BACKGROUND: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) is a transcription factor that is a critical mediator of the cellular response to hypoxia. Enhanced levels of HIF-1alpha, the oxygen-regulated subunit of HIF-1, is often associated with increased tumour angiogenesis, metastasis, therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis. It is in this context that we previously demonstrated that under hypoxia, bcl-2 protein promotes HIF-1/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-mediated tumour angiogenesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: By using human melanoma cell lines and their stable or transient derivative bcl-2 overexpressing cells, the current study identified HIF-1alpha protein stabilization as a key regulator for the induction of HIF-1 by bcl-2 under hypoxia. We also demonstrated that bcl-2-induced accumulation of HIF-1alpha protein during hypoxia was not due to an increased gene transcription or protein synthesis. In fact, it was related to a modulation of HIF-1alpha protein expression at a post-translational level, indeed its degradation rate was faster in the control lines than in bcl-2 transfectants. The bcl-2-induced HIF-1alpha stabilization in response to low oxygen tension conditions was achieved through the impairment of ubiquitin-dependent HIF-1alpha degradation involving the molecular chaperone HSP90, but it was not dependent on the prolyl hydroxylation of HIF-1alpha protein. We also showed that bcl-2, HIF-1alpha and HSP90 proteins form a tri-complex that may contribute to enhancing the stability of the HIF-1alpha protein in bcl-2 overexpressing clones under hypoxic conditions. Finally, by using genetic and pharmacological approaches we proved that HSP90 is involved in bcl-2-dependent stabilization of HIF-1alpha protein during hypoxia, and in particular the isoform HSP90beta is the main player in this phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We identified the stabilization of HIF-1alpha protein as a mechanism through which bcl-2 induces the activation of HIF-1 in hypoxic tumour cells involving the beta isoform of molecular chaperone HSP90.
BACKGROUND: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) is a transcription factor that is a critical mediator of the cellular response to hypoxia. Enhanced levels of HIF-1alpha, the oxygen-regulated subunit of HIF-1, is often associated with increased tumour angiogenesis, metastasis, therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis. It is in this context that we previously demonstrated that under hypoxia, bcl-2 protein promotes HIF-1/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-mediated tumour angiogenesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: By using human melanoma cell lines and their stable or transient derivative bcl-2 overexpressing cells, the current study identified HIF-1alpha protein stabilization as a key regulator for the induction of HIF-1 by bcl-2 under hypoxia. We also demonstrated that bcl-2-induced accumulation of HIF-1alpha protein during hypoxia was not due to an increased gene transcription or protein synthesis. In fact, it was related to a modulation of HIF-1alpha protein expression at a post-translational level, indeed its degradation rate was faster in the control lines than in bcl-2 transfectants. The bcl-2-induced HIF-1alpha stabilization in response to low oxygen tension conditions was achieved through the impairment of ubiquitin-dependent HIF-1alpha degradation involving the molecular chaperone HSP90, but it was not dependent on the prolyl hydroxylation of HIF-1alpha protein. We also showed that bcl-2, HIF-1alpha and HSP90 proteins form a tri-complex that may contribute to enhancing the stability of the HIF-1alpha protein in bcl-2 overexpressing clones under hypoxic conditions. Finally, by using genetic and pharmacological approaches we proved that HSP90 is involved in bcl-2-dependent stabilization of HIF-1alpha protein during hypoxia, and in particular the isoform HSP90beta is the main player in this phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We identified the stabilization of HIF-1alpha protein as a mechanism through which bcl-2 induces the activation of HIF-1 in hypoxic tumour cells involving the beta isoform of molecular chaperone HSP90.
The transcription factor Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) regulates the expression
of more than 70 genes involved in tumour angiogenesis, metabolic switch to anaerobic
glycolysis, pro-survival, proliferative and apoptotic mechanisms [1].
Overall, the expression of HIF-1 target genes helps cells to adapt to, and thereby
survive in, a stressful microenvironment. The activity of HIF-1 dimer, which is
composed of α and β subunits, is modulated by the availability of
the extremely labile oxygen-sensitive HIF-1α protein subunit. HIF-1 activity
depends on the inhibition of the post-transcriptional hydroxylation of the subunit
α by prolyl hydroxylases PHD1-3 and Factor Inhibiting HIF-1 (FIH-1).
PHDs-mediated hydroxylation targets HIF-1α for proteasomal degradation via
the ubiquitination-dependent Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) complex, while FIH-1-mediated
hydroxylation leads to the inhibition of HIF-1 transactivation. The activity of
PHD1-3 enzymes is dependent on substrates oxygen and 2-oxoglutarate, a Krebs cycle
intermediate, and cofactor Fe2+; thus, under hypoxic conditions,
PHDs are less active due to the substrate-limiting conditions. The regulation of
HIF-1α stability by an oxygen-independent degradation pathway was also
reported: the molecular chaperone Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) binds and stabilizes
HIF-1α, competing with Receptor of Activated protein Kinase C (RACK1), which
mediates prolyl hydroxylase/VHL-independent ubiquitination and proteasomal
degradation of HIF-1α [2]. Other post-translational modifications of
HIF-1α, such as acetylation, phosphorylation and nitrosylation, were also
reported, despite contradictory results with regard to their effect on
HIF-1α protein stability and transcriptional activity [3]–[6]. Adding
to the complexity of HIF-1α regulation, it has recently been shown that the
SUMOylation of HIF-1α enables the hydroxylation-independent binding and
subsequent degradation of HIF-1α by the VHL-E3 ligase complex [7].Although hypoxia is considered the main stimulus that drives HIF-1 function, a number
of non-hypoxic stimuli allows the formation of an active HIF-1 complex in many types
of human cancers. Effectors implicated in stimulating or suppressing an immune
response promote HIF-1α transcription [8]–[10], whereas
some autocrine growth factors enhance translation of the HIF-1α protein
[1].
Indeed, the loss of function of tumour suppressors and the gain of function of
oncogenes also regulate different steps that lead to HIF-1 activation [1], [11]. In
this context we also found that overexpression of the anti-apoptotic and
pro-survival protein bcl-2, in human melanoma and breast carcinoma cells, under
hypoxia, enhances HIF-1α protein expression and HIF-1 activity consequently
leading to angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [12],
[13]. Moreover, the treatment of melanoma cells with a
bcl-2/bcl-xL antisense oligonucleotide exterts antiangiogenic activity [14]. We
also demonstrated that bcl-2 plays a role, in cooperation to hypoxia, in cell
migration and invasion, contributing to tumour progression [15], [16].
Indeed, a significant positive correlation between the expression levels of
HIF-1α and bcl-2 was found in neuroblastoma [17].This study thoroughly investigated the mechanism by which bcl-2 regulates HIF-1 in
tumour cells exposed to hypoxic conditions. It identified the stabilization of
HIF-1α protein as a mechanism by which bcl-2 induces the activation of HIF-1
in hypoxic melanoma cells, through the impairment of ubiquitin-dependent
HIF-1α degradation with the involvement of the β isoform of the
molecular chaperone HSP90.
