Literature DB >> 28060430

Defining and Negotiating the Social Value of Research in Public Health Facilities: Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Research-Active Province of South Africa.

Elizabeth Lutge, Catherine Slack, Douglas Wassenaar.   

Abstract

This article reports on qualitative research conducted in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, among researchers and gate-keepers of health facilities in the province. Results suggest disparate but not irreconcilable perceptions of the social value of research in provincial health facilities. This study found that researchers tended to emphasize the contribution of research to the generation of knowledge and to the health of future patients while gate-keepers of health facilities tended to emphasize its contribution to the healthcare system and to current patients. Furthermore, relations between research stakeholders were perceived to be somewhat fragile, making it difficult for stakeholders to achieve consensus about the social value of research, as well as on ways to maximize value. Interventions to negotiate a shared perspective on the social value of research would appear to be warranted, and the findings of this study suggest some focus areas for such intervention.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aspirational benefits; collateral benefits; gatekeepers; researchers; social value

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28060430      PMCID: PMC5235320          DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  31 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries.

Authors:  S R Benatar
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The fair benefits approach revisited.

Authors:  Reidar K Lie
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women.

Authors:  Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim; Janet A Frohlich; Anneke C Grobler; Cheryl Baxter; Leila E Mansoor; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Sengeziwe Sibeko; Koleka P Mlisana; Zaheen Omar; Tanuja N Gengiah; Silvia Maarschalk; Natasha Arulappan; Mukelisiwe Mlotshwa; Lynn Morris; Douglas Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis.

Authors:  Julie Green; Karen Willis; Emma Hughes; Rhonda Small; Nicky Welch; Lisa Gibbs; Jeanne Daly
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.939

6.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  'It looks like you just want them when things get rough': civil society perspectives on negative trial results and stakeholder engagement in HIV prevention trials.

Authors:  Jennifer Koen; Zaynab Essack; Catherine Slack; Graham Lindegger; Peter A Newman
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.294

8.  Community members' engagement with and involvement in genomic research: lessons to learn from the field.

Authors:  Morenike O Folayan; Kolawole S Oyedeji; Olawunmi A Fatusi
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.294

9.  Racial differences in public perceptions of voluntariness of medical research participants in South Africa.

Authors:  Nicola Wendy Barsdorf; Douglas Richard Wassenaar
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Moral imagination: the missing component in global health.

Authors:  Solomon R Benatar
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  3 in total

1.  A CTSA One Health Alliance guidance on institutional review of veterinary clinical studies.

Authors:  A O'Kell; H Borghese; S A Moore; R Garabed; H O'Meara; P Baneux
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 2.  Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.

Authors:  Nelson K Sewankambo; Paul Kutyabami
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 10.485

3.  Collaborative partnership and the social value of clinical research: a qualitative secondary analysis.

Authors:  Sanna-Maria Nurmi; Arja Halkoaho; Mari Kangasniemi; Anna-Maija Pietilä
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.