Literature DB >> 20668973

Ethical choice in the medical applications of information theory.

Scott V Haig1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alongside advances in medical information technology (IT), there is mounting physician and patient dissatisfaction with present-day clinical practice. The effect of introducing increasingly complex medical IT on the ethical dimension of the clinical physician's primary task (identified as direct patient care) can be scrutinized through analysis of the EMR software platform. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore (1) identify IT changes burdensome to the clinician in performing patient care and which therefore lower quality of care; and (2) suggest methods for clinicians to maintain high quality patient care as IT demands increase.
METHODS: Elemental relationships from information theory and physical chemistry are applied to the profit-generating creation and flow of medical information between patients, physicians, administrators, suppliers, and insurers. Ethical implications for patient care and the doctor-patient relationship are drawn in the light of these relationships. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Little has been accomplished, or even discussed, regarding limiting healthcare IT growth. Quality of patient care is expected to suffer unless physicians carefully scrutinize, refine and occasionally reject portions of the increasing healthcare IT burden being placed upon them. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: Better medicine, simply understood as more effective prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal disease, is our professional goal. We need to establish mechanisms whereby we can limit, control or even reverse IT changes that hinder this goal. Clinicians must confront the negative impact many healthcare IT changes have on patient care. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: Suggestions for maintaining high standards of practice in the face of the new IT burden include: (1) Increasing IT time-awareness. Clinicians should examine actual time spent in clinical versus computer-based activity and implement changes if that ratio is too high. (2) Increasing IT goal awareness. (3) Examine the software creating a medical record to see how much of what it records is there for financial, as opposed to medical reasons. Is the software helping my patient or someone else's bottom line? Is it for talking to colleagues about sick people or to insurance companies?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20668973      PMCID: PMC3049638          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1466-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  4 in total

1.  Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Steffie Woolhandler; Terry Campbell; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs.

Authors:  Richard Hillestad; James Bigelow; Anthony Bower; Federico Girosi; Robin Meili; Richard Scoville; Roger Taylor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  The fate of medical knowledge and the neurosciences during the time of Genghis Khan and the Mongolian Empire.

Authors:  Sam Safavi-Abbasi; Leonardo B C Brasiliense; Ryan K Workman; Melanie C Talley; Iman Feiz-Erfan; Nicholas Theodore; Robert F Spetzler; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  No small change for the health information economy.

Authors:  Kenneth D Mandl; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Adapting Technological Interventions to Meet the Needs of Priority Populations.

Authors:  Sarah E Linke; Britta A Larsen; Becky Marquez; Andrea Mendoza-Vasconez; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 8.194

2.  The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.