Results
bcl-2 modulation regulates HIF-1α protein expression in conditions
strictly dependent on oxygen availability
We have previously reported that bcl-2 overexpression in human breast carcinoma
and melanoma cell lines increases HIF-1 expression and activity and VEGF
secretion under hypoxic conditions [12], [13],
[18]. The ability of bcl-2 to modulate VEGF
expression under hypoxia has been also extended to several other human melanoma
cell lines (). The relevance of HIF-1α as the main mediator of bcl-2 induced
VEGF secretion under hypoxic conditions has been demonstrated using siRNA
directed to HIF-1α in M14 cells stably transfected with bcl-2 expression
vector (). In fact, the down-regulation of HIF-1α protein reduced VEGF
expression both in control cells and bcl-2 overexpressing clones. Interestingly,
after HIF-1α reduction, VEGF levels secreted by bcl-2 transfectants were
similar to those ones of control cells (). To evaluate whether down-regulation of bcl-2 shows opposite effect of
bcl-2 overexpression in terms of HIF-1α protein expression, we silenced
the endogenous expression of bcl-2 gene transfecting M14 cells with
siRNA-targeting bcl-2 mRNA (si-bcl-2) and then exposing them to normoxia or
hypoxia for 24 h. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the delivery of
si-bcl-2 reduced expression of bcl-2 protein (
) while, as expected, the transfection of a scrambled si-RNA (si-contr)
did not have any effect on bcl-2 protein expression when compared to
untransfected parental cell line (data not shown). Then, we evaluated the impact
of reduced bcl-2 expression on HIF-1α protein expression. As expected,
HIF-1α protein was undetectable in all cells under normoxic conditions,
while an increased HIF-1α protein expression was observed in the cells
exposed to si-contr under hypoxia, but not in the cells after down-regulation of
the bcl-2 protein expression (
).
Figure 1
bcl-2 modulation regulates HIF-1α protein expression in
conditions strictly dependent on oxygen avaibility.
(A) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α and bcl-2 protein expression
in total extracts of M14 cells transfected with siRNA targeting bcl-2
mRNA (si-bcl-2) or with a control scrambled si-RNA (si-contr) and then
exposed to normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. (B) Western blot analysis of
HIF-1α and HIF-1β protein expression in total extracts
of M14 control (puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37)
cells plated under low (sparse) or high (dense) cell density conditions,
or cultured under normoxia for 4 days or under hypoxia for 24 h. Western
blot analysis of HIF-1α and HIF-1β protein expression in
total extracts of the cells plated under high cell density conditions
and (C) exposed to 24 h shaking or (D) cultured with different volumes
of medium. (E) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α and
HIF-1β protein expression in total extracts of cells exposed to
Insulin (100 nM) or Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF, 20 ng/ml) for 24 h.
(A–E) β-actin protein amounts are used to check equal
loading and transfer of proteins. Western blot analyses representative
of two independent experiments with similar results are shown.
bcl-2 modulation regulates HIF-1α protein expression in
conditions strictly dependent on oxygen avaibility.
(A) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α and bcl-2 protein expression
in total extracts of M14 cells transfected with siRNA targeting bcl-2
mRNA (si-bcl-2) or with a control scrambled si-RNA (si-contr) and then
exposed to normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. (B) Western blot analysis of
HIF-1α and HIF-1β protein expression in total extracts
of M14 control (puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37)
cells plated under low (sparse) or high (dense) cell density conditions,
or cultured under normoxia for 4 days or under hypoxia for 24 h. Western
blot analysis of HIF-1α and HIF-1β protein expression in
total extracts of the cells plated under high cell density conditions
and (C) exposed to 24 h shaking or (D) cultured with different volumes
of medium. (E) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α and
HIF-1β protein expression in total extracts of cells exposed to
Insulin (100 nM) or Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF, 20 ng/ml) for 24 h.
(A–E) β-actin protein amounts are used to check equal
loading and transfer of proteins. Western blot analyses representative
of two independent experiments with similar results are shown.To further characterize the impact of bcl-2 on HIF-1α expression, we
evaluated whether bcl-2 overexpression was able to cooperate with other stimuli,
beyond hypoxia, known to modulate HIF-1 α expression [1].
Firstly, we verified if increased cell density affected the level of
HIF-1α protein in M14 cells stably transfected with empty vector (puro)
and in their two derivative stably bcl-2 overexpressing clones (Bcl2/5,
Bcl2/37). As shown in
, while HIF-1α protein is detectable at same extent in all cell
lines plated at low density (sparse), regardless of bcl-2 expression, an
increased HIF-1α protein expression was observed in bcl-2 transfectants,
compared to the control line, either when they were plated at high density
(dense) or when they reached high cell density (4 days of culture) and, as
expected and previously reported [12], [18], in hypoxic conditions. HIF-1β was
constitutively expressed in the cells, and none of those stimuli modulated its
expression. Nuclear translocation of HIF-1α subunit is a necessary step
for HIF-1 transcriptional activity through its association with HIF-1β,
which is constitutively localized in the nucleus [1]. In our
experimental model, high cell density conditions induced the nuclear expression
of HIF-1α in bcl-2 overexpressing clones while its expression was
undetectable in control cells (). In parallel, control cells and bcl-2 overexpressing clones exhibited
density-dependent induction of the HIF-1-dependent transcriptional activity
under normoxic conditions of about 2.3 fold
(p = 0.039) while HRE-dependent transcriptional
activity was not found to be significantly changed in control cells
(p = 0.49) ().To further investigate the induction of HIF-1α protein observed in bcl-2
transfectants under high cell density conditions, we evaluated whether the
creation of a local hypoxic microenvironment could be responsible for
HIF-1α induction. Hence, the cells were cultured at high density and
gently shaked to disrupt any potential oxygen gradient due to the inter-cellular
environment and to ensure a homogenous oxygen concentration within the cell
culture medium. As depicted in
, the gentle shaking drastically reduced the high density-dependent
HIF-1α induction in bcl-2 transfectants, thus indicating that oxygen
pericellular gradient is an important factor contributing in the increase of
HIF-1α expression by bcl-2 in high cell density conditions. To confirm
these results, we plated cells in high density conditions with decreasing
volumes of medium, to enhance the oxygen exchange rate. As shown in
, the decrease of culture medium volume from 4 to 1 ml determined a
medium volume-dependent reduction of HIF-1α protein expression in both
bcl-2 transfectants.Next, we evaluated whether any differences existed between control cells and
bcl-2 overexpressing clones in terms of HIF-1α induction in response to
growth-factor stimulation, another condition that induces hypoxia-independent
HIF-1α expression even in normoxia [19]. As shown in
, both insulin and the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) induced
HIF-1α protein expression in all the cells under normoxia but more
importantly no difference in the levels of HIF-1α protein was observed
in bcl-2 transfectants compared to control cells.
bcl-2 promotes HIF-1α protein stability preventing its
ubiquitin-mediated degradation
Since bcl-2 overexpression in melanoma cells under hypoxia did not alter
HIF-1α mRNA levels [12], we investigated the impact of bcl-2
overexpression on HIF-1α protein stabilization under hypoxia. Firstly,
we performed time course experiments to study the kinetics of HIF-1α
protein induction in control cells and bcl-2 overexpressing clones. As shown in
(left and right panels), exposure of cells to hypoxia determined a
HIF-1α protein induction, at a greater extent in bcl-2 transfectants
compared to control cells, as previously reported. In particular, HIF-1α
protein level reached the maximum value at 24 h of hypoxia in all cell lines,
but it decreased at later time point of 48 h, slower in bcl-2 overexpressing
clones than in control cells.
Figure 2
bcl-2 promotes HIF-1α protein stability preventing its
ubiquitin-mediated degradation.
(A) Western blot analysis (left panel) and quantification (right panel)
of HIF-1α protein expression in M14 control (puro) and bcl-2
stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones exposed to hypoxia for
the indicated time. (B) Pulse analysis of HIF-1α protein
synthesis rate in cells exposed to
[35S]–labeled methionine and
cysteine for the indicated time. (C) Western blot analysis (left panel)
and quantification (right panel) of HIF-1α protein expression in
cells exposed to hypoxia for 24 h and then treated with Cyclohexamide
(CHX, 50 µg/ml) for the indicated time. (D) Pulse-chase
analysis of HIF-1α protein (left panel) and quantification
(right panel) in cells plated under dense conditions, pulsed for 45 min
with [35S]–labeled methionine and
cysteine and chased for the indicated time. (B,D) Whole cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HIF-1α antibody and
subjected to SDS-PAGE. (E) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α
ubiquitination in the cells exposed to MG132 (10 µM, 6 h) or
to hypoxia for 24 h. Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP)
with anti-HIF-1α antibody and then the Western blot analysis was
performed using anti-Ubiquitin antibody. (A,C) β-actin protein
amounts are used to check equal loading and transfer of proteins and to
quantify relative HIF-1α protein levels. (A–E) Western
blot, pulse and pulse-chase analyses representative of two independent
experiments with similar results are shown. (A,C,D) Densitometric
analysis (right panel) of the relative Western blot or Pulse-chase
analysis (left panel) was performed using Molecular Analyst Software and
normalized with relative controls.
bcl-2 promotes HIF-1α protein stability preventing its
ubiquitin-mediated degradation.
