Literature DB >> 20654658

Optimal swab processing recovery method for detection of bioterrorism-related Francisella tularensis by real-time PCR.

Roblena E Walker1, Jeannine M Petersen, Kenyatta W Stephens, Leslie A Dauphin.   

Abstract

Francisella tularensis, the etiological agent of tularemia, is regarded as a potential bioterrorism agent. The advent of bioterrorism has heightened awareness of the need for validated methods for processing environmental samples. In this study we determined the optimal method for processing environmental swabs for the recovery and subsequent detection of F. tularensis by the use of real-time PCR assays. Four swab processing recovery methods were compared: heat, sonication, vortexing, and the Swab Extraction Tube System (SETS). These methods were evaluated using cotton, foam, polyester and rayon swabs spiked with six pathogenic strains of F. tularensis. Real-time PCR analysis using a multi-target 5'nuclease assay for F. tularensis showed that the use of the SETS method resulted in the best limit of detection when evaluated using multiple strains of F. tularensis. We demonstrated also that the efficiency of F. tularensis recovery from swab specimens was not equivalent for all swab processing methodologies and, thus, that this variable can affect real-time PCR assay sensitivity. The effectiveness of the SETS method was independent of the automated DNA extraction method and real-time PCR platforms used. In conclusion, diagnostic laboratories can now potentially incorporate the SETS method into specimen processing protocols for the rapid and efficient detection of F. tularensis by real-time PCR during laboratory bioterrorism-related investigations. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20654658     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  4 in total

1.  Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Autumn S Downey; Sandra M Da Silva; Nathan D Olson; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Swab protocol for rapid laboratory diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax.

Authors:  Leslie A Dauphin; Chung K Marston; Vinod Bhullar; Daniel Baker; Mahmudur Rahman; M Jahangir Hossain; Apurba Chakraborty; Salah Uddin Khan; Alex R Hoffmaster
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of eight methods for the extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus spore DNA from eleven common interferents and a common swab.

Authors:  Helen L Rose; Caroline A Dewey; Morgan S Ely; Sarah L Willoughby; Tanya M Parsons; Victoria Cox; Phillippa M Spencer; Simon A Weller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of a microfluidic chip system for preparation of bacterial DNA from swabs, air, and surface water samples.

Authors:  Sandra Julich; Helmut Hotzel; Claudia Gärtner; Daniel Trouchet; Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly Ahmed; Nicole Kemper; Herbert Tomaso
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.856

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.