Literature DB >> 20653322

Analysis of the plantar pressure distribution in children with foot deformities.

Jolanta Pauk1, Kristina Daunoraviciene, Mikhaił Ihnatouski, Julius Griskevicius, James V Raso.   

Abstract

This paper describes the method of measuring and assessing the pressure distribution under typical feet and the feet of patients with deformities such as: planovalgus, clubfoot, and pes planus using a pedobarograph. Foot pressure distribution was measured during static and walking at individual normal walking speed. Time-series pressure measurements for all sensors were grouped into five anatomical areas of human foot. In typical subjects, the heel was the first part of the foot receiving the loading of the body. Then it moved to the toe through the midfoot and the metatarsal area. The highest mean pressure in typical subjects was found under the heel and the metatarsal heads. The lowest pressure distribution was under the cuboid bone. In the planovalgus subjects, a higher pressure distribution was found under cuboid bone compared to typical one. In the pes cavus subjects, the pressure distribution was lower under all parts of foot. In the clubfoot subjects, the pressure distribution, the contact area of each mask, and the time of foot contact area in left and right foot are respectively different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20653322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Bioeng Biomech        ISSN: 1509-409X            Impact factor:   1.073


  10 in total

1.  Effect of Thoracic Kyphosis and Lumbar Lordosis on the Distribution of Ground Reaction Forces on the Feet.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Żurawski; Zbigniew Śliwiński; Edyta Suliga; Grzegorz Śliwiński; Żaneta Wypych; Wojciech Kiebzak
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Correlation of foot posture index with plantar pressure and radiographic measurements in pediatric flatfoot.

Authors:  Jung Su Lee; Ki Beom Kim; Jin Ook Jeong; Na Yeon Kwon; Sang Mi Jeong
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-02-28

3.  Fatigue Effect on Linear Center of Pressure Measures during Gait in People with Flat Feet.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Sanjari; Sahar Boozari; Ali Ashraf Jamshidi; Mohammad Reza Nikmaram
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2016-09-18

4.  Sex Differences in Pedobarographic Findings and Relationship between Radiographic and Pedobarographic Measurements in Young Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Seungbum Koo; Sangho Chun; Kyoung Min Lee; Byung Chae Cho; Young-Jun Koo; Dong-Wan Kang; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-18

5.  Plantar Pressure Distribution of Right and Left Foot in Bilateral Clubfoot Treated by Ponseti Method: A Correlation Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Chao Xu; Yong-Gang Zhu; Ya-Bo Yan; Lu-Yu Huang; Wei Lei
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-22

6.  Effect of twister wrap orthosis on foot pressure distribution and balance in diplegic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Eid; Sobhy M Aly; Rasha A Mohamed
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  A novel implantable mechanism-based tendon transfer surgery for adult acquired flatfoot deformity: Evaluating feasibility in biomechanical simulation.

Authors:  Hantao Ling; Ravi Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Plantar pressures in individuals with normal and pronated feet according to static squat depths.

Authors:  Da Hyun Koh; Jong Dae Lee; Kyoung Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

9.  The Effect of Different Foot Orthosis Inverted Angles on Plantar Pressure in Children with Flexible Flatfeet.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Bok; Hyunkeun Lee; Bong-Ok Kim; Soyoung Ahn; Youngshin Song; Insik Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of the association between postural control and sagittal curvature of the spine.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Łukaz Żurawski; Wojciech Piotr Kiebzak; Ireneusz M Kowalski; Grzegorz Śliwiński; Zbigniew Śliwiński
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.