(A) Western blot analysis (left panel) and quantification (right panel)
of HIF-1α protein expression in M14 control (puro) and bcl-2
stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones exposed to hypoxia for
the indicated time. (B) Pulse analysis of HIF-1α protein
synthesis rate in cells exposed to
[35S]–labeled methionine and
cysteine for the indicated time. (C) Western blot analysis (left panel)
and quantification (right panel) of HIF-1α protein expression in
cells exposed to hypoxia for 24 h and then treated with Cyclohexamide
(CHX, 50 µg/ml) for the indicated time. (D) Pulse-chase
analysis of HIF-1α protein (left panel) and quantification
(right panel) in cells plated under dense conditions, pulsed for 45 min
with [35S]–labeled methionine and
cysteine and chased for the indicated time. (B,D) Whole cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HIF-1α antibody and
subjected to SDS-PAGE. (E) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α
ubiquitination in the cells exposed to MG132 (10 µM, 6 h) or
to hypoxia for 24 h. Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP)
with anti-HIF-1α antibody and then the Western blot analysis was
performed using anti-Ubiquitin antibody. (A,C) β-actin protein
amounts are used to check equal loading and transfer of proteins and to
quantify relative HIF-1α protein levels. (A–E) Western
blot, pulse and pulse-chase analyses representative of two independent
experiments with similar results are shown. (A,C,D) Densitometric
analysis (right panel) of the relative Western blot or Pulse-chase
analysis (left panel) was performed using Molecular Analyst Software and
normalized with relative controls.To verify whether bcl-2 enhances HIF-1α protein expression by affecting
its translational rate, we determined the possible involvement of bcl-2 in the
regulation of HIF-1α protein synthesis using
[35S]-labeled methionine and cysteine in pulse
analysis. As shown in
, HIF-1α protein synthesis rate was almost identical in control
cells and bcl-2 overexpressing clones, indicating that bcl-2 does not affect
HIF-1α protein synthesis. Therefore, the potential role of bcl-2 in the
regulation of HIF-1α protein turnover was analyzed. As depicted in
(left and right panels), a time-dependent decrease of HIF-1α
protein level was observed after treatment with the protein synthesis inhibitor
Cyclohexamide (CHX) following hypoxia exposure, both in control cells and bcl-2
transfectants. Particularly under CHX exposure for 60 min, the HIF-1α
protein was still well detectable in bcl-2 transfectants while weakly in the
control cells. Indeed, bcl-2 overexpression increased the HIF-1α
half-life from 15±5 min to 45±5 min under hypoxic
conditions (
). Similar results were obtained evaluating the effect of bcl-2 on
HIF-1α half-life in high cell density conditions, where the
HIF-1α protein half-life was about 20±10 min in control
cells, and increased to 40±5 min in bcl-2 transfectants (). We confirmed these results performing pulse-chase experiment, in which
a pulse with [35S]-labeled methionine and cysteine
was followed by a chase time of varying length (ranging from 15 to 60 min). As
shown in
, HIF-1α degradation rate was higher in control cells compared to
bcl-2 transfectants, in fact after 45 min of chase, the HIF-1α protein
was still well detectable in bcl-2 transfectants, but not in the control cells.
Next, we tested by immunoprecipitation experiments whether the effect of bcl-2
on HIF-1α stabilization is due to an impairment of HIF-1α
ubiquitination. As shown in
, higher levels of ubiquitinated HIF-1α were found in control
cells either treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 under normoxia, either
exposed to hypoxia, when compared to levels of ubiquitinated HIF-1α
found in bcl-2 transfectants exposed to the same conditions. Taken together, all
these data demonstrate that under hypoxia bcl-2 overexpression modulates
HIF-1α expression at a post-translational level through the
stabilization of the HIF-1α protein.
bcl-2 protein interacts with HIF-1α protein
To test whether the effect of bcl-2 on the stability of HIF-1α is due to
their functional cooperation, we tested the eventual interaction between bcl-2
and HIF-1α protein by immunoprecipitation experiments. When
immunoprecipiatation was carried out using an antibody against bcl-2 protein and
Western blot analysis was performed using antibodies that specifically
recognizing HIF-1α protein, bcl-2 was found to be immunoprecipitated
with HIF-1α protein in control cells and bcl-2 overexpressing clones
after exposure to hypoxia, even though the bcl-2/HIF-1α immunocomplex
was more evident in bcl-2 transfectants when compared to control cells (
). To confirm the interaction between endogenous HIF-1α and
bcl-2, the cells were treated with MG132 to accumulate similar levels of
HIF-1α protein in all the cells, then immunoprecipitation experiments
were performed using an anti-HIF-1α antibody and the
bcl-2/HIF-1α immunocomplex were analyzed by Western blot using an
anti-bcl-2 antibody (
). Under these conditions, in spite of similar levels of
immunoprecipitated HIF-1α, bcl-2 protein was well detectable within the
immunoprecipitates in bcl-2 transfectants but only weakly in control cells,
suggesting that HIF-1α interaction with bcl-2 protein was stronger in
bcl-2 overexpressing clones. Similar results were obtained when
immunoprecipitations were performed using different antibodies recognizing
different epitopes on the bcl-2 and HIF-1α proteins (data not shown).
Immunoprecipitation experiments of HIF-1α protein were also perfomed in
two other melanoma cell lines, JR8 and PLF2, and their bcl-2 derivative stably
clones treated with MG132 obtaining similar results (
) and thus generalizing the ability of bcl-2 protein to interact with
HIF-1α protein.
Figure 3
bcl-2 interacts with HIF-1α.
(A) Analysis of HIF-1α/bcl-2 protein interaction in M14 control
(puro) and stably bcl-2 overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones exposed
to hypoxia for 24 h. Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP)
with anti-bcl-2 or control (IgG) antibodies and then the Western blot
analysis was performed using anti-HIF-1α and anti-bcl-2
antibodies. Analysis of HIF-1α/bcl-2 protein interaction in (B)
M14 control (puro) and stably bcl-2 overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37)
clones or (C,D) in PLF2 and JR8 control cells (PLF2/puro, JR8/puro) and
stably bcl-2 overexpressing (PLF2/Bcl-2, JR8/Bcl-2) cells, exposed to
MG132 (10 µM, 6 h). Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with anti-HIF-1α or control (IgG) antibodies and then the
Western blot analysis was performed using anti-HIF-1α and
anti-bcl-2 antibodies. (A–D) β-actin protein amounts
are used to check equal loading and transfer of proteins. Western blot
analyses representative of two independent experiments with similar
results are shown.
bcl-2 interacts with HIF-1α.
