Literature DB >> 20665689

RosettaHoles2: a volumetric packing measure for protein structure refinement and validation.

William Sheffler1, David Baker.   

Abstract

We present an improved version of RosettaHoles, a methodology for quantitative and visual characterization of protein core packing. RosettaHoles2 features a packing measure more rapidly computable, accurate and physically transparent, as well as a new validation score intended for structures submitted to the Protein Data Bank. The differential packing measure is parameterized to maximize the gap between computationally generated and experimentally determined X-ray structures, and can be used in refinement of protein structure models. The parameters of the model provide insight into components missing in current force fields, and the validation score gives an upper bound on the X-ray resolution of Protein Data Bank structures; a crystal structure should have a validation score as good as or better than its resolution.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665689      PMCID: PMC2998733          DOI: 10.1002/pro.458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  10 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

3.  Helical shifts generate two distinct conformers in the atomic resolution structure of the CheA phosphotransferase domain from Thermotoga maritima.

Authors:  Cindy M Quezada; Cristian Gradinaru; Melvin I Simon; Alexandrine M Bilwes; Brian R Crane
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Sorting the chaff from the wheat at the PDB.

Authors:  Dale E Tronrud; Brian W Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  RosettaHoles: rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation.

Authors:  Will Sheffler; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Errors in protein structures.

Authors:  R W Hooft; G Vriend; C Sander; E E Abola
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Staphylococcal nuclease: proposed mechanism of action based on structure of enzyme-thymidine 3',5'-bisphosphate-calcium ion complex at 1.5-A resolution.

Authors:  F A Cotton; E E Hazen; M J Legg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High-resolution structures of retinol-binding protein in complex with retinol: pH-induced protein structural changes in the crystal state.

Authors:  Vito Calderone; Rodolfo Berni; Giuseppe Zanotti
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids.

Authors:  Ian W Davis; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Vincent B Chen; Jeremy N Block; Gary J Kapral; Xueyi Wang; Laura W Murray; W Bryan Arendall; Jack Snoeyink; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total
  22 in total

1.  Automated selection of stabilizing mutations in designed and natural proteins.

Authors:  Benjamin Borgo; James J Havranek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Resolution-by-proxy: a simple measure for assessing and comparing the overall quality of NMR protein structures.

Authors:  Mark Berjanskii; Jianjun Zhou; Yongjie Liang; Guohui Lin; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Models of protein-ligand crystal structures: trust, but verify.

Authors:  Marc C Deller; Bernhard Rupp
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  BetaCavityWeb: a webserver for molecular voids and channels.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Kim; Youngsong Cho; Mokwon Lee; Roman A Laskowski; Seong Eon Ryu; Kokichi Sugihara; Deok-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Accessing protein conformational ensembles using room-temperature X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  James S Fraser; Henry van den Bedem; Avi J Samelson; P Therese Lang; James M Holton; Nathaniel Echols; Tom Alber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  De novo designed transmembrane peptides activating the α5β1 integrin.

Authors:  Marco Mravic; Hailin Hu; Zhenwei Lu; Joel S Bennett; Charles R Sanders; A Wayne Orr; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 1.650

7.  Design of structurally distinct proteins using strategies inspired by evolution.

Authors:  T M Jacobs; B Williams; T Williams; X Xu; A Eletsky; J F Federizon; T Szyperski; B Kuhlman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Practical Considerations for Atomistic Structure Modeling with Cryo-EM Maps.

Authors:  Doo Nam Kim; Dominik Gront; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Metal-mediated affinity and orientation specificity in a computationally designed protein homodimer.

Authors:  Bryan S Der; Mischa Machius; Michael J Miley; Jeffrey L Mills; Thomas Szyperski; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Engineered Biosensors from Dimeric Ligand-Binding Domains.

Authors:  Benjamin W Jester; Christine E Tinberg; Matthew S Rich; David Baker; Stanley Fields
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.