Literature DB >> 20651194

MR elastography: Spleen stiffness measurements in healthy volunteers--preliminary experience.

Lorenzo Mannelli1, Edmund Godfrey, Ilse Joubert, Andrew J Patterson, Martin J Graves, Ferdia A Gallagher, David J Lomas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to establish the range of normal splenic stiffness in healthy volunteers using MR elastography (MRE) and to investigate any correlation with physiologic parameters and driver position. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen volunteers (mean [+/- SD] age, 37 +/- 9 years) with no history of gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, or cardiovascular disease were recruited. The MRI protocol included T2-weighted axial and gradient-echo MRE sequences using steady-state 60-Hz excitation. Two MRE acquisitions were performed, one with the driver placed on the right side of the abdomen and the other with the driver placed on the left side. Volunteers' body mass index (BMI), arterial mean blood pressure, age, spleen volume, and liver stiffness were also determined. Two radiologists independently measured the spleen stiffness on the MRE inversion images. The correlations between spleen stiffness and BMI, arterial mean blood pressure, age, spleen volume, and liver stiffness were quantified.
RESULTS: Sixteen volunteers underwent MRE. With the driver placed on the right side of the abdomen, the mean splenic stiffness was 3,565 +/- 586 Pa (range, 2,353-4,442 Pa); with the driver on the left side of the abdomen, the mean splenic stiffness was significantly (p < 0.004) different (4,255 +/- 625 Pa; range, 3,194-5,581 Pa). No significant correlation was found between spleen stiffness and BMI, arterial mean blood pressure, age, spleen volume, and liver stiffness (all p > 0.05)
CONCLUSION: These preliminary results in a small number of healthy volunteers show that spleen stiffness is not significantly correlated with BMI, arterial mean blood pressure, spleen volume, or liver stiffness. A significant difference was observed using different driver positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20651194     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

Review 1.  Noncontrast functional MRI of the kidneys.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mannelli; Jeffrey H Maki; Sherif F Osman; Hersh Chandarana; David J Lomas; William P Shuman; Ken F Linnau; Douglas E Green; Giacomo Laffi; Miriam Moshiri
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

3.  Liver stiffness measured by magnetic resonance elastography as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary case-control study.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Tsuyota Koshiishi; Katsuhiro Sano; Hiroyuki Morisaka; Shintaro Ichikawa; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Masanori Matsuda; Hideki Fujii; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Normal values of spleen stiffness in healthy children assessed by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI): comparison between two ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  Teresa Cañas; Teresa Fontanilla; María Miralles; Araceli Maciá; Ana Malalana; Enriqueta Román
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-03-22

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.795

Review 8.  Review of MR elastography applications and recent developments.

Authors:  Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  MR elastography for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: does histologic necroinflammation influence the measurement of hepatic stiffness?

Authors:  Yu Shi; Qiyong Guo; Fei Xia; Bogdan Dzyubak; Kevin J Glaser; Qiuju Li; Jiahui Li; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Acoustic waves in medical imaging and diagnostics.

Authors:  Armen P Sarvazyan; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.