Literature DB >> 20663616

Reproducibility of three classification systems of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using a web-based survey.

Fernando Schuh1, Jorge Villanova Biazús, Erika Resetkova, Camila Zanella Benfica, Maria Isabel Albano Edelweiss.   

Abstract

This study assessed the degree of diagnostic agreement among pathologists between three classification systems of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). Thirteen pathologists received the same set of digitized images of microscopy of 43 DCIS cases and answered a questionnaire containing the criteria to compose the three classification systems studied: Holland, modified Lagios, and Van Nuys. A computer program was created, which organizes the information collected from each pathologist, supplying the histological grading of the cases within the three classification systems. The results were analyzed using percental agreement and the Kappa test. Diagnostic agreement for the three DCIS of the breast classification systems presented K values that varied from 0.27 to 0.37. Among the three classifications used, most agreement was for Van Nuys, showing a Kappa index of 0.37. These results matched the interobserver agreements, with Kappa indices varying from 0.13 to 0.64 for the Holland classification; 0.23 to 0.61 for the modified Lagios classification; and 0.23 to 0.74 for the Van Nuys classification. Pathologists specialized in breast pathology showed greater reproducibility for all the criteria evaluated. Comparing the three classification systems, diagnostic agreement and accuracy were rated higher for the classification of Van Nuys compared to modified Lagios and Holland.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663616     DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Res Pract        ISSN: 0344-0338            Impact factor:   3.250


  9 in total

1.  Which factors influence MRI-pathology concordance of tumour size measurements in breast cancer?

Authors:  M Rominger; D Berg; T Frauenfelder; A Ramaswamy; N Timmesfeld
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Antonio Ponti; Ted James; Ondřej Májek; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ahti Anttila; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Alfonso Frigerio; Masaaki Kawai; Astrid Scharpantgen; Mireille Broeders; Solveig Hofvind; Carmen Vidal; Maria Ederra; Dolores Salas; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Mariano Tomatis; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen Taplin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Schuh; Jorge Villanova Biazús; Erika Resetkova; Camila Zanella Benfica; Alessandra de Freitas Ventura; Diego Uchoa; Márcia Graudenz; Maria Isabel Albano Edelweiss
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.644

4.  The clinical significance of accompanying NME on preoperative MR imaging in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Joon Jeong; Eun Ju Son; Ji Hyun Youk; Jeong-Ah Kim; Kyung Hee Ko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Deep learning-based grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast histopathology images.

Authors:  Suzanne C Wetstein; Nikolas Stathonikos; Josien P W Pluim; Yujing J Heng; Natalie D Ter Hoeve; Celien P H Vreuls; Paul J van Diest; Mitko Veta
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Variability in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ among an international group of pathologists.

Authors:  Esther H Lips; Jelle Wesseling; Maartje van Seijen; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Sarah E Pinder; Allison Hall; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Jeremy Sj Thomas; Laura C Collins; Jonathan Bijron; Joost Bart; Danielle Cohen; Wen Ng; Ihssane Bouybayoune; Hilary Stobart; Jan Hudecek; Michael Schaapveld; Alastair Thompson
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-02-23

7.  Inter-observer reproducibility of classical lobular neoplasia (B3 lesions) in preoperative breast biopsies: a study of the Swiss Working Group of breast and gynecopathologists.

Authors:  Linda Moskovszky; Barbara Berger; Achim Fleischmann; Thomas Friedrich; Birgit Helmchen; Meike Körner; Tilman T Rau; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Grading variation in 2,934 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the effect of laboratory- and pathologist-specific feedback reports.

Authors:  Carmen van Dooijeweert; Paul J van Diest; Inge O Baas; Elsken van der Wall; Ivette A G Deckers
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study.

Authors:  Emma J Groen; Jan Hudecek; Lennart Mulder; Maartje van Seijen; Mathilde M Almekinders; Stoyan Alexov; Anikó Kovács; Ales Ryska; Zsuzsanna Varga; Francisco-Javier Andreu Navarro; Simonetta Bianchi; Willem Vreuls; Eva Balslev; Max V Boot; Janina Kulka; Ewa Chmielik; Ellis Barbé; Mathilda J de Rooij; Winand Vos; Andrea Farkas; Natalja E Leeuwis-Fedorovich; Peter Regitnig; Pieter J Westenend; Loes F S Kooreman; Cecily Quinn; Giuseppe Floris; Gábor Cserni; Paul J van Diest; Esther H Lips; Michael Schaapveld; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.