(A) Analysis of HIF-1α/bcl-2 protein interaction in M14 control
(puro) and stably bcl-2 overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones exposed
to hypoxia for 24 h. Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP)
with anti-bcl-2 or control (IgG) antibodies and then the Western blot
analysis was performed using anti-HIF-1α and anti-bcl-2
antibodies. Analysis of HIF-1α/bcl-2 protein interaction in (B)
M14 control (puro) and stably bcl-2 overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37)
clones or (C,D) in PLF2 and JR8 control cells (PLF2/puro, JR8/puro) and
stably bcl-2 overexpressing (PLF2/Bcl-2, JR8/Bcl-2) cells, exposed to
MG132 (10 µM, 6 h). Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with anti-HIF-1α or control (IgG) antibodies and then the
Western blot analysis was performed using anti-HIF-1α and
anti-bcl-2 antibodies. (A–D) β-actin protein amounts
are used to check equal loading and transfer of proteins. Western blot
analyses representative of two independent experiments with similar
results are shown.
bcl-2 protein interacts with HIF-1α protein in the
nucleoplasm
bcl-2 is primarily localized in the outer mitochondrial membrane with minor
expression in the nucleus and in the endoplasmatic reticulum [20]. Recent reports indicate that bcl-2 also resides
in the nuclear membrane and may even function within the nucleus [21]–[24]. On the other
hand, HIF-1α protein induced by hypoxic conditions mainly localizes and
elicits its transcriptional activity in the nucleus [1]. Given that bcl-2
is able to interact with HIF-1α, we examined the effect of hypoxia on
the intracellular localization of HIF-1α and bcl-2 by using biochemical
fractionation and confocal microscopy. As reported in
, hypoxic conditions induced HIF-1α protein translocation in the
nuclear fraction of both control cells and bcl-2 transfectants, even though
HIF-1α protein expression was higher in bcl-2 transfectants. By
contrast, overexpressed bcl-2 protein was expressed in nuclear and mainly in
cytoplasmic compartments, and hypoxia did not modulate both bcl-2 expression or
its cellular localization. Confocal microscopy (
) confirmed that bcl-2 protein is mainly cytoplasmic but it is also
localized in the nuclear envelope, and hypoxia does not modify bcl-2
localization. As expected, HIF-1α is mainly localized into the nucleus,
it was found to be organized in spots which co-localized with chromatin,
correlated to an enhanced transcriptional activity of HIF-1α under
hypoxia. Given that hypoxia-induced HIF-1α is mainly localized in the
nuclear compartment, we formulated the hypothesis that bcl-2 may regulate
HIF-1α protein stability through the formation of a protein complex
localized in the nucleus. Immunoprecipitation experiments on isolated nuclear
protein extracts showed that bcl-2 was associated with HIF-1α, while
undetectable levels of HIF-1α/bcl-2 complexes were observed in the
cytosolic fraction, indicating that under hypoxia HIF-1α/bcl-2
interaction may only occur in the nucleus (
). Thus, the finding of an interaction between HIF-1α/bcl-2
proteins in the nucleus suggests that bcl-2 may act on the stabilization of
HIF-1α in this cellular compartment.
Figure 4
bcl-2 interacts with HIF-1α in the nucleus.
(A) Western blot analysis of bcl-2 and HIF-1α protein expression
in nuclear (Nucl) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) protein extracts of M14 control
(puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5) clones exposed to
hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h. LaminA/C (Lam A/C) and
β-tubulin were used as markers for nuclear and cytoplasmic
fraction, respectively. β-actin protein amounts are used to
check equal loading and transfer of proteins. (B) Confocal laser
scanning microscopy of immunofluorescence staining performed on Bcl2/5
stably overexpressing clone exposed to hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h.
Fixed cells were labelled with anti-bcl-2 (green) or
anti-HIF-1α (red) antibodies. Nuclei were
visualized using TO-PRO3® staining (blue). (C)
Analysis of HIF-1α/bcl-2 interaction in Bcl2/5 stably
overexpressing clone exposed to hypoxia for 24 h. Nuclear (Nucl) and
cytoplasmic (Cyto) protein extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-HIF-1α or anti-bcl-2, respectively, or control antibody
(IgG) and then the Western blot analysis was performed using anti-bcl-2
or anti-HIF-1α antibodies. (A–C) Western blot and
confocal analyses representative of two independent experiments with
similar results are shown.
bcl-2 interacts with HIF-1α in the nucleus.
(A) Western blot analysis of bcl-2 and HIF-1α protein expression
in nuclear (Nucl) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) protein extracts of M14 control
(puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5) clones exposed to
hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h. LaminA/C (Lam A/C) and
β-tubulin were used as markers for nuclear and cytoplasmic
fraction, respectively. β-actin protein amounts are used to
check equal loading and transfer of proteins. (B) Confocal laser
scanning microscopy of immunofluorescence staining performed on Bcl2/5
stably overexpressing clone exposed to hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h.
Fixed cells were labelled with anti-bcl-2 (green) or
anti-HIF-1α (red) antibodies. Nuclei were
visualized using TO-PRO3® staining (blue). (C)
Analysis of HIF-1α/bcl-2 interaction in Bcl2/5 stably
overexpressing clone exposed to hypoxia for 24 h. Nuclear (Nucl) and
cytoplasmic (Cyto) protein extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-HIF-1α or anti-bcl-2, respectively, or control antibody
(IgG) and then the Western blot analysis was performed using anti-bcl-2
or anti-HIF-1α antibodies. (A–C) Western blot and
confocal analyses representative of two independent experiments with
similar results are shown.
bcl-2 regulates HIF-1α protein stability in a prolyl
hydroxylation-independent manner
Under normoxia, the proline to alanine mutation of residues 402 and 564 of human
HIF-1α makes the protein resistant to PHD-dependent hydroxylation and
subsequent VHL-dependent ubiquitination and degradation [25]. Besides, PHD2 can be
active in the degradation of HIF-1α even under hypoxic conditions [26],
[27]. In order to study the impact of bcl-2 on
PHD-mediated degradation of HIF-1α protein, we generated M14 cell line
stably expressing wild type form of HIF-1α
(HIF-1α wt) or hydroxylation-resistant (P402A/P564A)
form of HIF-1α (HIF-1α PP/AA). These cells were
then transiently transfected with an empty vector or with a vector encoding
bcl-2 protein and HIF-1α expression and transcriptional activity were
analyzed under hypoxic conditions. As depicted in
, bcl-2 overexpression significantly increased the levels of both
exogenous wt and hydroxylation-resistant form of HIF-1α
(
) and it also enhanced HRE-dependent transcriptional activity (
). As expected, PHD2 overexpression inhibited the expression of
HIF-1α wt and HRE-dependent transcriptional activity
while it did not abrogate the expression and activation of reporter gene
transcription in cells expressing HIF-1α protein containing the
proline-to-alanine substitutions (
). The discovery that bcl-2 had similar effects on the
wt and mutant form of HIF-1α indicated that bcl-2
regulates HIF-1α expression independently from prolyl hydroxylation of
HIF-1α. These results are also supported by the findings that forced
expression of bcl-2 had no impact on HIF-1α stabilization when cells
were treated with PHD inhibitors Cobalt Chloride and Desferoxamine, two iron
antagonists known to inhibit hydroxylase activity ().
Figure 5
HIF-1α prolyl hydroxylation is not required for bcl-2-induced
increase of HIF-1α expression and HIF-1 activity in
hypoxia.
(A) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α, bcl-2 and PHD2 protein
expression and (B) HRE-dependent transcriptional activity in M14 cells
stably expressing HA-HIF-1α wild-type (HIF1α
wt) or mutated (HIF1α
PP/AA), after transiently transfection with control
vector (empty), bcl-2 or PHD2 expressing vectors, and then exposure to
hypoxia for 24 h. (A) β-actin protein amounts are used to check
equal loading and transfer of proteins. Western blot analyses
representative of two independent experiments with similar results are
shown. (B) Relative luciferase activity of each sample were normalized
to the control vector transfected cells. Results represent the mean
± SD of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate,
* p≤0.01.
HIF-1α prolyl hydroxylation is not required for bcl-2-induced
increase of HIF-1α expression and HIF-1 activity in
hypoxia.
