Literature DB >> 20650608

Hypertrophy pattern and regional myocardial mechanics are related in septal and apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Hua Yang1, Shemy Carasso, Anna Woo, Michal Jamorski, Anna Nikonova, E Douglas Wigle, Harry Rakowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with considerable phenotypic heterogeneity. Previous studies have shown a relationship between the degree and location of hypertrophy and the prognosis of patients. The aim of this study was to compare left ventricular (LV) circumferential and longitudinal regional mechanics in patients with septal HCM and apical HCM to study the relationship between hypertrophy and function as assessed by myocardial mechanics.
METHODS: Seventy-two patients with HCM (27 with apical HCM, 45 with septal HCM) were compared with 25 clinically normal and age-matched subjects. Myocardial mechanics were assessed using Velocity Vector Imaging, which extracts myocardial motion estimates from B-mode clips by tracking user-defined points and feature tracking. The Velocity Vector Imaging software generated data on global and regional systolic and diastolic longitudinal and circumferential strain, strain rate, and rotational angle velocities. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc multiple comparisons was used among the three groups.
RESULTS: Normal subjects had relatively uniform strain and strain rates for all LV segments. Compared with the normal group, patients with septal HCM had decreased LV regional longitudinal strain rates and strain at both the basal and mid septal and lateral segments (all P < .01). Compared with patients with apical HCM, those with septal HCM had higher LV circumferential strain rates and strain at the basal and mid segments (P < .05 to P < .01). There were significant differences in rotational velocities at the mid segments among the three groups (P < .05 to P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCM have abnormalities in myocardial mechanics that are related to the site of abnormal myocardial hypertrophy.
Copyright © 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20650608     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  15 in total

1.  Systolic and diastolic myocardial mechanics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and their link to the extent of hypertrophy, replacement fibrosis and interstitial fibrosis.

Authors:  Gaetano Nucifora; Daniele Muser; Pasquale Gianfagna; Giorgio Morocutti; Alessandro Proclemer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  The prognostic value of standardized reference values for speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Gregory R Hartlage; Jonathan H Kim; Patrick T Strickland; Alan C Cheng; Nima Ghasemzadeh; Maria A Pernetz; Stephen D Clements; B Robinson Williams
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Dyssynchronization reduces dynamic obstruction without affecting systolic function in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Geneviève Giraldeau; Nicolas Duchateau; Bart Bijnens; Luigi Gabrielli; Diego Penela; Reinder Evertz; Lluis Mont; Josep Brugada; Antonio Berruezo; Marta Sitges
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Heterogeneity of longitudinal and circumferential contraction in relation to late gadolinium enhancement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Keita Sakamoto; Noriko Oyama-Manabe; Osamu Manabe; Tadao Aikawa; Yasuka Kikuchi; Harue Sasai-Masuko; Masanao Naya; Kohsuke Kudo; Fumi Kato; Nagara Tamaki; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 5.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an updated review on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  George Makavos; Chris Κairis; Maria-Eirini Tselegkidi; Theodoros Karamitsos; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Michel Noutsias; Ignatios Ikonomidis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  3-Dimensional regional and global strain abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Alessandro Satriano; Bobak Heydari; Namrata Guron; Kate Fenwick; Matthew Cheung; Yoko Mikami; Naeem Merchant; Carmen P Lydell; Andrew G Howarth; Nowell M Fine; James A White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  LV twisting and untwisting in HCM: ejection begets filling. Diastolic functional aspects of HCM.

Authors:  Ares Pasipoularides
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 8.  The role of echocardiography in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Lynne K Williams; Christiane H Gruner; Harry Rakowski
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Distinguishing ventricular septal bulge versus hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the elderly.

Authors:  Marco Canepa; Iraklis Pozios; Pier Filippo Vianello; Pietro Ameri; Claudio Brunelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Theodore P Abraham
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Sarcomere mutation-specific expression patterns in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Adam S Helms; Frank M Davis; David Coleman; Sarah N Bartolone; Amelia A Glazier; Francis Pagani; Jaime M Yob; Sakthivel Sadayappan; Ellen Pedersen; Robert Lyons; Margaret V Westfall; Richard Jones; Mark W Russell; Sharlene M Day
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2014-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.