Literature DB >> 20658710

No amicable divorce? Challenging the notion that sexual antagonism drives sex chromosome evolution.

Joseph E Ironside1.   

Abstract

Although sexual antagonism may have played a role in forming some sex chromosome systems, there appears to be little empirical or theoretical justification in assuming that it is the driving force in all cases of sex chromosome evolution. In many species, sex chromosomes have diverged in size and shape through the accumulation of mutations in regions of suppressed recombination. It is commonly assumed that recombination is suppressed in sex chromosomes due to selection to resolve sexually antagonistic pleiotropy. However, the requirement for a sex chromosome-specific mechanism for suppressing recombination is questionable, since more general models of recombination suppression on autosomes also appear to be applicable to sex chromosomes. Direct tests of the predictions of the sexual antagonism hypothesis offer only limited support in specific sex chromosome systems and circumstantial evidence remains open to interpretation.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658710     DOI: 10.1002/bies.200900124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  26 in total

1.  Transition from Environmental to Partial Genetic Sex Determination in Daphnia through the Evolution of a Female-Determining Incipient W Chromosome.

Authors:  Céline M O Reisser; Dominique Fasel; Evelin Hürlimann; Marinela Dukic; Cathy Haag-Liautard; Virginie Thuillier; Yan Galimov; Christoph R Haag
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Sheltering of deleterious mutations explains the stepwise extension of recombination suppression on sex chromosomes and other supergenes.

Authors:  Paul Jay; Emilie Tezenas; Amandine Véber; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 9.593

3.  Recent gene-capture on the UV sex chromosomes of the moss Ceratodon purpureus.

Authors:  Stuart F McDaniel; Kurt M Neubig; Adam C Payton; Ralph S Quatrano; David J Cove
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Contrasted patterns in mating-type chromosomes in fungi: hotspots versus coldspots of recombination.

Authors:  Alexander Idnurm; Michael E Hood; Hanna Johannesson; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  Fungal Biol Rev       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.706

Review 5.  Genomes and geography: genomic insights into the evolution and phylogeography of the genus Schistosoma.

Authors:  Scott P Lawton; Hirohisa Hirai; Joe E Ironside; David A Johnston; David Rollinson
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Chaos of Rearrangements in the Mating-Type Chromosomes of the Anther-Smut Fungus Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae.

Authors:  Hélène Badouin; Michael E Hood; Jérôme Gouzy; Gabriela Aguileta; Sophie Siguenza; Michael H Perlin; Christina A Cuomo; Cécile Fairhead; Antoine Branca; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Species and population level molecular profiling reveals cryptic recombination and emergent asymmetry in the dimorphic mating locus of C. reinhardtii.

Authors:  Peter L De Hoff; Patrick Ferris; Bradley J S C Olson; Ayano Miyagi; Sa Geng; James G Umen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Evolutionary strata on young mating-type chromosomes despite the lack of sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Sara Branco; Hélène Badouin; Ricardo C Rodríguez de la Vega; Jérôme Gouzy; Fantin Carpentier; Gabriela Aguileta; Sophie Siguenza; Jean-Tristan Brandenburg; Marco A Coelho; Michael E Hood; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Extensive divergence between mating-type chromosomes of the anther-smut fungus.

Authors:  Michael E Hood; Elsa Petit; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  How to make a sex chromosome.

Authors:  Alison E Wright; Rebecca Dean; Fabian Zimmer; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.