BACKGROUND: Treatment recommendations have been developed for management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: A 30-item multiple-choice questionnaire was administered to 435 hematologists and oncohematologists in 16 Latin American countries. Physicians self-reported their diagnostic, therapeutic, and disease management strategies. RESULTS: Imatinib is available as initial therapy to 92% of physicians, and 42% of physicians have access to both second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Standard-dose imatinib is the preferred initial therapy for most patients, but 20% would manage a young patient initially with an allogeneic stem cell transplant from a sibling donor, and 10% would only offer hydroxyurea to an elderly patient. Seventy-two percent of responders perform routine cytogenetic analysis for monitoring patients on therapy, and 59% routinely use quantitative polymerase chain reaction. For patients who fail imatinib therapy, 61% would increase the dose of imatinib before considering change to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, except for patients aged 60 years, for whom a switch to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor was the preferred choice. CONCLUSIONS: The answers to this survey provide insight into the management of patients with CML in Latin America. Some deviations from current recommendations were identified. Understanding the treatment patterns of patients with CML in broad population studies is important to identify needs and improve patient care.
BACKGROUND: Treatment recommendations have been developed for management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: A 30-item multiple-choice questionnaire was administered to 435 hematologists and oncohematologists in 16 Latin American countries. Physicians self-reported their diagnostic, therapeutic, and disease management strategies. RESULTS:Imatinib is available as initial therapy to 92% of physicians, and 42% of physicians have access to both second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Standard-dose imatinib is the preferred initial therapy for most patients, but 20% would manage a young patient initially with an allogeneic stem cell transplant from a sibling donor, and 10% would only offer hydroxyurea to an elderly patient. Seventy-two percent of responders perform routine cytogenetic analysis for monitoring patients on therapy, and 59% routinely use quantitative polymerase chain reaction. For patients who fail imatinib therapy, 61% would increase the dose of imatinib before considering change to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, except for patients aged 60 years, for whom a switch to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor was the preferred choice. CONCLUSIONS: The answers to this survey provide insight into the management of patients with CML in Latin America. Some deviations from current recommendations were identified. Understanding the treatment patterns of patients with CML in broad population studies is important to identify needs and improve patient care.
Authors: Michele Baccarani; Giuseppe Saglio; John Goldman; Andreas Hochhaus; Bengt Simonsson; Frederick Appelbaum; Jane Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Jorge Cortes; Michael Deininger; Alois Gratwohl; François Guilhot; Mary Horowitz; Timothy Hughes; Hagop Kantarjian; Richard Larson; Dietger Niederwieser; Richard Silver; Rudiger Hehlmann Journal: Blood Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hagop Kantarjian; Ricardo Pasquini; Vincent Lévy; Saengsuree Jootar; Jerzy Holowiecki; Nelson Hamerschlak; Timothy Hughes; Eric Bleickardt; David Dejardin; Jorge Cortes; Neil P Shah Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: G J Ruiz-Argüelles; L C Tarin-Arzaga; M L Gonzalez-Carrillo; K I Gutierrez-Riveroll; R Rangel-Malo; C H Gutiérrez-Aguirre; O G Cantú-Rodríguez; D Gómez-Almaguer; S Giralt Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Susan O'Brien; Jorge E Cortes; Jianqin Shan; Francis J Giles; Mary Beth Rios; Stefan H Faderl; William G Wierda; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Srdan Verstovsek; Michael J Keating; Emil J Freireich; Moshe Talpaz Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Elias Jabbour; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dan Jones; Jenny Shan; Susan O'Brien; Neeli Reddy; William G Wierda; Stefan Faderl; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Srdan Verstovsek; Mary Beth Rios; Jorge Cortes Journal: Blood Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: G Graffigna; I Cecchini; M Breccia; E Capochiani; R Della Seta; S Galimberti; A Melosi; F Simonetti; M Pizzuti; S F Capalbo; F Falzetti; P Mazza; N Di Renzo; L Mastrullo; D Rapezzi; E Orlandi; T Intermesoli; A Iurlo; E Pungolino; M Pacilli Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nelson Hamerschlak; Carmino de Souza; Ana Lúcia Cornacchioni; Ricardo Pasquini; Daniel Tabak; Nelson Spector; Merula Steagall Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jimena Ylescas-Soria; Alfredo H de la Torre-Lujan; Luis A Herrera; Daniela Miranda; Flavio Grimaldo; Silvia Rivas; Eduardo Cervera; Abelardo Meneses-García; Fidias E Leon-Sarmiento; Diddier Prada Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.452