(A) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α, bcl-2 and PHD2 protein
expression and (B) HRE-dependent transcriptional activity in M14 cells
stably expressing HA-HIF-1α wild-type (HIF1α
wt) or mutated (HIF1α
PP/AA), after transiently transfection with control
vector (empty), bcl-2 or PHD2 expressing vectors, and then exposure to
hypoxia for 24 h. (A) β-actin protein amounts are used to check
equal loading and transfer of proteins. Western blot analyses
representative of two independent experiments with similar results are
shown. (B) Relative luciferase activity of each sample were normalized
to the control vector transfected cells. Results represent the mean
± SD of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate,
* p≤0.01.
bcl-2 forms a complex with HSP90 and HIF-1α proteins, enhancing their
interaction and protecting HIF-1α from degradation mediated by
17-AAG
HSP90 is a molecular chaperone required for the stability and function of a
number of proteins implicated in cancer cell growth and angiogenesis, including
HIF-1α [28]. In particular, it binds and stabilizes
HIF-1α, and it represents a critical factor in an
O2/PHD/VHL-independent degradation pathway of HIF-1α protein
[2].
To evaluate a possible contribution of HSP90 to bcl-2-induced stabilization of
HIF-1α, we determined whether the pharmacological inhibition of HSP90
with 17-AAG, an inhibitor that can alter the interaction of HSP90 with its
clients [29], modulates HIF-1α expression (
) and transcriptional activity (
) in control cells and two bcl-2 transfectants cells under hypoxia.
17-AAG reduced hypoxia-induced HIF-1α accumulation in control cells,
while only a very barely down-regulation of HIF-1α protein expression
was evident in bcl-2 overexpressing clones after 17-AAG treatment (
). These results suggested that bcl-2 overexpression might confer a
resistance of HIF-1α protein from the degradation induced by the 17-AAG.
On the functional level, 0.05 µM 17-AAG induced about 30%
versus 10% inhibition of HRE-dependent transcriptional activity in
control cells compared with bcl-2 transfectants. The higher dose of 2
µM completely inhibited HRE-dependent transcriptional activity in
control cells, by contrast bcl-2 transfectants cells were resistant to
HRE-dependent transcriptional activity inhibition induced by the same dose of
17-AAG (
). Most importantly, as shown in
, HSP90 protein is highly expressed in both control and bcl-2
overexpressing cells, and the impact of either bcl-2 status and either hypoxic
conditions on HSP90 protein expression was not relevant. To provide evidence
that the HSP90 is involved in bcl-2-induced stabilization of HIF-1α, we
investigated the effect of bcl-2 on the interaction between HIF-1α and
HSP90 proteins by immunoprecipitation of HIF-1α and Western blot
analysis of HSP90 protein. As depicted in
, bcl-2 overexpression under hypoxia enhanced the ability of
HIF-1α to form a complex with HSP90. To confirm the interaction between
HIF-1α and HSP90 proteins, we performed a reverse immunoprecipitation
experiment from total extract of hypoxic cells. Under these conditions, in spite
of similar levels of immunoprecipitated HSP90, a larger amount of HIF-1α
protein within the immunoprecipitate was found in total extracts of bcl-2
transfectants (
), confirming a stronger interaction between HIF-1α and HSP90
proteins in bcl-2 transfectants. We also studied the interaction between HSP90
and bcl-2 protein under hypoxic conditions and we found that HSP90 was
associated with ectopic bcl-2 protein (
). Similar results were also observed when immunoprecipitation
experiments were carried out in nuclear extracts (data not shown). These
findings suggest that bcl-2 may promote stabilization of HIF-1α by
increasing its ability to interact with the HSP90 chaperone complex. To gain
insight to these results, we investigated whether the bcl-2/HSP90/HIF-1α
binding could be reversed when exposing the cells to 17-AAG. We found that
17-AAG treatment reduced the binding between HSP90 and HIF-1α only in
control cells and weakly in bcl-2 transfectants, confirming that bcl-2
overexpressing cells were more resistant to 17-AAG-induced degradation of
HIF-1α. Moreover, we found that the interaction of bcl-2 protein with
HIF-1α was not affected by 17-AAG treatment (
). Because our results showed that both HSP90 and HIF-1α proteins
bind to bcl-2, we investigated the potential formation of a
HSP90/HIF-1α/bcl-2 tri-complex. To address this hypothesis, the cell
lysates were firstly immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF-1α antibody, then
subjected to a second immunoprecipitation with anti-bcl-2 antibody, and the
immunocomplexes were analyzed by Western blot analysis using antibody against
HSP90 protein. As shown in
, HSP90 could be found in complex with HIF-1α and bcl-2 protein
in cells overexpressing bcl-2, demonstrating the formation of a
HSP90/HIF-1α/bcl-2 tri-complex. Overall these findings suggested that
bcl-2 may promote stabilization of HIF-1α by increasing its ability to
interact with the HSP90 chaperone complex, probably affecting its folding and
maturation.
Figure 6
bcl-2 forms a complex with HSP90 and HIF-1α proteins.
(A) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α protein expression in M14
control cells (puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37)
clones treated with 17-AAG under hypoxia or exposed to normoxia for 24
h. (B) HRE-dependent transcriptional activity in the cells treated with
17-AAG from 0.05 to 2 µM under hypoxia or exposed to normoxia
for 24 h. Relative luciferase activity of each sample was normalized to
untreated cells exposed to normoxic conditions. Results represent the
average ± SD of 3 independent experiments performed in
triplicate. p values were calculated relative to untreated cells exposed
to hypoxic conditions, *p≤0.01. (C) Western blot analysis
of HSP90 protein expression in parental M14 cells, control (puro) and
bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones. (D) Analysis of
HIF-1α/HSP90 interaction in the cells exposed to hypoxia for 24
h. Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-HIF-1α or control (IgG) antibodies and then the Western
blot analysis was performed using anti-HSP90 and anti-HIF-1α
antibodies. (E) Analysis of HSP90/HIF-1α and HSP90/bcl-2
interactions in the cells exposed to hypoxia for 24 h. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HSP90 or control (IgG) antibodies and
then the Western blot analysis was performed using anti-HIF-1α,
anti-bcl-2 and anti-HSP90 antibodies. (F) Analysis of
HIF-1α/HSP90 and HIF-1α/bcl-2 interactions in the cells
treated with 0.5 µM 17-AAG for 24 h under hypoxia. Whole cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HIF-1α antibody
and then the Western blot analysis was performed using specific
anti-HSP90 and bcl-2 antibodies. (G) Analysis of
HSP90/HIF-1α/bcl-2 protein complex in the cells exposed to
hypoxia for 24 h. Whole cell lysates were sequentially
immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF-1α (IP1) and anti-bcl-2
antibodies (IP2) and then the Western blot analysis was performed using
anti-HSP90 antibody. (A,C) β-actin protein amounts are used to
check equal loading and transfer of proteins.
bcl-2 forms a complex with HSP90 and HIF-1α proteins.
