BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical requirement for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of a rapid quantitative test for the measurement of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) in type 1 VWD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VWF:Ag was measured with an ELISA in a robotic instrument, as a reference method, and with a fully automated latex-immunoassay (LIA) on an ACL 9000 analyser in 1,716 subjects enrolled within the Molecular and Clinical Markers for Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand Disease (MCMDM-1VWD) Study. Among these subjects, 1,049 were healthy controls, 281 healthy family members and 386 affected members from 127 European families with type 1 VWD. RESULTS: The assay linearity range was 10-125 IU/dL for LIA (R2=0.99) and 5-133 IU/dL for ELISA (R2=0.99). The inter-assay CV for low VWF levels (approximately 30 IU/dL) was 2% for the LIA test and 8.7 % for ELISA. The sensitivity for detection of type 1 VWD affected members was 86% and the specificity 91% for LIA, 87% and 90% for ELISA. A receiver-operator (ROC) analysis disclosed only a marginal difference between the two tests, LIA having a slightly greater area under the curve (0.94 vs. 0.93, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: VWF:Ag LIA compared well to standard ELISA in this large population of patients and controls, showing better CV. However the lower detection limit for the VWF:Ag LIA compared to the VWF:Ag ELISA means that the LIA assay is less good at discriminating between type 3 VWD and moderate type 1 VWD. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical requirement for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of a rapid quantitative test for the measurement of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) in type 1 VWD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VWF:Ag was measured with an ELISA in a robotic instrument, as a reference method, and with a fully automated latex-immunoassay (LIA) on an ACL 9000 analyser in 1,716 subjects enrolled within the Molecular and Clinical Markers for Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand Disease (MCMDM-1VWD) Study. Among these subjects, 1,049 were healthy controls, 281 healthy family members and 386 affected members from 127 European families with type 1 VWD. RESULTS: The assay linearity range was 10-125 IU/dL for LIA (R2=0.99) and 5-133 IU/dL for ELISA (R2=0.99). The inter-assay CV for low VWF levels (approximately 30 IU/dL) was 2% for the LIA test and 8.7 % for ELISA. The sensitivity for detection of type 1 VWD affected members was 86% and the specificity 91% for LIA, 87% and 90% for ELISA. A receiver-operator (ROC) analysis disclosed only a marginal difference between the two tests, LIA having a slightly greater area under the curve (0.94 vs. 0.93, p=0.03). CONCLUSION:VWF:Ag LIA compared well to standard ELISA in this large population of patients and controls, showing better CV. However the lower detection limit for the VWF:Ag LIA compared to the VWF:Ag ELISA means that the LIA assay is less good at discriminating between type 3 VWD and moderate type 1 VWD. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jonathan C Roberts; Patti A Morateck; Pamela A Christopherson; Ke Yan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Joan Cox Gill; Robert R Montgomery Journal: Blood Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: E Berntorp; B Fuchs; M Makris; R Montgomery; V Flood; J S O'Donnell; A B Federici; D Lillicrap; P James; U Budde; M Morfini; P Petrini; S Austin; C Kannicht; V Jiménez-Yuste; C Lee Journal: Haemophilia Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.287