Literature DB >> 20661139

Age and sex differences, and changing trends, in the use of evidence-based therapies in acute coronary syndromes: perspectives from a multinational registry.

Hoa L Nguyen1, Robert J Goldberg, Joel M Gore, Keith A A Fox, Kim A Eagle, Enrique P Gurfinkel, Frederick A Spencer, George Reed, Ann Quill, Frederick A Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have examined the age and sex differences, and potentially changing trends, in cardiac medication and procedure use in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
METHODS: Using data from a large multinational study, we examined the age and sex differences, and changing trends (1999-2007) therein, in the hospital use of evidence-based therapies in patients hospitalized with an ACS using data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (n=50 096).
RESULTS: After adjustment for several variables, in comparison with men below 65 years, patients in other age-sex strata had a significantly lower odds of receiving aspirin [odds ratios (ORs) for men 65-74, 75-84, and >or=85 years, women <65, 65-74, 75-84, and >or=85 years were 0.86, 0.84, 0.72, 0.80, 0.86, 0.68 and 0.46, respectively], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ORs, 1.08, 1.01, 0,71, 0.83, 0.90, 0.89, and 0.63), beta blockers (ORs, 0.66, 0.52, 0.53, 0.67, 0.54, 0.53, and 0.52), statins (ORs, 0.72, 0.49, 0.29, 0.82, 0.68, 0.44, and 0.22), and undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery or a percutaneous coronary intervention (ORs, 0.79, 0.53, 0.21, 0.64, 0.57, 0.38, and 0.13) during their acute hospitalization. Age and sex differences in the receipt of these therapies remained relatively unchanged during the period under study.
CONCLUSION: Although there were increasing trends in the use of evidence-based medications and cardiac procedures over time, important gaps in the utilization of effective cardiac treatment modalities persist in elderly patients and younger women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661139     DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32833ce07c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Coron Artery Dis        ISSN: 0954-6928            Impact factor:   1.439


  18 in total

1.  Secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in older adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jerome L Fleg; Daniel E Forman; Kathy Berra; Vera Bittner; James A Blumenthal; Michael A Chen; Susan Cheng; Dalane W Kitzman; Mathew S Maurer; Michael W Rich; Win-Kuang Shen; Mark A Williams; Susan J Zieman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Do clinical factors explain persistent sex disparities in the use of acute reperfusion therapy in STEMI in Sweden and Canada?

Authors:  Nina Johnston; Anna Bornefalk-Hermansson; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Claes Held; Shaun G Goodman; Andrew T Yan; Arlene S Bierman
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2013-07-17

3.  Sex Differences in 1-Year Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Melissa M Farmer; Maggie A Stanislawski; Mary E Plomondon; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Nataria T Joseph; Lauren E Thompson; Jessica L Zuchowski; Stacie L Daugherty; Elizabeth M Yano; P Michael Ho
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Inequalities in lung cancer care of elderly patients with schizophrenia: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Cara Bergamo; Keith Sigel; Grace Mhango; Minal Kale; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Incidence, prognosis, and factors associated with cardiac arrest in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Registry).

Authors:  David D McManus; Farhan Aslam; Parag Goyal; Robert J Goldberg; Wei Huang; Joel M Gore
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.439

Review 6.  Are we any WISER yet? Progress and contemporary need for smart trials to include women in coronary artery disease trials.

Authors:  Ana Iribarren; Márcio Augusto Diniz; C Noel Bairey Merz; Chrisandra Shufelt; Janet Wei
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.261

Review 7.  Sex-based differences in cardiac ischaemic injury and protection: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  B Ostadal; P Ostadal
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Patients with chronic kidney disease/diabetes mellitus: the high-risk profile in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Usman Baber; Uschi Auguste
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Clopidogrel discontinuation after acute coronary syndromes: frequency, predictors and associations with death and myocardial infarction--a hospital registry-primary care linked cohort (MINAP-GPRD).

Authors:  Rachael Boggon; Tjeerd P van Staa; Adam Timmis; Harry Hemingway; Kausik K Ray; Alan Begg; Cathy Emmas; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Incomplete revascularization in the drug eluting stent era permits meaningful long-term (12-78 months) outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Qiao Xue; Jing Bai; Lei Gao; Jin-Wen Tian; Ke Li; Qiang Xu; Yan-Hua Li; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.