Literature DB >> 20667219

Practical protective tools for occupational exposure: 1) double focus spectacles for the aged with highly refracted glass lens 2) remodeled barrier for radiation protection.

S Kurokawa1, S Yabe, A Takamura, H Ishizaki, S Aizawa.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Two practical protective tools for occupational exposure for neurointerventional radiologists are presented. The first purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of double focus spectacles for the aged with a highly refracted glass lens (special spectacles for the aged) for radiation protection of the crystalline lens of the eye in comparison with other spectacles on the market, based on the measurement of film density which was obtained by exposure of X-ray through those spectacles. As a result of the film densitometry mentioned above, the effectiveness of special spectacles for the aged in radiation protection was nearly equal to the effectiveness of a goggle type shield which is made with a 0.07 mm lead-equivalent plastic lens. The second purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the protective barrier, which we remodeled for cerebral angiography or neuroendovascular therapy, for radiation exposure, based on the measurement in a simulated study with a head phantom, and on the measurement of radiation exposure in operaters during procedures of clinical cases. In the experimental study radiation exposure in supposed position of the crystalline lens was reduced to about one third and radiation exposure in supposed position of the gonadal glands was reduced to about one seventh, compared to radiation exposure without employing the barrier. The radiation exposure was monitored at the left breast of three radiologists, in 215 cases of cerebral angiography. Employing the barrier in cerebral angiography, average equivalent dose at the left breast measured 1.49mu Sv during 10 min of fluoroscopy. In three kinds of neuroendovascular therapy in 40 cases, radiation exposure in an operator was monitored in the same fashion and the dose was recorded less than the result reported in previous papers in which any protective barrier have not been employed in the procedure (1,2). As a result, the two above mentioned protective tools are considered practical in clinical usage and very effective to reduce radiation exposure in an operator of interventional neuroradiolgy which may sometimes require many hours to complete the therapy under extended fluoroscopic time. 1) The first topic of this report is double focus spectacles for the aged with a highly refracted glass lens (special spectacles for the aged).

Year:  2001        PMID: 20667219      PMCID: PMC3685933          DOI: 10.1177/15910199000060S103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  7 in total

1.  [Radiation exposure of the ocular lens and thyroid gland in digital subtraction angiography of brain-supplying arteries].

Authors:  J P Heyne; C Schleicher; J Söldner; R Neumann; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1997-11

2.  Radiation dose to patients and personnel during intraoperative digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  C P Derdeyn; C J Moran; J O Eichling; D T Cross
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure.

Authors:  W Huda; K R Peters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  [Effective dose evaluation of angiography staff].

Authors:  K Nishizawa; T Maruyama; M Takayama; S Dono; Y Furuya
Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1994-06-25

5.  Patient and staff dosimetry in neuroradiological procedures.

Authors:  N W Marshall; J Noble; K Faulkner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Radiation doses to patients and personnel involved in embolization of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  B Berthelsen; A Cederblad
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Radiation exposure in endovascular surgery of the head and neck.

Authors:  N Kuwayama; A Takaku; S Endo; M Nishijima; T Kamei
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.825

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Fluoroscopic Cranial Radiation Exposure in Spine Surgery: A Prospective Single-Center Evaluation in Operating Room Personnel.

Authors:  Laila Malani Mohammad; James Messegee; M Omar Chohan; Christopher L Taylor
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.