(A) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α protein expression in M14
control cells (puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37)
clones treated with 17-AAG under hypoxia or exposed to normoxia for 24
h. (B) HRE-dependent transcriptional activity in the cells treated with
17-AAG from 0.05 to 2 µM under hypoxia or exposed to normoxia
for 24 h. Relative luciferase activity of each sample was normalized to
untreated cells exposed to normoxic conditions. Results represent the
average ± SD of 3 independent experiments performed in
triplicate. p values were calculated relative to untreated cells exposed
to hypoxic conditions, *p≤0.01. (C) Western blot analysis
of HSP90 protein expression in parental M14 cells, control (puro) and
bcl-2 stably overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones. (D) Analysis of
HIF-1α/HSP90 interaction in the cells exposed to hypoxia for 24
h. Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-HIF-1α or control (IgG) antibodies and then the Western
blot analysis was performed using anti-HSP90 and anti-HIF-1α
antibodies. (E) Analysis of HSP90/HIF-1α and HSP90/bcl-2
interactions in the cells exposed to hypoxia for 24 h. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HSP90 or control (IgG) antibodies and
then the Western blot analysis was performed using anti-HIF-1α,
anti-bcl-2 and anti-HSP90 antibodies. (F) Analysis of
HIF-1α/HSP90 and HIF-1α/bcl-2 interactions in the cells
treated with 0.5 µM 17-AAG for 24 h under hypoxia. Whole cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HIF-1α antibody
and then the Western blot analysis was performed using specific
anti-HSP90 and bcl-2 antibodies. (G) Analysis of
HSP90/HIF-1α/bcl-2 protein complex in the cells exposed to
hypoxia for 24 h. Whole cell lysates were sequentially
immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF-1α (IP1) and anti-bcl-2
antibodies (IP2) and then the Western blot analysis was performed using
anti-HSP90 antibody. (A,C) β-actin protein amounts are used to
check equal loading and transfer of proteins.
HSP90β isoform is the mediator of HIF-1α induction by bcl-2
under hypoxic conditions
The molecular chaperones HSP90 comprise two homologous proteins, HSP90α
and HSP90β, that are encoded by distinct genes [28]. Experiments were
performed to evaluate the impact of bcl-2 overexpression on the expression of
these isoforms and their binding to HIF-1α protein. We found that both
the hypoxic conditions and bcl-2 protein level of the cells did not modulate the
expression of HSP90α and HSP90β proteins (
). We then investigated the effect of bcl-2 on the interaction between
HIF-1α and HSP90s proteins by immunoprecipitation of HIF-1α
protein. As depicted in
, Western blot analysis, using antibodies specifically recognizing the
isoform α or β, showed that HSP90β, but not
HSP90α, forms a complex with HIF-1α protein in bcl-2
overexpressing cells exposed to hypoxia. To further validate the involvement of
HSP90 proteins and to confirm the possibility that HSP90β, rather than
α isoform, is involved in HIF-1α stabilization mediated by bcl-2
in hypoxia, HIF-1α protein expression was evaluated in bcl-2
overexpressing cells after transfection with shRNA targeting the α
(shHSP90α) or the β (shHSP90β) isoforms. As control,
cells were transfected with scramble shRNA vector (shNC).
Figure 7
HSP90β is the mediator of HIF-1α induction by bcl-2
under hypoxic conditions.
(A) Western blot analysis of HSP90α and HSP90β protein
expression in M14 control (puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing
(Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones exposed to hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h. (B)
Analysis of HSP90α/HIF-1α and
HSP90β/HIF-1α interactions in the cells exposed to
hypoxia for 24 h. Protein extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-HIF-1α and then Western blot analysis was performed using
anti-HSP90α and anti-HSP90β antibodies. (C,D) Western
blot analysis of HIF-1α, HSP90α and HSP90β
protein expression in bcl-2 stably overexpressing cells transiently
transfected with short hairpin construct targeting HSP90β
(shHSP90β), HSP90α (shHSP90α) or with control
vector (shNC) and exposed to hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h. (A,C,D)
β-actin protein amounts are used to check equal loading and
transfer of proteins. (A–D) Western blot analyses
representative of two independent experiments with similar results are
shown.
HSP90β is the mediator of HIF-1α induction by bcl-2
under hypoxic conditions.
(A) Western blot analysis of HSP90α and HSP90β protein
expression in M14 control (puro) and bcl-2 stably overexpressing
(Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) clones exposed to hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h. (B)
Analysis of HSP90α/HIF-1α and
HSP90β/HIF-1α interactions in the cells exposed to
hypoxia for 24 h. Protein extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-HIF-1α and then Western blot analysis was performed using
anti-HSP90α and anti-HSP90β antibodies. (C,D) Western
blot analysis of HIF-1α, HSP90α and HSP90β
protein expression in bcl-2 stably overexpressing cells transiently
transfected with short hairpin construct targeting HSP90β
(shHSP90β), HSP90α (shHSP90α) or with control
vector (shNC) and exposed to hypoxia or to normoxia for 24 h. (A,C,D)
β-actin protein amounts are used to check equal loading and
transfer of proteins. (A–D) Western blot analyses
representative of two independent experiments with similar results are
shown.Western blot analysis confirmed the effective knockdown of the expression of each
HSP90 target (
). Moreover, the specificity of each shRNA against HSP90 was demonstrated
by the absence of expression modulation of the other HSP90 isoform, verifying
that both shRNAs were highly specific for their respective targets.
Interestingly, Western blot analysis showed that shHSP90β (
), but not shHSP90α (
), completely inhibited hypoxic induction of HIF-1α protein in
bcl-2 overexpressing cells.
Discussion
The bcl-2 protein is an inhibitor of apoptosis that has been recognized to play an
important role also in a wide range of other biological processes, among which
autophagy, DNA repair and drug resistance [21], [30]–[32].
Recent studies, including ours, have demonstrated that bcl-2 also promotes tumour
progression and angiogenesis of different tumour histotypes [13], [16],
[33],
[34]. In
this context, we have previously demonstrated that under hypoxic conditions the
overexpression of bcl-2 in tumour cells is able to increase tumor angiogenesis
enhancing the secretion of the pro-angiogenic factor VEGF, through the induction of
HIF-1α protein expression and HIF-1 transcriptional activity [12],
[13].In the present study, we investigated the mechanism by which bcl-2 regulates
HIF-1α protein expression in M14 melanoma cells under conditions strictly
dependent on oxygen availability, such as hypoxia and high cell density. We
demonstrated that HIF-1α protein is required for bcl-2-induced VEGF
expression under hypoxia by using a small interference approach. Moreover, we
confirmed the capability of bcl-2 to modulate VEGF expression in several melanoma
cells. We showed that also in high cell density conditions, which create a local
pericellular hypoxic microenvironment, bcl-2 overexpression determines an increase
of HIF-1α protein expression and HIF-1 transcriptional activity, similar to
the ones obtained in hypoxia. Alternatively, bcl-2 is not able to cooperate with
insulin or EGF to induce HIF-1α protein expression under normoxia,
highlighting that the capacity of bcl-2 to regulate HIF-1α protein
expression strictly depends on oxygen availability.We further identified HIF-1α protein stabilization as a key mechanism for
HIF-1 induction by bcl-2 under hypoxia. Our data demonstrated that bcl-2 under this
condition affects HIF-1α protein at the post-translational level, indeed the
degradation rate of HIF-1α protein was faster in the control cells than in
bcl-2 transfectants. Although under normoxia this HIF-1α stabilization is
not sufficient to affect the steady state levels of the protein, it becomes rate
limiting during hypoxia or, in general, in conditions strictly dependent on oxygen
level. In fact, we found that bcl-2 overexpression determines an increase of
HIF-1α protein half-life also in high cell density conditions, as observed
under hypoxia. The stabilization of HIF-1α protein in response to changes in
oxygen concentration is achieved through the impairment of HIF-1α
ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of the protein. Generally, HIF-1α
is degraded in an oxygen-dependent manner through the activity of PHD2 enzyme, which
hydroxylates HIF-1α on proline residues 402 and 564, and this hydroxylated
form is bound by the E3 ubiquitin ligase VHL which promotes HIF-1α
ubiquitination and its subsequent proteasomal degradation [19]. Notwithstanding,
we found that bcl-2 regulates HIF-1α protein stability in a prolyl
hydroxylation-independent manner since bcl-2 overexpression had similar effects on
either wild type protein and the degradation resistant form of
HIF-1α, which contains proline-to-alanine substitutions (P402A/P564A)
triggering a resistance to PHD2-mediated hydroxylation. In agreement with this
finding, in our experimental model PHD2 protein expression was upregulated in
response to hypoxia at comparable levels in parental cells and bcl-2 overexpressing
clones (data not shown). Further, bcl-2 overexpression had no impact on
HIF-1α protein stabilization induced by iron antagonists known to inhibit
hydroxylase activity, such as Cobalt Chloride and Desferoxamine.Some authors have reported that bcl-2 may reside, and even elicit a function, within
the nucleus [21]–[23], modulating the
transactivity of several transcription factors [35], [36]. Here, we present
evidence that in our experimental model the exogenous bcl-2 protein is also
localized in the nucleus, beyond the cytoplasm. Of note, our results reveal, for the
first time, that bcl-2 protein interacts with HIF-1α in the nucleus, thus
the pro-angiogenic effect of bcl-2 on HIF-1/VEGF axis may result from the nuclear
localization of bcl-2. Since the HIF-1α/bcl-2 complex can be observed in the
nucleus, we can speculate that bcl-2-mediated stabilization of HIF-1α
protein occurs in this cellular compartment. By dissecting the molecular mechanism
of this process, we found that bcl-2 increases HIF-1α protein stability
through the involvement of the molecular chaperone HSP90, which was found to protect
HIF-1α from proteasomal degradation, even in VHL-deficient cells [37], [38].
