Literature DB >> 20652461

Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry: aligning operations with information technology.

Elizabeth W Paxton1, Maria C S Inacio, Monti Khatod, Eric J Yue, Robert S Namba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A Total Joint Replacement Registry was developed in a large community-based practice to track implant utilization, monitor revisions and complications, identify patients during recalls and advisories, and provide feedback on clinical practices. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We describe the development, implementation, and integration of this Total Joint Replacement Registry, highlighting critical steps in aligning information technology and operations.
METHODS: The primary Total Joint Replacement Registry data source consists of standardized electronic health record forms developed by consensus. The Total Joint Replacement Registry forms are integrated into the clinical workflow (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and produce a standardized progress note for electronic health record documentation. Secondary data are extracted from other electronic data sources using standard terminologies (ie, ICD-9 codes) to supplement the Total Joint Replacement Registry forms. Electronic screening algorithms are applied to identify complications, in combination with chart review validation and quality control mechanisms.
RESULTS: Three hundred fifty surgeons voluntarily contribute to the registry with 90% participation. The registry has been used for implant recalls and advisories, contract decision making, and identification of patients at risk for revisions (eg, younger patients having total knee arthroplasty). Tracking of overall survival of implants influenced clinical practice, with feedback resulting in the reduction of the number of unicompartmental and uncemented knee arthroplasties performed, usage of femoral head sizes < 28 mm, and the number of minimally invasive surgical procedures performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The Total Joint Replacement Registry has effectively aligned operations with information technology and leveraged that to enhance our ability to respond to recalls and advisories as well as improve quality of care, cost-effectiveness, and create research opportunities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20652461      PMCID: PMC3049637          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1463-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register.

Authors:  Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Thomas Eisler; Göran Garellick; Peter Söderman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties.

Authors:  L I Havelin; L B Engesaeter; B Espehaug; O Furnes; S A Lie; S E Vollset
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-08

4.  Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Jordana Schmier; Fionna Mowat; Khaled Saleh; Eva Dybvik; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes; Henrik Malchau; Edmund Lau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Knee replacement: epidemiology, outcomes, and trends in Southern California: 17,080 replacements from 1995 through 2004.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Maria Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Stefano A Bini; Robert S Namba; Raoul J Burchette; Donald C Fithian
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-04

7.  How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Thomas Barber; Elizabeth Paxton; Robert Namba; Donald Fithian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Early and late manipulation improve flexion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert S Namba; Maria Inacio
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Ke Zhao; Michael Kelly; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  43 in total

1.  CORR Insights ®: The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.

Authors:  John M Clark
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Electronic Health Records, Registries, and Quality Measures: What? Why? How?

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; David Walker; Brett Thomson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Are There Modifiable Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a US Healthcare System?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Jasvinder A Singh; Rebecca Love; Stefano A Bini; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Steven Kurtz; Rebecca Love; Guy Cafri; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Metal-on-conventional polyethylene total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces have a higher risk of revision than metal-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene: results from a US registry.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Robert S Namba; Rebecca Love; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Transforming care delivery through health information technology.

Authors:  Benjamin Wheatley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

7.  Association of Type and Frequency of Postsurgery Care with Revision Surgery after Total Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Heather A Prentice; Priscilla H Chan; Robert S Namba; Maria Cs Inacio; Art Sedrakyan; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-10-11

8.  Association of Bisphosphonate Use and Risk of Revision After THA: Outcomes From a US Total Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Maria C S Inacio; Richard M Dell; Stefano A Bini; Elizabeth W Paxton; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A wear simulation study of nanostructured CVD diamond-on-diamond articulation involving concave/convex mating surfaces.

Authors:  Paul A Baker; Raymond G Thompson; Shane A Catledge
Journal:  J Coat Technol Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.382

10.  Validity and efficiency of a smartphone-based electronic data collection tool for operative data in rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Sambit Sahoo; Jill Mohr; Gregory J Strnad; Jose Vega; Morgan Jones; Mark S Schickendantz; Lutul Farrow; Kurt P Spindler; Joseph P Iannotti; Eric T Ricchetti; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.