Literature DB >> 20665903

Evaluation of the radiation dose in micro-CT with optimization of the scan protocol.

Inneke Willekens1, Nico Buls, Tony Lahoutte, Luc Baeyens, Christian Vanhove, Vicky Caveliers, Rudi Deklerck, Axel Bossuyt, Johan de Mey.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Micro-CT provides non-invasive anatomic evaluation of small animals. Serial micro-CT measurements are, however, hampered by the severity of ionizing radiation doses cumulating over the total period of follow-up. The dose levels may be sufficient to influence experimental outcomes such as animal survival or tumor growth. AIM: This study was designed to evaluate the radiation dose of micro-CT and to optimize the scanning protocol for longitudinal micro-CT scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Normal C57Bl/6 mice were euthanized. Radiation exposure was measured using individually calibrated lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Thirteen TLDs were placed in the mice at the thyroid, lungs, liver, stomach, colon, bladder and near the spleen. Micro-CT (SkyScan 1178) was performed using two digital X-ray cameras which scanned over 180 degrees at a resolution of 83 microm, a rotation step of 1.08 degrees , 50 kV, 615 microA and 121 s image acquisition time. The TLDs were removed after each scan. CTDI(100) was measured with a 100 mm ionization chamber, centrally positioned in a 2.7 cm diameter water phantom, and rotation steps were increased to reduce both scan time and radiation dose.
RESULTS: Internal TLD analysis demonstrated median organ dose of 5.5 +/- 0.6 mGy per mA s, confirmed by CTDI(100) with result of 6.6 mGy per mA s. A rotation step of 2.16 resulted in qualitatively accurate images. At a resolution of 83 microm the scan time is reduced to 63 s with an estimated dose of 2.9 mGy per mA s. At 166 microm resolution, the scan time is limited to 27 s, with a concordant dose of 1.2 mGy per mA s.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose of a standard micro-CT scan is relatively high and could influence the experimental outcome. We believe that the presented adaptation of the scan protocol allows for accurate imaging without the risk of interfering with the experimental outcome of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665903     DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1555-4309            Impact factor:   3.161


  25 in total

1.  The effect of different image reconstruction techniques on pre-clinical quantitative imaging and dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Ana Vaniqui; Lotte E J R Schyns; Isabel P Almeida; Brent van der Heyden; Mark Podesta; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Julia G Mannheim; Firat Kara; Janine Doorduin; Kerstin Fuchs; Gerald Reischl; Sayuan Liang; Marleen Verhoye; Felix Gremse; Laura Mezzanotte; Marc C Huisman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Multifunctional in vivo vascular imaging using near-infrared II fluorescence.

Authors:  Guosong Hong; Jerry C Lee; Joshua T Robinson; Uwe Raaz; Liming Xie; Ngan F Huang; John P Cooke; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Longitudinal in vivo microcomputed tomography of mouse lungs: No evidence for radiotoxicity.

Authors:  Greetje Vande Velde; Ellen De Langhe; Jennifer Poelmans; Peter Bruyndonckx; Emiliano d'Agostino; Erik Verbeken; Ria Bogaerts; Rik Lories; Uwe Himmelreich
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 5.  Methodology, selection, and integration of fracture healing assessments in mice.

Authors:  Adam M Knox; Anthony C McGuire; Roman M Natoli; Melissa A Kacena; Christopher D Collier
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  PET of HER2-positive pulmonary metastases with 18F-ZHER2:342 affibody in a murine model of breast cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG.

Authors:  Gabriela Kramer-Marek; Marcelino Bernardo; Dale O Kiesewetter; Ulas Bagci; Monika Kuban; Omer Aras; Aras Omer; Rafal Zielinski; Jurgen Seidel; Peter Choyke; Jacek Capala
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Noninvasive allergic sinus congestion and resolution assessments using microcomputed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Julia Litvinov; Walter C Spear; Igor Patrikeev; Massoud Motamedi; Bill T Ameredes
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-08-30

8.  4D multimodality imaging of Citrobacter rodentium infections in mice.

Authors:  James William Collins; Jeffrey A Meganck; Chaincy Kuo; Kevin P Francis; Gad Frankel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Evaluation of different grafting materials for alveolar cleft repair in the context of orthodontic tooth movement in rats.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Kristian Kniha; Zuzanna Magnuska; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh; Felix Gremse; Frank Hölzle; Gholamreza Danesh; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  In vivo X-ray computed tomographic imaging of soft tissue with native, intravenous, or oral contrast.

Authors:  Connor A Wathen; Nathan Foje; Tony van Avermaete; Bernadette Miramontes; Sarah E Chapaman; Todd A Sasser; Raghuraman Kannan; Steven Gerstler; W Matthew Leevy
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.