In this context, our data further indicate that the enhanced levels of
HIF-1α protein in bcl-2 overexpressing clones may be due to a decreased
poly-ubiquitination of HIF-1α by enforcing the interaction between
HIF-1α and HSP90 protein. Moreover, we have shown not only a novel
association of HIF-1α with bcl-2, but we have also observed that bcl-2 is
able to interact with HSP90 itself. Most importantly, we found that the interaction
between bcl-2 and HIF-1α proteins was not dependent on HSP90 inhibition,
because the binding of bcl-2 and HIF-1α was not reversed by the treatment
with 17-AAG. In addition, sequential immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated
that bcl-2, HIF-1α and HSP90 proteins may form a tri-complex which probably
contributes to enhance HIF-1α protein stability in bcl-2 overexpressing
clones under hypoxia. Here, we investigated the role of HSP90α and
HSP90β isoforms in bcl-2-mediated HIF-1α induction under hypoxic
condition. These two homologous proteins display some differences and elicit
specific functions, such as differential binding to client proteins [28].
Using genetic approaches to specifically knockdown each HSP90 isoform in bcl-2
overexpressing cells, we found that HSP90β, but not HSP90α, is
required for HIF-1α protein stabilization by bcl-2. Moreover, in agreement
with these data, we found that only HSP90β binds HIF-1α protein in
bcl-2 overexpressing cells exposed to hypoxia. These results are in a good
accordance with very recent data demonstrating an association between β
isoform of HSP90 and bcl-2 protein in response to VEGF in leukemia cells [39] or to CpG
oligodeoxynucleotide in macrophages [40]. All together, these results confirm that
HSP90β is an important regulator of HIF-1α stability and indicate
that this molecular chaperone may be one of the mediators of bcl-2 pro-angiogenic
function. A recent report demonstrated that RACK1 protein promotes ubiquitination of
HIF-1α induced by the HSP90 inhibitor 17-AAG and its subsequent
VHL-independent proteasomal degradation competing with HSP90 for binding to PAS
domain of HIF-1α [2]. Notwithstanding, when exposing melanoma cells to
the HSP90 inhibitor 17-AAG, we observed that bcl-2 overexpression counteracts both
HIF-1α protein degradation induced by 17-AAG, and the reduction of
interaction between HIF-1α and HSP90 induced by the inhibitor. Besides, we
did not observe any difference in the HIF-1α binding to RACK1 after forced
expression of bcl-2 under hypoxia even after 17-AAG exposure (data not shown),
suggesting that bcl-2 does not regulates RACK1/Elongin-C dependent HIF-1α
degradation pathways. So far we cannot exclude that other molecular players, such as
HSP70, JNK1 and the COMMD1 proteins [41]–[43], may be
modulated by bcl-2 and play a role in the stabilization process of HIF-1α
protein mediated by bcl-2.In conclusion, our study establishes a molecular link and highlights the possibility
that bcl-2 is a new HIF-1α-binding protein whose multivalent interactions
are required for the stabilization of HIF-1α, and that nuclear localization
of bcl-2 may have an important role in protecting HIF-1α from ubiquitination
and proteasomal degradation that commences in the nucleus.
Materials and Methods
Cell cultures, hypoxia exposure, transfections and viral infection
Human melanoma cell lines were cultured in complete RPMI medium (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA). JR1, JR8, M14, PLF2 [44], and ASM-SC,
bcl-2 overexpressing clones (Bcl2/5 and Bcl2/37) and a control clone (puro)
derived from the M14 line after stable transfection, bcl-2 overexpressing
(JR8/Bcl-2 and PLF2/Bcl-2) and control (JR8/puro, PLF2/puro) cells derived from
the JR8 and PLF2 line after stable transfection were used. ASM-SC was cloned by
limiting dilution from A375.S2 melanoma cell line (ATCC, Manassas, VA). For
hypoxia exposure, culture dishes were placed in a hypoxia chamber allowing the
formation of a hypoxic environment of 5% CO2,
95% N2. Unless stated otherwise, these hypoxic levels
(1% of oxygen concentration, 24 h) was used in all experiments. For
experiments under low or high cell density conditions, 100 cells/mm2
or 700 cells/mm2 were respectively plated and 24 h later cells were
harvested and subjected to different assays.The cells were stably or transiently transfected with the expression vector
encoding the human wild type bcl-2. Transfections of expression
vectors or RNA interference were performed as previously reported [44],
using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). SureSilencing shRNA plasmids against
HSP90α and β isoforms containing the hygromycin resistance gene
were obtained from SABiosciences (Frederick, MD). Polyclonal population of
stably transfected cells were used. Viruses were generated as previously
described [45]. In short, the Phoenix amphotropic packaging
line was transfected with the pBabe-based retroviral expression vectors carrying
wild type (Addgene plasmid 19365) or
hydroxylation-resistant (P402A/P564A) form (Addgene plasmid 19005) of HA-tagged
HIF-1α. Transfected cells were incubated for 48 h at 37°C for
virus production. The virus-containing medium was collected, filtered and used
to infect the target cells. Stable clones or mixed populations were cultured in
the presence of puromycin (1 µg/ml).
Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were prepared as follows:
1–2×106 cells were resuspended in a hypotonic
lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA)
containing protease inhibitors (Boehringer). After resuspension, NP-40 was added
to a final concentration of 0.6% and the nuclei were isolated by
centrifugation at 10,000 r.p.m. for 30 s at 4°C. After removing the
supernatant (i.e. the cytoplasmic extract), the nuclei were re-suspended in a
nuclear extract buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 0.4 M NaCl,
0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA), rocked for 15 min at 4°C and then recovered
by centrifugation at 140,00 r.p.m. for 5 min at 4°C.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis
For immunoprecipitation assays and Western blot analysis, the cells were lysed in
0.3% CHAPS buffer (40 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 120 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM pyrophosphate, 10 mM glycerophosphate, 50 mM NaF, 1.5 mM
Na3VO4, 0.3% CHAPS, and one tablet
EDTA-free protease inhibitors [Roche] per 10 ml). Followed by
centrifugation, the supernatant was precleared with protein A/G agarose beads
coupled with mouse or rabbit IgG (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford,
IL) for >2 h and then was exposed to 1 µg of the antibody
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or mouse or rabbit IgG, as control,
was added to each of the cellular lysates and incubated overnight at 4°C
followed by incubation with protein A/G-agarose beads (Amersham Biosciences
Europe, Milan, Italy) for 2 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were washed
four times in the lysis buffer before Western blotting analysis. For some
immunoprecipitation experiments we used ExactaCruz™ reagents (Santa
Cruz Biotecnology) to detect the bcl-2 protein without detection of the light
chain of the immunoprecipitation antibody. Immunoprecipitation were also
performed using multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes on the bcl-2
(Santa Cruz Biotecnology) and HIF-1α (Santa Cruz Biotecnology; Novus
Biologicals, Littleton, CO) protein. Sequential immunoprecipitation experiments
were performed incubating 2 mg of total cell lysate with antibody as for single
immunoprecipitation, after washing the precipitated proteins were released with
1% SDS at 37°C for 30 minutes. Then, the eluate was diluted
to a final concentration of 0.1% SDS with lysis buffer and
immunoprecipitation was repeated with the supernatant with fresh beads and
antibody.For Western blot analysis, antibodies directed to HIF-1α, HIF-1β,
HSP90 (BD Pharmingen), HA epitope, ubiquitin (Santa Cruz Biotecnology), bcl-2
(Dako, Milan, Italy), β-tubulin (Thermo Scientific), HSP90α,
HSP90β (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), PHD2 (Novus Biologicals), Lamin A/C (Cell
Signaling, Danvers, MA), β-actin (Sigma) were used.
