PURPOSE: To determine if 3.0-T proton-decoupled phosphorus 31 ((31)P) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy can be used to differentiate between stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by resolving the components of phosphomonoester (PME) and phosphodiester (PDE) and enabling detection of a greater number of other phosphorus-containing compounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Helsinki University Central Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects. A 3.0-T clinical imager was used to obtain proton-decoupled (31)P MR spectra in the liver of control subjects (n = 12), patients with biopsy-proved simple steatosis due to nonalcoholic causes (nonalcoholic fatty liver, n = 13; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH], n = 9), and patients with cirrhosis (n = 9) to determine PME, phosphoethanolamine (PE), phosphocholine, PDE, glycerophosphocholine (GPC), glycerophosphoryl ethanolamine, uridine diphosphoglucose, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), inorganic phosphate, phosphoenolpyruvate, and alpha-, beta- and gamma-nucleotide triphosphate levels. Liver fat was determined with hydrogen 1 MR spectroscopy. Differences between the disease groups were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The PME/(PME + PDE), PME/PDE, and PE/(PME + PDE) ratios were higher and the GPC/(PME + PDE) ratio was lower in patients with cirrhosis than in the other study groups (P < or = .001, one-way analysis of variance). The NADPH/(PME + PDE) ratio was higher in patients with NASH and those with cirrhosis than in control subjects (P < .05, post hoc analyses) and correlated with disease severity (P = .007). CONCLUSION: NADPH, a marker of inflammation and fibrinogenic activity in the liver, is increased in patients with NASH and those with cirrhosis. Proton-decoupled (31)P 3.0-T MR spectroscopy shows promise in the differentiation of NAFLD stages.
PURPOSE: To determine if 3.0-T proton-decoupled phosphorus 31 ((31)P) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy can be used to differentiate between stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by resolving the components of phosphomonoester (PME) and phosphodiester (PDE) and enabling detection of a greater number of other phosphorus-containing compounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Helsinki University Central Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects. A 3.0-T clinical imager was used to obtain proton-decoupled (31)P MR spectra in the liver of control subjects (n = 12), patients with biopsy-proved simple steatosis due to nonalcoholic causes (nonalcoholic fatty liver, n = 13; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH], n = 9), and patients with cirrhosis (n = 9) to determine PME, phosphoethanolamine (PE), phosphocholine, PDE, glycerophosphocholine (GPC), glycerophosphoryl ethanolamine, uridine diphosphoglucose, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), inorganic phosphate, phosphoenolpyruvate, and alpha-, beta- and gamma-nucleotide triphosphate levels. Liver fat was determined with hydrogen 1 MR spectroscopy. Differences between the disease groups were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The PME/(PME + PDE), PME/PDE, and PE/(PME + PDE) ratios were higher and the GPC/(PME + PDE) ratio was lower in patients with cirrhosis than in the other study groups (P < or = .001, one-way analysis of variance). The NADPH/(PME + PDE) ratio was higher in patients with NASH and those with cirrhosis than in control subjects (P < .05, post hoc analyses) and correlated with disease severity (P = .007). CONCLUSION:NADPH, a marker of inflammation and fibrinogenic activity in the liver, is increased in patients with NASH and those with cirrhosis. Proton-decoupled (31)P 3.0-T MR spectroscopy shows promise in the differentiation of NAFLD stages.
Authors: Marek Chmelík; Ladislav Valkovič; Peter Wolf; Wolfgang Bogner; Martin Gajdošík; Emina Halilbasic; Stephan Gruber; Michael Trauner; Michael Krebs; Siegfried Trattnig; Martin Krššák Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jérémy Dana; Aïna Venkatasamy; Antonio Saviano; Joachim Lupberger; Yujin Hoshida; Valérie Vilgrain; Pierre Nahon; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Gallix; Thomas F Baumert Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 9.029
Authors: Wybe J M van der Kemp; Bertine L Stehouwer; Jurgen H Runge; Jannie P Wijnen; Aart J Nederveen; Peter R Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Stefan Traussnigg; Christian Kienbacher; Martin Gajdošík; Ladislav Valkovič; Emina Halilbasic; Judith Stift; Christian Rechling; Harald Hofer; Petra Steindl-Munda; Peter Ferenci; Fritz Wrba; Siegfried Trattnig; Martin Krššák; Michael Trauner Journal: Liver Int Date: 2017-05-20 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Lucian A B Purvis; William T Clarke; Ladislav Valkovič; Christina Levick; Michael Pavlides; Eleanor Barnes; Jeremy F Cobbold; Matthew D Robson; Christopher T Rodgers Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zohre Mozduri; Bara Lo; Nathalie Marty-Gasset; Ali Akbar Masoudi; Julien Arroyo; Mireille Morisson; Cécile Canlet; Agnès Bonnet; Cécile M D Bonnefont Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 4.566