Literature DB >> 20652695

Estimating implant survival in the presence of competing risks.

David J Biau1, Moussa Hamadouche.   

Abstract

In medical research, commonly, one is interested in the time to the occurrence of a particular event, such as the revision of an implant, and the analysis of these data is referred to as survival analysis. However, for some patients, the event is not observed and their observations are censored. These censored observations are particular to survival data and require specific methods for estimation. The Kaplan and Meier method is a popular method to estimate the probability of being free of the event over time and it is now widely applied in orthopaedics such as to report implant survival. However, one of the assumptions underlying the Kaplan-Meier estimator implies that patients whose observations are censored have the same risk of occurrence of the event than patients remaining in the study. However, because the revision of an implant cannot occur after a patient dies, and that dead patients have their observations censored in the Kaplan-Meier method, another setting must be considered. In the sequel we will demonstrate the inadequacy of the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate implant survival and detail the cumulative incidence estimator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20652695      PMCID: PMC3032115          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1097-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Survival analysis in total joint replacement: an alternative method of accounting for the presence of competing risk.

Authors:  P Fennema; J Lubsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-05

2.  Survival of total knee replacement with a megaprosthesis after bone tumor resection.

Authors:  David Biau; Florent Faure; Sandrine Katsahian; Cécile Jeanrot; Bernard Tomeno; Philippe Anract
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

Authors:  H Putter; M Fiocco; R B Geskus
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases.

Authors:  F Falez; F Favetti; F Casella; G Panegrossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Competing events influence estimated survival probability: when is Kaplan-Meier analysis appropriate?

Authors:  David Jean Biau; Aurélien Latouche; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Survivorship of total hip replacements.

Authors:  H S Dobbs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1980-05

8.  Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18.5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Pierre Boutin; Jacques Daussange; Mark E Bolander; Laurent Sedel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years: excellent ten to 16-year follow-up results with a HA-coated stem.

Authors:  H Wangen; P Lereim; I Holm; R Gunderson; O Reikerås
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Ipsilateral femoral autograft reconstruction after resection of a pelvic tumor.

Authors:  David J Biau; Fabrice Thévenin; Valérie Dumaine; Antoine Babinet; Bernard Tomeno; Philippe Anract
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  8 in total

1.  How to deal with lost to follow-up in total knee arthroplasty : a new method based on the competing risks approach.

Authors:  Klaas-Auke Nouta; Bart G Pijls; Marta Fiocco; J Christiaan Keurentjes; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Total Hip Arthroplasty, state of the art for the 21st century.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Courpied; Jacques Henri Caton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Overestimates the Risk of Revision Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Lacny; Todd Wilson; Fiona Clement; Derek J Roberts; Peter D Faris; William A Ghali; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Does competing risk analysis give useful information about endoprosthetic survival in extremity osteosarcoma?

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Alexandra Kaider; Reinhard Windhager; Philipp T Funovics
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years.

Authors:  Guillaume Riouallon; Benjamin Bouyer; Stéphane Wolff
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Short-term Safety of a Silicone Gel-filled Breast Implant: A Manufacturer-sponsored, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Seanhyuck Yoon; Jae-Hoon Chang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-14

7.  Classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Who should have surgery?

Authors:  Y Kuroda; T Tanaka; T Miyagawa; T Kawai; K Goto; S Tanaka; S Matsuda; H Akiyama
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  A Preliminary Retrospective Study to Assess the Short-Term Safety of Traditional Smooth or Microtextured Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Korea.

Authors:  Sanghyuk Han; Robert Kim; Tae Seob Kim; Jung Heum Park; Seung Soo Kim; Cheol Jeong; Ji Heui Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.