Literature DB >> 35853091

Sheltering of deleterious mutations explains the stepwise extension of recombination suppression on sex chromosomes and other supergenes.

Paul Jay1, Emilie Tezenas1,2,3, Amandine Véber3, Tatiana Giraud1.   

Abstract

Many organisms have sex chromosomes with large nonrecombining regions that have expanded stepwise, generating "evolutionary strata" of differentiation. The reasons for this remain poorly understood, but the principal hypotheses proposed to date are based on antagonistic selection due to differences between sexes. However, it has proved difficult to obtain empirical evidence of a role for sexually antagonistic selection in extending recombination suppression, and antagonistic selection has been shown to be unlikely to account for the evolutionary strata observed on fungal mating-type chromosomes. We show here, by mathematical modeling and stochastic simulation, that recombination suppression on sex chromosomes and around supergenes can expand under a wide range of parameter values simply because it shelters recessive deleterious mutations, which are ubiquitous in genomes. Permanently heterozygous alleles, such as the male-determining allele in XY systems, protect linked chromosomal inversions against the expression of their recessive mutation load, leading to the successive accumulation of inversions around these alleles without antagonistic selection. Similar results were obtained with models assuming recombination-suppressing mechanisms other than chromosomal inversions and for supergenes other than sex chromosomes, including those without XY-like asymmetry, such as fungal mating-type chromosomes. However, inversions capturing a permanently heterozygous allele were found to be less likely to spread when the mutation load segregating in populations was lower (e.g., under large effective population sizes or low mutation rates). This may explain why sex chromosomes remain homomorphic in some organisms but are highly divergent in others. Here, we model a simple and testable hypothesis explaining the stepwise extensions of recombination suppression on sex chromosomes, mating-type chromosomes, and supergenes in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35853091      PMCID: PMC9295944          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   9.593


  71 in total

Review 1.  Self-incompatibility in plants.

Authors:  Seiji Takayama; Akira Isogai
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 26.379

2.  THE ACCUMULATION OF SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC GENES AS A SELECTIVE AGENT PROMOTING THE EVOLUTION OF REDUCED RECOMBINATION BETWEEN PRIMITIVE SEX CHROMOSOMES.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Supergenes and complex phenotypes.

Authors:  Tanja Schwander; Romain Libbrecht; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers.

Authors:  Marco Todesco; Gregory L Owens; Natalia Bercovich; Jean-Sébastien Légaré; Shaghayegh Soudi; Dylan O Burge; Kaichi Huang; Katherine L Ostevik; Emily B M Drummond; Ivana Imerovski; Kathryn Lande; Mariana A Pascual-Robles; Mihir Nanavati; Mojtaba Jahani; Winnie Cheung; S Evan Staton; Stéphane Muños; Rasmus Nielsen; Lisa A Donovan; John M Burke; Sam Yeaman; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertorelle; Francesca Raffini; Hernán E Morales; Cock van Oosterhout; Mirte Bosse; Chiara Bortoluzzi; Alessio Iannucci; Emiliano Trucchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 59.581

6.  Mating-type heterokaryosis and selfing in Cryphonectria parasitica.

Authors:  I Cristina McGuire; Robert E Marra; Michael G Milgroom
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.

Authors:  Bernard Y Kim; Christian D Huber; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Consequences of partially recessive deleterious genetic variation for the evolution of inversions suppressing recombination between sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Colin Olito; Suvi Ponnikas; Bengt Hansson; Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Gene-rich UV sex chromosomes harbor conserved regulators of sexual development.

Authors:  Sarah B Carey; Jerry Jenkins; John T Lovell; Florian Maumus; Avinash Sreedasyam; Adam C Payton; Shengqiang Shu; George P Tiley; Noe Fernandez-Pozo; Adam Healey; Kerrie Barry; Cindy Chen; Mei Wang; Anna Lipzen; Chris Daum; Christopher A Saski; Jordan C McBreen; Roth E Conrad; Leslie M Kollar; Sanna Olsson; Sanna Huttunen; Jacob B Landis; J Gordon Burleigh; Norman J Wickett; Matthew G Johnson; Stefan A Rensing; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Stuart F McDaniel
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff.

Authors:  Clemens Küpper; Michael Stocks; Judith E Risse; Natalie Dos Remedios; Lindsay L Farrell; Susan B McRae; Tawna C Morgan; Natalia Karlionova; Pavel Pinchuk; Yvonne I Verkuil; Alexander S Kitaysky; John C Wingfield; Theunis Piersma; Kai Zeng; Jon Slate; Mark Blaxter; David B Lank; Terry Burke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sex chromosome differentiation via changes in the Y chromosome repeat landscape in African annual killifishes Nothobranchius furzeri and N. kadleci.

Authors:  Jana Štundlová; Monika Hospodářská; Karolína Lukšíková; Anna Voleníková; Tomáš Pavlica; Marie Altmanová; Annekatrin Richter; Martin Reichard; Martina Dalíková; Šárka Pelikánová; Anatolie Marta; Sergey A Simanovsky; Matyáš Hiřman; Marek Jankásek; Tomáš Dvořák; Joerg Bohlen; Petr Ráb; Christoph Englert; Petr Nguyen; Alexandr Sember
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.620

2.  Consequences of partially recessive deleterious genetic variation for the evolution of inversions suppressing recombination between sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Colin Olito; Suvi Ponnikas; Bengt Hansson; Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.171

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.