Literature DB >> 20652088

Current-Controlled Electrical Point-Source Stimulation of Embryonic Stem Cells.

Michael Q Chen1, Xiaoyan Xie, Kitchener D Wilson, Ning Sun, Joseph C Wu, Laurent Giovangrandi, Gregory T A Kovacs.   

Abstract

Stem cell therapy is emerging as a promising clinical approach for myocardial repair. However, the interactions between the graft and host, resulting in inconsistent levels of integration, remain largely unknown. In particular, the influence of electrical activity of the surrounding host tissue on graft differentiation and integration is poorly understood. In order to study this influence under controlled conditions, an in vitro system was developed. Electrical pacing of differentiating murine embryonic stem (ES) cells was performed at physiologically relevant levels through direct contact with microelectrodes, simulating the local activation resulting from contact with surrounding electroactive tissue. Cells stimulated with a charged balanced voltage-controlled current source for up to 4 days were analyzed for cardiac and ES cell gene expression using real-time PCR, immunofluorescent imaging, and genome microarray analysis. Results varied between ES cells from three progressive differentiation stages and stimulation amplitudes (nine conditions), indicating a high sensitivity to electrical pacing. Conditions that maximally encouraged cardiomyocyte differentiation were found with Day 7 EBs stimulated at 30 microA. The resulting gene expression included a sixfold increase in troponin-T and a twofold increase in beta-MHCwithout increasing ES cell proliferation marker Nanog. Subsequent genome microarray analysis revealed broad transcriptome changes after pacing. Concurrent to upregulation of mature gene programs including cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems is the apparent downregulation of important self-renewal and pluripotency genes. Overall, a robust system capable of long-term stimulation of ES cells is demonstrated, and specific conditions are outlined that most encourage cardiomyocyte differentiation.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20652088      PMCID: PMC2905819          DOI: 10.1007/s12195-009-0096-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng        ISSN: 1865-5025            Impact factor:   2.321


  31 in total

Review 1.  Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart.

Authors:  Eric N Olson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Electrical stimulation modulates fate determination of differentiating embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Masahisa Yamada; Kentaro Tanemura; Seiji Okada; Akio Iwanami; Masaya Nakamura; Hideaki Mizuno; Michiru Ozawa; Ritsuko Ohyama-Goto; Naohito Kitamura; Masako Kawano; Kyoko Tan-Takeuchi; Chiho Ohtsuka; Atsushi Miyawaki; Akihiko Takashima; Masaharu Ogawa; Yoshiaki Toyama; Hideyuki Okano; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  DNER acts as a neuron-specific Notch ligand during Bergmann glial development.

Authors:  Mototsugu Eiraku; Akira Tohgo; Katsuhiko Ono; Megumi Kaneko; Kazuto Fujishima; Tomoo Hirano; Mineko Kengaku
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  H Sauer; G Rahimi; J Hescheler; M Wartenberg
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  A model study of extracellular stimulation of cardiac cells.

Authors:  L J Leon; F A Roberge
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of human embryonic stem cells differentiating to cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Beqqali; Jantine Kloots; Dorien Ward-van Oostwaard; Christine Mummery; Robert Passier
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Cardiomyocytes differentiated in vitro from embryonic stem cells developmentally express cardiac-specific genes and ionic currents.

Authors:  V A Maltsev; A M Wobus; J Rohwedel; M Bader; J Hescheler
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Islet1 cardiovascular progenitors: a single source for heart lineages?

Authors:  Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Alessandra Moretti; Leslie Caron; Atsushi Nakano; Kenneth R Chien
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Electromechanical integration of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Izhak Kehat; Leonid Khimovich; Oren Caspi; Amira Gepstein; Rona Shofti; Gil Arbel; Irit Huber; Jonathan Satin; Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor; Lior Gepstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-09-26       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Mark H Soonpaa; Eric D Adler; Torsten K Roepke; Steven J Kattman; Marion Kennedy; Els Henckaerts; Kristina Bonham; Geoffrey W Abbott; R Michael Linden; Loren J Field; Gordon M Keller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  A device for separated and reversible co-culture of cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Michael Q Chen; R Hollis Whittington; Peter W Day; Brian K Kobilka; Laurent Giovangrandi; Gregory T A Kovacs
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Electrical and Mechanical Strategies to Enable Cardiac Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Hung Cao; Bong Jin Kang; Chia-An Lee; K Kirk Shung; Tzung K Hsiai
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-05-11

3.  Spatially and Temporally Controlled Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jeroen Leijten; Jungmok Seo; Kan Yue; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago; Ali Tamayol; Guillermo U Ruiz-Esparza; Su Ryon Shin; Roholah Sharifi; Iman Noshadi; Mario Moisés Álvarez; Yu Shrike Zhang; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng R Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 36.214

Review 4.  Use of flow, electrical, and mechanical stimulation to promote engineering of striated muscles.

Authors:  Swathi Rangarajan; Lauran Madden; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  High-throughput approaches for screening and analysis of cell behaviors.

Authors:  Jungmok Seo; Jung-Youn Shin; Jeroen Leijten; Oju Jeon; Gulden Camci-Unal; Anna D Dikina; Katelyn Brinegar; Amir M Ghaemmaghami; Eben Alsberg; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Concise review: carbon nanotechnology: perspectives in stem cell research.

Authors:  Marina V Pryzhkova
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 7.  Engineering the human pluripotent stem cell microenvironment to direct cell fate.

Authors:  Laurie B Hazeltine; Joshua A Selekman; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 8.  Physical developmental cues for the maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Renjun Zhu; Adriana Blazeski; Ellen Poon; Kevin D Costa; Leslie Tung; Kenneth R Boheler
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 6.832

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.