Marsh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Forms of benefit sharing in global health research undertaken in resource poor settings: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in Kenya.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Lairumbi; Michael Parker; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Michael C English
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.