Literature DB >> 12930930

Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada.

Steffie Woolhandler1, Terry Campbell, David U Himmelstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A decade ago, the administrative costs of health care in the United States greatly exceeded those in Canada. We investigated whether the ascendancy of computerization, managed care, and the adoption of more businesslike approaches to health care have decreased administrative costs.
METHODS: For the United States and Canada, we calculated the administrative costs of health insurers, employers' health benefit programs, hospitals, practitioners' offices, nursing homes, and home care agencies in 1999. We analyzed published data, surveys of physicians, employment data, and detailed cost reports filed by hospitals, nursing homes, and home care agencies. In calculating the administrative share of health care spending, we excluded retail pharmacy sales and a few other categories for which data on administrative costs were unavailable. We used census surveys to explore trends over time in administrative employment in health care settings. Costs are reported in U.S. dollars.
RESULTS: In 1999, health administration costs totaled at least 294.3 billion dollars in the United States, or 1,059 dollars per capita, as compared with 307 dollars per capita in Canada. After exclusions, administration accounted for 31.0 percent of health care expenditures in the United States and 16.7 percent of health care expenditures in Canada. Canada's national health insurance program had overhead of 1.3 percent; the overhead among Canada's private insurers was higher than that in the United States (13.2 percent vs. 11.7 percent). Providers' administrative costs were far lower in Canada. Between 1969 and 1999, the share of the U.S. health care labor force accounted for by administrative workers grew from 18.2 percent to 27.3 percent. In Canada, it grew from 16.0 percent in 1971 to 19.1 percent in 1996. (Both nations' figures exclude insurance-industry personnel.)
CONCLUSIONS: The gap between U.S. and Canadian spending on health care administration has grown to 752 dollars per capita. A large sum might be saved in the United States if administrative costs could be trimmed by implementing a Canadian-style health care system. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930930     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa022033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  82 in total

1.  The high costs of for-profit care.

Authors:  Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The TSX Gives a Short Course in Health Economics: It's the Prices, Stupid!

Authors:  Robert G Evans
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-11

3.  Analyzing national health reform strategies with a dynamic simulation model.

Authors:  Bobby Milstein; Jack Homer; Gary Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Competition in a publicly funded healthcare system.

Authors:  Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-01

5.  Private provision in the UK National Health Service. The case against private provision in the NHS.

Authors:  Allyson Pollock
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The doctors' prescription: national health insurance.

Authors:  Oliver Fein
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-04-06

Review 7.  Comparing healthcare systems: outcomes, ethical principles, and social values.

Authors:  Eike-Henner W Kluge
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-11-07

8.  Readers respond to "Beyond a dying private health insurance industry: a hidden solution in plain view".

Authors:  Shaheen E Lakhan; John A Lanzalotti
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-12-12

9.  Impact of clinical pathways in surgery.

Authors:  Markus K Müller; Konstantin J Dedes; Daniel Dindo; Stefan Steiner; Dieter Hahnloser; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  What works and what doesn't work well in the US healthcare system.

Authors:  Harold S Luft
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.