Literature DB >> 20660123

Heightened attention to medical privacy: challenges for unbiased sample recruitment and a possible solution.

Ann Butler Nattinger1, Liliana E Pezzin, Rodney A Sparapani, Joan M Neuner, Toni K King, Purushottam W Laud.   

Abstract

Subject recruitment for epidemiologic studies is associated with major challenges due to privacy laws now common in many countries. Privacy policies regarding recruitment methods vary tremendously across institutions, partly because of a paucity of information about what methods are acceptable to potential subjects. The authors report the utility of an opt-out method without prior physician notification for recruiting community-dwelling US women aged 65 years or older with incident breast cancer in 2003. Participants (n = 3,083) and possibly eligible nonparticipants (n = 2,664) were compared using characteristics derived from billing claims. Participation for persons with traceable contact information was 70% initially (2005-2006) and remained over 90% for 3 follow-up surveys (2006-2008). Older subjects and those living in New York State were less likely to participate, but participation did not differ on the basis of socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, underlying health, or type of cancer treatment. Few privacy concerns were raised by potential subjects, and no complaints were lodged. Using opt-out methods without prior physician notification, a population-based cohort of older breast cancer subjects was successfully recruited. This strategy may be applicable to population-based studies of other diseases and is relevant to privacy boards making decisions about recruitment strategies acceptable to the public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660123      PMCID: PMC3025645          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  22 in total

1.  Medical privacy and medical research--judging the new federal regulations.

Authors:  George J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Reducing inequities in cancer care: the role of cancer registries.

Authors:  Rob Sanson-Fisher; Mariko Carey; Lisa Mackenzie; David Hill; Sharon Campbell; Donna Turner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Reforming the HIPAA Privacy Rule: safeguarding privacy and promoting research.

Authors:  Lawrence O Gostin; Sharyl Nass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The impact of the privacy rule on cancer research: variations in attitudes and application of regulatory standards.

Authors:  Elizabeth Goss; Michael P Link; Suanna S Bruinooge; Theodore S Lawrence; Joel E Tepper; Carolyn D Runowicz; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Nonresponse in a community cohort study: predictors and consequences for exposure-disease associations.

Authors:  Tomas M L Eagan; Geir E Eide; Amund Gulsvik; Per S Bakke
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Personality characteristics of health care satisfaction survey non-respondents.

Authors:  Thomas G McLeod; Brian A Costello; Robert C Colligan; Ross A Dierkhising; Timothy J Beebe; Kenneth P Offord; G Richard Locke
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2009

7.  Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research.

Authors:  Roberta B Ness
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.

Authors:  D J Willison; C Emerson; K V Szala-Meneok; E Gibson; L Schwartz; K M Weisbaum; F Fournier; K Brazil; M D Coughlin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patterns of consent in epidemiologic research: evidence from over 25,000 responders.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Kelvin Jordan; Rosie J Lacey; Mark Shapley; Clare Jinks
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  15 in total

1.  Fracture risk and adjuvant hormonal therapy among a population-based cohort of older female breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J M Neuner; T W Yen; R A Sparapani; P W Laud; A B Nattinger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Quality of life among a population-based cohort of older patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Joan M Neuner; Nathan Zokoe; Emily L McGinley; Liliana E Pezzin; Tina W F Yen; Marilyn M Schapira; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Socioeconomic and racial differences in treatment for breast cancer at a low-volume hospital.

Authors:  Amanda L Kong; Tina W F Yen; Liliana E Pezzin; Haiyan Miao; Rodney A Sparapani; Purushottam W Laud; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  An algorithm to identify the development of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Tina W F Yen; Purushuttom W Laud; Rodney A Sparapani; Jianing Li; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester epidemiology project.

Authors:  Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Socioeconomic factors associated with adjuvant hormone therapy use in older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tina W F Yen; Linda K Czypinski; Rodney A Sparapani; Changbin Guo; Purushottam W Laud; Liliana E Pezzin; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Reexamining the Relationship of Breast Cancer Hospital and Surgical Volume to Mortality: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Liliana E Pezzin; Purushottam Laud; Tina W F Yen; Joan Neuner; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Surgeon specialization and use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tina W F Yen; Purushuttom W Laud; Rodney A Sparapani; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Oksana Sayko; Liliana E Pezzin; Tina W F Yen; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 10.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.

Authors:  Walter A Rocca; Barbara P Yawn; Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.