Literature DB >> 20652369

Meta-analysis of genetic association studies: magic tool or dangerous black box?

Cosetta Minelli1, John Thompson.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20652369     DOI： 10.1007/s10654-010-9492-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN： 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Authors:  D Moher; A Jones; L Lepage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes.

Authors:  Helen M Colhoun; Paul M McKeigue; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  A systematic review evaluating the methodological aspects of meta-analyses of genetic association studies in cancer research.

Authors:  Stefania Boccia; Emma De Feo; Paola Gallì; Francesco Gianfagna; Rosarita Amore; Gualtiero Ricciardi
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.

Authors:  Anthony Delaney; Sean M Bagshaw; Andre Ferland; Braden Manns; Kevin B Laupland; Christopher J Doig
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature.

Authors:  Zhenglun Pan; Thomas A Trikalinos; Fotini K Kavvoura; Joseph Lau; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  The quality of meta-analyses of genetic association studies: a review with recommendations.

Authors:  Cosetta Minelli; John R Thompson; Keith R Abrams; Ammarin Thakkinstian; John Attia
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 4.897
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.