Literature DB >> 20663971

Celiac disease: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Gabriele Masselli1, Antonio Picarelli, Marco Di Tola, Valerio Libanori, Giuseppe Donato, Elisabetta Polettini, Alessandra Piermattei, Piergaspare Palumbo, Angelo Pittalis, Annarita Saponara, Gianfranco Gualdi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine mural perfusion dynamics in patients with untreated celiac disease by using dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to compare these dynamics with those in a control population and in patients with celiac disease treated with a gluten-free diet.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent from all participants were obtained. Sixty consecutive patients with untreated celiac disease, 45 patients with celiac disease treated with a gluten-free diet for at least 1 year, and 30 control subjects were enrolled in this study. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed by using a 1.5-T MR unit. For each MR imaging examination, maximum enhancement, slope of enhancement, and time-signal intensity curves were calculated at the level of the descending duodenal wall. Duodenal wall thickness was also evaluated. Statistical evaluation was performed by using one-way analysis of variance, and the results were confirmed by using the Bartlett test for equal variances and complemented by using Bonferroni multiple comparison, linear correlation, and the Student t test for paired data.
RESULTS: Mean maximum enhancement of the duodenal wall was significantly higher in patients with untreated celiac disease (229.1 +/- 46.4 [standard deviation]) than in patients with treated celiac disease (109.8 +/- 27.8) and control subjects (94.7 +/- 17.9) (P < .001 for each comparison). All 60 untreated patients showed a curve characterized by fast enhancement and washout (type 4), while all 45 treated patients and the 30 control subjects showed a curve characterized by slow constant enhancement (type 2). Mean duodenal wall thickness was not significantly different between untreated patients (2.2 mm +/- 0.4), treated patients (2.0 mm +/- 0.3), and control subjects (2.0 mm +/- 0.4) (one-way analysis of variance, P = .4177; Bartlett test, P = .6951).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that dynamic evaluation of the bowel wall by using contrast-enhanced MR imaging can be an effective and reproducible way to show the inflammation state in celiac disease. (c) RSNA, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663971     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Endoluminal ultrasound applicators for MR-guided thermal ablation of pancreatic tumors: Preliminary design and evaluation in a porcine pancreas model.

Authors:  Matthew S Adams; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Juan Plata-Camargo; Peter D Jones; Aurea Pascal-Tenorio; Hsin-Yu Chen; Donna M Bouley; Graham Sommer; Kim Butts Pauly; Chris J Diederich
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Current tecniques and new perpectives research of magnetic resonance enterography in pediatric Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Ilaria Mastroiacovo; Emidio De Marco; Giulia Francione; Emanuele Casciani; Elisabetta Polettini; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-28

3.  Evaluation of celiac disease with uniphasic and multiphasic dynamic MDCT imaging.

Authors:  Cemil Göya; İlyas Dündar; Mesut Özgökçe; Saim Türkoğlu; Ensar Türko; Sercan Özkaçmaz; Gülay Aydoğdu; Necat Almalı
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-20

4.  Thermal therapy of pancreatic tumours using endoluminal ultrasound: Parametric and patient-specific modelling.

Authors:  Matthew S Adams; Serena J Scott; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Graham Sommer; Chris J Diederich
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Does contrast-enhanced computed tomography raise awareness in the diagnosis of the invisible side of celiac disease in adults?

Authors:  Cemil Göya; İlyas Dündar; Mesut Özgökçe; Ensar Türko; Sercan Özkaçmaz; Fatma Durmaz; Mesut Aydın; Ulaş Alabalık; Yusuf Geylani; Mehmet Arslan; Salih Hattapoğlu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-12

6.  Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses.

Authors:  Jingjing Chen; Youjiao Si; Kaikai Zhao; Xianglong Shi; Weiqun Bi; Shi-En Liu; Hui Hua
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Evaluation of duodenal perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in dogs with chronic inflammatory enteropathy and intestinal lymphoma.

Authors:  Khoirun Nisa; Sue Yee Lim; Masayoshi Shinohara; Tatsuyuki Osuga; Nozomu Yokoyama; Masahiro Tamura; Noriyuki Nagata; Kazuyoshi Sasaoka; Angkhana Dermlim; Rommaneeya Leela-Arporn; Tomoya Morita; Noboru Sasaki; Keitaro Morishita; Kensuke Nakamura; Hiroshi Ohta; Mitsuyoshi Takiguchi
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of small bowel neoplasms.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Emanuele Casciani; Elisabetta Polettini; Francesca Laghi; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Sesamol Protects Testis from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury through Scavenging Reactive Oxygen Species and Upregulating CREMτ Expression.

Authors:  Si-Ming Wei; Rong-Yun Wang; Yan-Song Chen
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.543

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.