| Literature DB >> 20652040 |
Hike Nikiyan1, Alexey Vasilchenko, Dmitry Deryabin.
Abstract
The effect of a relative humidity (RH) in a range of 93-65% on morphological and elastic properties of Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli cells was evaluated using atomic force microscopy. It is shown that gradual dehumidification of bacteria environment has no significant effect on cell dimensional features and considerably decreases them only at 65% RH. The increasing of the bacteria cell wall roughness and elasticity occurs at the same time. Observed changes indicate that morphological properties of B. cereus are rather stable in wide range of relative humidity, whereas E. coli are more sensitive to drying, significantly increasing roughness and stiffness parameters at RH </= 84% RH. It is discussed the dependence of the response features on differences in cell wall structure of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial cells.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20652040 PMCID: PMC2905907 DOI: 10.1155/2010/704170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Figure 1AFM phase images of B. cereus (a) and E. coli (b) on mica surface at 93% RH. The white bar indicates 1 μm. There are no qualitative changes that can be seen in the pictures at different RH values.
Morphological characteristics of B. cereus and E. coli.
| Strain | RH (%) | Morphological characteristics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length min-max ( | Width min-max ( | Height min-max ( | Perimeter section ( | Area section ( | Volume ( | ||
| B. cereusip5832 | 93 | 2.97 ± 0.51 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 2.14 ± 0.19 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.71 ± 0.19 |
| 2.03−3.88 | 0.87−1.26 | 0.24−0.35 | |||||
| 84 | 2.93 ± 0.32 | 1.09 ± 0.11 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 2.15 ± 0.16 | 0.24±0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.14 | |
| 2.36−3.59 | 0.88−1.30 | 0.23−0.31 | |||||
| 75 | 2.89 ± 0.51 | 1.04 ± 0.05 | 0.27 ± 0.27 | 2.06 ± 0.11 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.13 | |
| 2.03−3.82 | 0.95−1.14 | 0.22−0.32 | |||||
| 65 | 2.85 ± 0.60 | 0.96 ± 0.12** | 0.27 ± 0.36 | 1.93 ± 0.20** | 0.20 ± 0.04** | 0.58 ± 0.18 | |
| 1.54−4.16 | 0.69−1.19 | 0.16−0.32 | |||||
| E. coli K12 | 93 | 2.46 ± 0.35 | 1.25 ± 0.26 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 2.28 ± 0.40 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.14 |
| 2.03−3.38 | 0.77−1.59 | 0.15−0.22 | |||||
| 84 | 2.13 ± 0.33 | 1.27 ± 0.12 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 2.31 ± 0.19 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.12 | |
| 1.50−2.82 | 1.10−1.46 | 0.15−0.24 | |||||
| 75 | 2.35 ± 0.40 | 1.27 ± 0.17 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 2.31 ± 0.27 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.11 | |
| 1.65−2.99 | 0.96−1.58 | 0.15−0.25 | |||||
| 65 | 2.30 ± 0.57 | 1.10 ± 0.19* | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 2.06 ± 0.32 | 0.18 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.18 | |
| 1.49−3.54 | 0.71−1.48 | 0.14−0.27 | |||||
*−P < .05; **− P < .01 (Wilcoxon's signed-rank test).
Figure 2Roughness distribution of B. cereus (a) and E. coli (b).
Figure 3Diagram of Young's modulus distribution; *−P < .05 (Wilcoxon's signed-rank test).