Literature DB >> 20649833

Influence on pressure transduction when using different drainage techniques and wound fillers (foam and gauze) for negative pressure wound therapy.

Malin Malmsjö1, Sandra Lindstedt, Richard Ingemansson.   

Abstract

Pressure transduction to the wound bed in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is crucial in stimulating the biological effects ultimately resulting in wound healing. In clinical practice, either foam or gauze is used as wound filler. Furthermore, two different drainage techniques are frequently employed. One involves the connection of a non-perforated drainage tube to the top of the dressing, while the other involves the insertion of perforated drains into the dressing. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of these two different wound fillers and drainage systems on pressure transduction to the wound bed in a challenging wound (the sternotomy wound). Six pigs underwent median sternotomy. The wound was sealed for NPWT using different wound fillers (foam or gauze) and drainage techniques (see earlier). Pressures between 0 and -175 mmHg were applied and the pressure in the wound was measured using saline-filled catheters sutured to the bottom of the wound (over the anterior surface of the heart) and to the side of the wound (on the thoracic wall). The negative pressure on the wound bed increased linearly with the negative pressure delivered by the vacuum source. In a dry wound, the pressure transduction was similar when using the different wound fillers (foam and gauze) and drainage techniques. In a wet wound, pressure transduction was better when using a perforated drainage tube inserted into the wound filler than a non-perforated drainage tube connected to the top of the dressing (-116 ± 1 versus -73 ± 4 mmHg in the wound at a delivered pressure of -125 mmHg for foam, P < 0·01), regardless of the type of wound filler. Gauze and foam are equally effective at delivering negative pressure to the wound bed. Perforated drainage tubes inserted into the wound filler are more efficient than a non-perforated drainage tubes connected to the top of the dressing. The choice of drainage technique may be particularly important in wounds with a large volume of exudate.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649833      PMCID: PMC7951691          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00706.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  12 in total

Review 1.  Topical negative pressure therapy in wound care.

Authors:  P E Banwell
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  Functional T lymphocytes infiltrate implanted polyvinyl alcohol foams during surgical wound closure therapy.

Authors:  C Gouttefangeas; M Eberle; P Ruck; M Stark; J E Müller; H D Becker; H G Rammensee; J Pinocy
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Topical negative pressure (TNP): the evolution of a novel wound therapy.

Authors:  P E Banwell; L Téot
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 4.  Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation.

Authors:  Michael J Morykwas; Jordan Simpson; Kally Punger; Anne Argenta; Lieveke Kremers; Joseph Argenta
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Hemodynamic effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in cardiac surgery: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rainer Petzina; Martin Ugander; Lotta Gustafsson; Henrik Engblom; Johan Sjögren; Roland Hetzer; Richard Ingemansson; Håkan Arheden; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Negative-pressure wound therapy using gauze or open-cell polyurethane foam: similar early effects on pressure transduction and tissue contraction in an experimental porcine wound model.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson; Robin Martin; Elizabeth Huddleston
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Pressure transduction to the thoracic cavity during topical negative pressure therapy of a sternotomy wound.

Authors:  Christian Torbrand; Richard Ingemansson; Lotta Gustafsson; Per Paulsson; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation.

Authors:  M J Morykwas; L C Argenta; E I Shelton-Brown; W McGuirt
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Interface dressings influence the delivery of topical negative-pressure therapy.

Authors:  Sophia M Jones; Paul E Banwell; Peter G Shakespeare
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Microdeformational wound therapy: effects on angiogenesis and matrix metalloproteinases in chronic wounds of 3 debilitated patients.

Authors:  Arin K Greene; Mark Puder; Roopali Roy; Danielle Arsenault; Stephanie Kwei; Marsha A Moses; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in challenging wounds.

Authors:  Umut Tuncel; Ünal Erkorkmaz; Aydın Turan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on healing of free full-thickness skin grafts in dogs.

Authors:  Bryden J Stanley; Kathryn A Pitt; Christian D Weder; Michele C Fritz; Joe G Hauptman; Barbara A Steficek
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 1.495

3.  Use of collagenase ointment in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy in the care of diabetic wounds: a case series of six patients.

Authors:  John D Miller; Elizabeth Carter; David C Hatch; Michelle Zhubrak; Nicholas A Giovinco; David G Armstrong
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2015-01-27

4.  Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection.

Authors:  Mehdi Ahmadinegad; Mohammad Reza Lashkarizadeh; Minoo Ghahreman; Mohammad Shabani; Mahsa Mokhtare; Maryam Ahmadipour
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2014
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.