Literature DB >> 20661845

Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks.

Marjolein Kok1, Jan Willem van der Steeg, Joris A M van der Post, Ben W J Mol.   

Abstract

We aimed to develop a predictive model for the chance of a successful external cephalic version (ECV). We performed a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton fetus in breech presentation with a gestational age of 36 weeks or more. Data on parity, maternal age, body mass index, ethnicity, gestational age, placental location, fetal position, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid were recorded in all participants. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with a stepwise backward selection procedure was used to construct a prediction model for the occurrence of successful ECV. We included a total of 310 women. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that multiparity, increasing estimated fetal weight, and normal amniotic fluid were favorable predictors of successful ECV. Anterior placenta location was an unfavorable predictor for ECV outcome. Discrimination of the model was fair (area under the curve 0.71), and the calibration of the model was acceptable. Our prediction model appears to discriminate between women with a poor chance of successful ECV (less than 20%) and women with a good chance of success (more than 60%). When this model is validated externally, it could be used for patient counseling and clinical decision making. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661845     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

1.  Breech presentation and the cornual-fundal location of the placenta.

Authors:  Slobodan Sekulić; Marko Ilinčić; Gordana Radeka; Aleksandra Novakov-Mikić; Svetlana Simić; Jelena Podgorac; Goran Keković
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 2.  Improving external cephalic version for foetal breech presentation.

Authors:  H Zandstra; H J M M Mertens
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects.

Authors:  Gwang Jun Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-10-08

4.  A prospective study using an individualized nomogram to predict the success rate of external cephalic version.

Authors:  Jing Lin; Wei Liu; Wei Gu; Ye Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  External cephalic version experiences in Korea.

Authors:  Mi-Young Kim; Min-Young Park; Gwang Jun Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16

6.  Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version.

Authors:  Jun Yi Lee; Yeorae Kim; In Sook Sohn; You Jung Han; Jin Hoon Chung; Moon Young Kim; Min Hyoung Kim; Hyun-Mee Ryu; SungHong Joo; Jung Yeol Han
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.