Pulse and pulse-chase assays
In the pulse assay, cells were incubated with methionine/cysteine–free
serum-free DMEM (Invitrogen) for 2 h. [35S]-labeled
methionine-cysteine (88 µCi/ml, EasyTag™
EXPRESS35S Protein Labeling Mix, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) was
added to the medium and cells were collected after 15 and 45 min. In the
pulse-chase assay, after 45 min pulse with
[35S]-labeled methionine-cysteine, cells were
washed three times with PBS, chased with DMEM containing 10% FBS and
2.5 mg/mL cold L-methionine and harvested after 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. Total
protein lysates from pulse and pulse-chase assays were immunoprecipitated by
HIF-1α antibody. Radiolabeled HIF-1α protein and the input cell
lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Gels were dried, exposed in phosphorImager
cassette for 1–3 days and imaged using Personal Molecular Imager FX
and Quantity One® software (Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
ELISA
The supernatants were harvested and assayed for VEGF content by ELISA kit
according to the manufacturer's instructions (R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN). VEGF levels were normalized to the number of adherent
cells.
Reporter gene assay
The cells were seeded in 24-well plates and were transfected with a total of 1
µg of DNA/well using Lipofectamine reagent. The evaluation of HIF-1
transcriptional activity was performed as previously described [12]
transfecting cells with a vector expressing luciferase under the control of 4X
Hypoxia Responsive Element (HRE) and another one expressing
β-galactosidase under the control of CMV promoter. The relative
luciferase activity was calculated by luciferase/β- galactosidase ratios
for each sample.
Confocal analysis
After 24 h hypoxic conditions exposure, cells were fixed in 100%
methyl alcohol for 10 min at −20°C and then incubated with
primary antibodies. The cells were incubated with TRITC conjugated Goat
anti-Rabbit and/or FITC conjugated Goat anti-Mouse (Jackson Lab, West Grove,
PA). Nuclei were visualized using TO-PRO3® (Invitrogen). The images were
scanned under a ×40 oil immersion objective and to avoid bleed-through
effects, each dye was scanned independently by a Leica confocal microscope
(laser-scanning TCS SP2) equipped with Ar/ArKr and HeNe lasers. The images were
acquired and electronically merged utilizing the Leica confocal software (Leica
Microsystems Heidelberg GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Figures were processed using
Adobe PhotoShop software.
Densitometric analysis
Developed films were acquired using GS-700 Imaging Densitometer (Biorad) and
processed with Corel Photo Paint 7.0 to adjust image brightness and contrast.
Densitometric evaluation was performed using Molecular Analyst Software (Biorad)
and normalized with relative controls depending on the analysis performed.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between groups were analyzed with a two-sided paired or unpaired
Student's t test by use of GraphPad Prism 3.00
(GraphPadSoftware, San Diego, CA). Results were considered to be statistically
significant if p<0.05. Experiments were usually repeated three times
unless indicated otherwise.HIF-1α protein is required for VEGF induction by bcl-2 in melanoma
cells under hypoxia. (A) Western blot analysis of bcl-2 protein expression
in whole extracts and (B) ELISA assay of VEGF protein in conditioned medium
in several human melanoma cell lines exposed to normoxia and hypoxia for 24
h, after transient transfection with control (empty) or bcl-2 expressing
vector (Bcl-2). (C) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α and
HIF-1β protein expression in total extracts and (D) ELISA assay of
VEGF protein in conditioned medium in M14 cells stably transfected with
control (puro) or bcl-2 expression vector (Bcl2/5) after transfection with
siRNA directed against HIF-1α (siHIF-1α) or unrelated
control mRNA (siNC) and then exposed to normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. (A,C)
β-actin protein amounts are used to check equal loading and transfer
of proteins. Western blot analyses representative of two independent
experiments with similar results are shown. (B,D) Results represent the mean
± SD of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate. Fold
induction of secreted VEGF protein relative to normoxia. *
p<0.01(0.98 MB TIF)Click here for additional data file.Bcl-2 cooperates with high cell density conditions to induce nuclear
HIF-1α protein and HIF-1 transactivation activity. (A) Western blot
analysis of HIF-1α and HIF-1β protein expression in
cytoplasmic (Cyto) and nuclear (Nucl) protein extracts of M14 control (puro)
and bcl-2 overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) cells plated under low (sparse)
or high (dense) cell density condition. β-actin protein amounts are
used to check equal loading and transfer of proteins. Western blot analysis
representative of two independent experiments with similar results are
shown. (B) HRE transcriptional activity of the cells cultured under sparse
or dense conditions. Results represent the mean ±SD of 3
independent experiments performed in triplicate. Fold induction relative to
sparse condition. * p<0.01(0.88 MB TIF)Click here for additional data file.Bcl-2 promotes HIF-1α protein stability in high cell density
conditions. Western blot analysis (panel left) and quantification (panel
right) of HIF-1α protein expression in total lysates of melanoma
control (puro) and bcl-2 overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) cells cultured
under high cell density conditions (dense) and then treated with
Cyclohexamide (CHX, 50 µg/ml) for the indicated times.
β-actin protein amounts are used to check equal loading and transfer
of proteins. Western blot analysis representative of two independent
experiments with similar results are shown. Densitometric analysis (panel
right) of the relative Western blot (panel left) was performed using
Molecular Analyst Software and normalized with relative controls depending
on the analysis performed.(0.89 MB TIF)Click here for additional data file.Bcl-2 does not cooperate with hypoxic mimetic compounds to induce
HIF-1α protein expression. Western blot analysis of HIF-1α
protein expression in total lysates of M14 control (puro) and bcl-2
overexpressing (Bcl2/5, Bcl2/37) cells exposed to desferrioxamine (DFO, 50
µM) or Cobalt Cloride (CoCl2, 100 µM) for 3 h.
β-actin protein amounts are used to check equal loading and transfer
of proteins. Western blot analyses representative of two independent
experiments with similar results are shown.(0.39 MB TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Jin Hyen Baek; Patrick C Mahon; Jane Oh; Brian Kelly; Balaji Krishnamachary; Mia Pearson; Denise A Chan; Amato J Giaccia; Gregg L Semenza Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Bart van de Sluis; Arjan J Groot; Jeroen Vermeulen; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Cisca Wijmenga; Leo W Klomp; Marc Vooijs Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John W Bullen; Irina Tchernyshyov; Ronald J Holewinski; Lauren DeVine; Fan Wu; Vidya Venkatraman; David L Kass; Robert N Cole; Jennifer Van Eyk; Gregg L Semenza Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: D Trisciuoglio; C Gabellini; M Desideri; Y Ragazzoni; T De Luca; E Ziparo; D Del Bufalo Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 15.828