Literature DB >> 14605050

Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia.

Richard G Wunderink1, Jordi Rello, Sue K Cammarata, Rodney V Croos-Dabrera, Marin H Kollef.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of baseline variables, including treatment, on outcome in patients with nosocomial pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from two prospective, randomized, double-blind studies.
SETTING: Multinational study with 134 sites. PATIENTS: A total of 1,019 patients with suspected Gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia, including 339 patients with documented S aureus pneumonia (S aureus subset) and 160 patients with documented MRSA pneumonia (MRSA subset).
INTERVENTIONS: Linezolid, 600 mg, or vancomycin, 1 g, q12h for 7 to 21 days, each with aztreonam. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Outcome was measured by survival and clinical cure rates (assessed 12 to 28 days after the end of therapy). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the effect of treatment and other baseline variables on outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival rates for linezolid vs vancomycin were 80.0% (60 of 75 patients) vs 63.5% (54 of 85 patients) for the MRSA subset (p = 0.03). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that the survival difference favoring linezolid remained significant after adjusting for baseline variables (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 4.8; p = 0.05). Other baseline variables associated with significantly higher survival rates in MRSA pneumonia were serum creatinine levels less than or equal to two times the upper limit of normal and absence of cardiac comorbidities. Clinical cure rates for linezolid vs vancomycin (excluding indeterminate or missing outcomes) were 59.0% (36 of 61 patients) vs 35.5% (22 of 62 patients) for the MRSA subset (p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that the difference favoring linezolid remained significant after adjusting for baseline variables (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 8.3; p = 0.01). Other baseline variables associated with significantly higher clinical cure rates in MRSA pneumonia were single-lobe pneumonia, absence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and absence of oncologic and renal comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, initial therapy with linezolid was associated with significantly better survival and clinical cure rates than was vancomycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia due to MRSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  111 in total

1.  Monomer complexes of polyadenylic acid.

Authors:  R Jeremy; H Davies
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  The economic effect of screening orthopedic surgery patients preoperatively for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Ann E Wiringa; Rachel R Bailey; Vishal Goyal; Becky Tsui; G Jonathan Lewis; Robert R Muder; Lee H Harrison; Lee M Harrison
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Colonization, pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and therapeutics for Staphylococcus aureus: what is the clinical relevance?

Authors:  Steven Y C Tong; Luke F Chen; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 9.623

4.  Linezolid in VAP by MRSA: a better choice?

Authors:  Malina Ioanas; Hartmut Lode
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Screening cardiac surgery patients for MRSA: an economic computer model.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Ann E Wiringa; Rachel R Bailey; Vishal Goyal; G Jonathan Lewis; Becky Y K Tsui; Kenneth J Smith; Robert R Muder
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 6.  Linezolid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; David P Figgitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Improved outcomes with linezolid for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: better drug or reduced vancomycin susceptibility?

Authors:  Benjamin P Howden; Patrick G P Charles; Paul D R Johnson; Peter B Ward; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evidence-Based Study Design for Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia.

Authors:  George H Talbot; Anita Das; Stephanie Cush; Aaron Dane; Michele Wible; Roger Echols; Antoni Torres; Sue Cammarata; John H Rex; John H Powers; Thomas Fleming; Jeffrey Loutit; Steve Hoffmann
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Inflammation and the host response to injury, a large-scale collaborative project: patient-oriented research core--standard operating procedures for clinical care VII--Guidelines for antibiotic administration in severely injured patients.

Authors:  Michael A West; Ernest E Moore; Michael B Shapiro; Avery B Nathens; Joseph Cuschieri; Jeffrey L Johnson; Brian G Harbrecht; Joseph P Minei; Paul E Bankey; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-12

10.  Linezolid surveillance results for the United States: LEADER surveillance program 2011.

Authors:  Robert K Flamm; Rodrigo E Mendes; James E Ross; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.